User talk:Americanknowledge96

Welcome!

Hello, Americanknowledge96, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Thomas.W ^talk 13:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm Thomas.W. I noticed that you made a change to an article, AR-15, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You can not add material without also providing sources for it, sources that should be provided as inline references at the same time as the material is added. Thomas.W ^talk 13:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at AR-15 style rifle, you may be blocked from editing. You removed an obviously true and verified statement, changed the title of a NYT article, added a false zero, and inserted some weirdly positive commentary. Drmies (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:32, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

the information removed was from a “bias on the subject” to keep the subject neutral the information on mass shooting is incorrectly placed at the beginning of the article, this information isn’t done on any of the other gun articles why is the AR article different. Also the number of AR’s in circulation can’t truly be calculated because of 80% lowers and also people building more uppers than lowers. most estimates put the ar in higher production numbers than what most news outlets state. Americanknowledge96 (talk) 01:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]