Hello, Saboteurest, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
The blue bar below is a navigation template. Click "show" on the right to view an outline of Wikipedia's help pages. This template can be found at the bottom of most related pages.
Hi Saboteurest,
I reverted your changes to the first paragraph in the lead section of the Toronto article. I'm not against the changes, but some of the text you removed was reached by consensus on the Toronto Talk page. I have started a discussion on the Toronto Talk page regarding these changes, and have asked for input from other editors regarding the changes. Looking forward to discussing this with you and hearing your input.
Thanks, JPark99 (talk) 02:03, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DRN Notice
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Toronto#Changes to_the_First_Paragraph_of_the_Lead".The discussion is about the topic Toronto.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Nihlus17:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
You have been blocked for a variety of reasons.
Referring to other editors as trolls
Accusing other editors of being banned editors
Retalitory editing reverting other edits because you don't like them, or to get back at other editors, exact behaviour that got you blocked before
Referring to other editors edits as vandalism when they're trying to respect the referencing policy
Refusing to co-operate or go back on these issues when challenged, but instead doubling down on your behaviour
You are welcome to return to editing when your block expires. However be aware that if this behaviour continues then you may end up being blocked again. I advise you to read up on Wikipedia's policies and co-operate with other editors instead of battling against them. Canterbury Tailtalk18:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have been followed by an editor (Canterbury Tail) on multiple articles. After making an edit this editor mysteriously appears and adds unhelpful and conflicting edits to the same article which they have zero history of ever editing. This user admitted to following me on their own talk page after I warned them that I would report them if it continued. I provided numerous references for the infortmation in question. This editor then continued to troll me and claimed they were primary source references, which this does not fall under. Then this editor without notice, without following any procedures, and without involving a 3rd party, blocks me from editing. I believe this editor blocked me from editing so that I could not report him for WP:FOLLOWING me which I was in the process of doing. This is not only an unjust block but a complete conflict of interest. Saboteurest (talk) 19:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notes:
In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I have been [[WP:FOLLOWING|followed]] by an editor ([[User:Canterbury Tail|Canterbury Tail]]) on multiple articles. After making an edit this editor mysteriously appears and adds unhelpful and conflicting edits to the same article which they have zero history of ever editing. This user admitted to following me on their own talk page after I warned them that I would report them if it continued. I provided numerous references for the infortmation in question. This editor then continued to troll me and claimed they were primary source references, which this does not fall under. Then this editor without notice, without following any procedures, and without involving a 3rd party, blocks me from editing. I believe this editor blocked me from editing so that I could not report him for [[WP:FOLLOWING]] me which I was in the process of doing. This is not only an unjust block but a complete conflict of interest. [[User:Saboteurest|Saboteurest]] ([[User talk:Saboteurest#top|talk]]) 19:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= I have been [[WP:FOLLOWING|followed]] by an editor ([[User:Canterbury Tail|Canterbury Tail]]) on multiple articles. After making an edit this editor mysteriously appears and adds unhelpful and conflicting edits to the same article which they have zero history of ever editing. This user admitted to following me on their own talk page after I warned them that I would report them if it continued. I provided numerous references for the infortmation in question. This editor then continued to troll me and claimed they were primary source references, which this does not fall under. Then this editor without notice, without following any procedures, and without involving a 3rd party, blocks me from editing. I believe this editor blocked me from editing so that I could not report him for [[WP:FOLLOWING]] me which I was in the process of doing. This is not only an unjust block but a complete conflict of interest. [[User:Saboteurest|Saboteurest]] ([[User talk:Saboteurest#top|talk]]) 19:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= I have been [[WP:FOLLOWING|followed]] by an editor ([[User:Canterbury Tail|Canterbury Tail]]) on multiple articles. After making an edit this editor mysteriously appears and adds unhelpful and conflicting edits to the same article which they have zero history of ever editing. This user admitted to following me on their own talk page after I warned them that I would report them if it continued. I provided numerous references for the infortmation in question. This editor then continued to troll me and claimed they were primary source references, which this does not fall under. Then this editor without notice, without following any procedures, and without involving a 3rd party, blocks me from editing. I believe this editor blocked me from editing so that I could not report him for [[WP:FOLLOWING]] me which I was in the process of doing. This is not only an unjust block but a complete conflict of interest. [[User:Saboteurest|Saboteurest]] ([[User talk:Saboteurest#top|talk]]) 19:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
This message template was placed here by Nihlus, a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. You recently filed a request or were a major party in the DRN case titled "Talk:Toronto#Changes to_the_First_Paragraph_of_the_Lead". The case is now closed: consensus has been reached If you are unsatisfied with this outcome, you may refile the DRN request or open a thread on another noticeboard as appropriate. If you have any questions please feel free to contact this volunteer at his/ her talk page or at the DRN talk page. Thank you! --Nihlus 14:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
