User talk:Darlig Gitarist

Your GA nomination of William M. Branham

The article William M. Branham you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William M. Branham for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 01:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard error tool

Here is a link to install the tool that I was using. I installed it during an FA review back in the summer of 2016. Display name 99 (talk) 02:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great job on the Branham article! bonadea contributions talk 05:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment

William_M._Branham, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Doctor^G (talk) 13:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Darlig Gitarist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

William Branham page

@Darlig Gitarist: Are you an editor on any anti- William Branham websites? The reason I am asking is because I believe you are in violation of Wiki policies. As I have done on my posts to the talk page, please divulge YOUR connection to any related website(s), keep all your edits to the talk page, and do not edit any other Wikipedia page if your edit references William Branham. DEvans (talk) 20:38, 12 April 2018 (UTC) *I work for William Branham Ministries[reply]

@DEvans:, I find your question and inferred allegation quite offensive. I am not sure what evidence led you to your conclusions. I choose to be anonymous on Wikipedia as many editors do BUT I can state with certainty that I am not in violation of any Wikipedia policy.

Honestly, your message to me is in violation of general Wikipedia civility (see WP:CRY). You are looking for ghosts and the fact that my personal views are not in agreement with yours does not mean that I am somehow the editor of an anti-William Branham website. You might also read Wikipedia's policy on harassment (WP:HA). Darlig 🎸 ^{Talk to me} 20:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Darlig Gitarist: This is the second time you have spoken for me about how I believe. How do you know that my personal views are not in agreement with yours? Asking someone on their talk page for more information because I believe they are associated with a website that puts them in violation of Wikipedia's advocacy and/or COI policy is the proper way to deal with a situation such as this. User talk pages not only give us more information about the user, but it is also a place to bring your attention to something you may not know that you are violating (see WP:Neutral point of view). I hope that we can resolve this issue here. I am not asking you to reveal your name or personal information, but according to WP:Advocacy and/or WP:Conflict of interest, it is important to answer my question.

Are you or are you not an editor for a website that is dedicated to advocating either for or against William Branham? A simple yes or no answer will do. DEvans (talk) 15:12, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not important that I answer your questions. You state on Wikipedia that you are an employee of Voice of God Recordings (William Branham Ministries) as the Public Relations Manager. Given that you work for an NRM, I know that we will have significant conflicting views on a number of issues.

What is important is I can state unequivocally that I am not in violation of either WP:Advocacy or WP:Conflict of interest. I have been an editor on Wikipedia for 12 years and I do not take lightly the questioning of my integrity. I hope you can appreciate as to how that impacts my view of you. Darlig 🎸 ^{Talk to me} 17:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]