This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cait.123(talk | contribs) at 15:40, 25 February 2018(updated wikiproject, article has cover photo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:40, 25 February 2018 by Cait.123(talk | contribs)(updated wikiproject, article has cover photo)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
The article doesn't seem to distinguish between what's in the book (the authors' opinions) and empirical reality. For instance, the idea that centralized power generation requires "costly transmission and distribution systems" (which implies that "soft" alternatives do not) is a claim about reality. On any other Wikipedia page, such a claim could be challenged and removed if found to be unsupported, or balanced by alternative evidence if it were genuinely controversial. However, on a book-description page, one can simply say "Lovins' claim is in the book, and the refutation is not". It seems like a way of ignoring the non-POV rules.
