Jump to content

User talk:TripleRoryFan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 79.71.9.109 (talk) at 20:12, 15 April 2018 (Australian ODI players: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, TripleRoryFan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Flickerd (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When and when not to use the "Citation needed" tag

Hey there – with all due respect, I know you're trying your best to improve a bunch of articles, but there are times when the {{Citation needed}} tag is needed, and others where it isn't. On the occasions where I've pulled you up on it, such as summarising statistics and All-Australian selections, they aren't required, so please refrain from adding the tag when it isn't necessary. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 09:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've been looking to see if there's anything on Wikipedia to indicate that anything like an All-Australian selection or a statistic wouldn't need a citation, and the only thing I could find is here, where it actually says that one of the few things that citations are specifically needed for is for statistics. TripleRoryFan (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Just thought I'd offer another opinion seeing as you're new to Wikipedia. I'm not really sure where that was pulled from but statistics 100% have to be cited (even to AFL Tables is fine). If it's an article about a BLP, then essentially everything will need an inline citation. The amount of vandalism I see where someone is listed as an AA during the season or a day or two before the ceremony further shows the need for a citation for verification. A piece of advice though is if there are multiple {{citation needed}} tags, then perhaps do a {{BLP sources}} or {{moresources}} tag instead (if not doing so already). But keep up the good work elsewhere. Thanks, Flickerd (talk) 11:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a useful tip

Hi mate, thanks for all the great work you're doing with player articles!!! Try, however, not to change and replace the bowling and batting data in the info boxes, and if you do, make sure you don't get rid of the role or unlink the bowling syle. Thanks Aussiespinnersfanpage (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TripleRoryFan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Neser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australia A (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent corrections

Just wanted to know why should articles related to Australian Big Bash League need double pipes to link with these articles. Why are they stylized like this? E.g. [[Australian Big Bash league season|BBL|17]] instead of [[Australian Big Bash league season|2017-18 season]]. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pkbwcgs (talk · contribs) I've been doing it like that because it's concise and a lot of media refers to the seasons by BBL|04, especially the sources that I'm getting information from on cricket.com.au and from the advertiser. I'll try to avoid double piping by using {{!}} instead of |. TripleRoryFan (talk) 01:21, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Siddle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Anderson and Mitchell Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2018 Adelaide Football Club season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to W-League
Abbey Holmes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Darwin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

  • United States Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
  • Germany FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
  • India Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
  • United States Ceranthor, India Numerounovedant, Minnesota Carbrera, Netherlands Farang Rak Tham and Romania Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Australian ODI players

At some point between 25 Feb and today, you made an edit to the page List of Australia ODI cricketers. Unfortunately, before your edit a vandalistic edit was made so that some bogan could pretend he'd made 15,000 runs for Australia when he does not exist. I have reverted everything up to then so, if you wish to make your edit again, please do so. 79.71.9.109 (talk) 20:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]