User talk:VendixDM
Speedy deletion nomination of 2018 Riyadh missile strike
Hello VendixDM,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2018 Riyadh missile strike for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:37, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 2018 Riyadh missile strike
Hello VendixDM,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2018 Riyadh missile strike for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:43, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 2018 Riyadh missile strike
Hello VendixDM,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2018 Riyadh missile strike for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 01:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
And stop calling editors who disagree with you vandals [1]. That's not vandalism. Acroterion (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
It was vandalism because it is a well established fact that Miles Copeland played a leading role in the coup:
Miles Copeland, who was dispatched to Iran by Roosevelt to make a logistical survey in preparation for the coup, sheds further light. Having arrived in Tehran, Copeland discovered that CIA operatives had already charted the routes that the demonstrating hordes would have to take, and pinpointed the targets that anyone organising a coup would (...) (page 116, Covert Action in the Cold War: US Policy, Intelligence and CIA Operations)