User talk:Ripapart

Marriedwiki.com as a source

Hi Ripapart . I noticed that you used marriedwiki.com as a source for information in a biography article, Sarayu Rao . I cannot find any evidence or discussion that demonstrates marriedwiki.com meets reliable sourcing criteria, let alone the high standards required for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Your recent editing history at Veerapandiya Kattabomman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have Edit warred more than I did.

[[1]]
[[2]]
[[3]]
[[4]]

Ripapart (talk) 12:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You've been warned multiple times and you've been continuing the same disruptive behavior across anything you edit. You will be blocked if this continues. —SpacemanSpiff 12:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why? I just cannot understand, I have provided solid Source and as per the source I have provided content.

The other user has indulged in edit warring not me I have stopped from further editing the article as per edit warring rule, why are you ignoring the sourced content that was delted? Ripapart (talk) 12:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my message on your talk page blanked? And why do not you look into the current scenario? Why are you warning me when I have not broken any edit warring rules also reported the other user, you have warned me instead? The other user has removed sourced content I also posted the same on the talk page, the other user has not responded on talk page and has blatantly delted sourced content! Ripapart (talk) 12:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]