Talk:Privacy in education

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Classybluepower (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Bebelong, Its Gabe. This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Classybluepower (article contribs). This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GibsOfficial (article contribs). Peer reviewers: GloriaGu2018.

Potential Bibliography

I'm planning to work on a new Wikipedia page called Privacy in Education. I want to include as many citations as possible, and I want to cover more topics about privacy and education in general. I've compiled a bibliography of 20 peer-reviewed articles to use to start constructing the page. What do you think?

Baker, T. R. 2008. “Navigating State and Federal Student Privacy Laws to Design Educationally Sound Parental Notice Policies.” New Directions For Student Services 122: 81-104.

Barnard-Wills, David and Debi Ashenden. 2015. "Playing with Privacy: Games for Education and Communication in the Politics of Online Privacy." Political Studies63(1):142-160

Beaudin, Katie. 2017. "The Legal Implications of Storing Student Data: Preparing for and Responding to Data Breaches." New Directions for Institutional Research(172):37-48

Birnhack, M., Toch, E., and Hadar, I. 2014. “PRIVACY MINDSET, TECHNOLOGICAL MINDSET”. Jurimetrics, 55(1), 55-114.

Conway, Mike and Jacob Groshek. 2009. "Forgive Me Now, Fire Me Later: Mass Communication Students' Ethics Gap Concerning School and Journalism."Communication Education 58(4):461-482

Davis, A. A. 2001. “Do Children Have Privacy Rights in the Classroom?” Studies In Philosophy & Education 20(3): 245-254.

Dinger, D. R. 2001. “Johnny saw my test score, so I'm suing my teacher: Falvo v. Owasso Independent School District, peer grading, and a student's right to privacy under the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act.” Journal Of Law & Education 30(4): 575-626.

Elliott, T. L., Fatemi, D., & Wasan, S. 2014. “Student Privacy Rights--History, Owasso, and FERPA.” Journal Of Higher Education Theory & Practice 14(4): 34-47.

Erlandson, Karen. 2014. “Sexiled: Privacy Acquisition Strategies of College Roommates." Journal of College and University Student Housing 40(2):12-29

Graham, R. r., Hall, R., & Gilmer, W. G. 2008. “Connecting the dots...: information sharing by post-secondary educational institutions under the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).” Education & The Law 20(4): 301-316.

Hunt, Stacie. 2016. “Data Collection on School-aged Children through Common Core" A Journal of Law & Policy for the Information Society 12(305): 1-23.

James, B. 2015. “T.L.O. and Cell Phones: Student Privacy and Smart Devices After Riley v. California.” Iowa Law Review 101(1): 343-370.

Lemons, B. R. 2012. “Public Education and Student Privacy: Application of the Fourth Amendment to Dormitories at Public Colleges and Universities.” Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal (1): 31-77.

Lowenstein, H. 2016. “The Great Wall of FERPA: Surmounting a Law's Barrier to Assurance of Learning.” Journal Of Legal Studies Education 33(1): 129-164.

Marek, Michael W. and Stan Skrabut. 2017. "Privacy in Educational use of Social Media in the U.S." International Journal on E-Learning 16(3):265-286

Pence, H. E. 2015. “Will Big Data Mean the End of Privacy?” Journal Of Educational Technology Systems 44(2): 253-267.

Peterson, D. 2016. “EdTech and Student Privacy: California Law as a Model.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 31: 961-995.

Polonetsky, J., & Tene, O. 2015. “Who is Reading Whom Now: Privacy in Education from Books to MOOCs.” Vanderbilt Journal Of Entertainment & Technology Law 17(4): 927-990.

Stahl, W. s., & Karger, J. 2016. “Student Data Privacy, Digital Learning, and Special Education: Challenges at the Intersection of Policy and Practice.” Journal Of Special Education Leadership 29(2): 79-88.

Stuart, Susan P. 2005. “A Local Distinction: State Education Privacy Laws for Public School Children.” West Virginia Law Review 108(361): 1-40.

Stuart, Susan P. 2004. “Fun with Dick and Jane and Lawrence: A Primer on Education Privacy as Constitutional Liberty.” Marquette Law Review 88(563): 1-87.

Tudor, J. 2015. “Legal Implications of Using Digital Technology in Public Schools: Effects on Privacy.” Journal Of Law & Education 44(3): 287-343.

Uçuş, Ş. s., & Dedeoğlu, H. 2016. “Preparation and Evaluation of Children's Rights Education Curriculum: An Action Research Regarding on Protection Rights Module.” International Journal Of Progressive Education 12(3): 91-109.

Weeks, K. M. 2001. “Family-friendly FERPA policies: affirming parental partnerships.” New Directions For Student Services 94: 39-50.

Wisniewski, Pamela J., Bart P. Knijnenburg and Heather R. Lipford. 2017. "Making Privacy Personal: Profiling Social Network Users to Inform Privacy Education and Nudging." International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98:95-108

Yang, Fang, & Wang, Shudong. 2014. “Students’ Perception Toward Personal Information and Privacy Disclosure in E-Learning.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 13(1): 207-216.

Young, Elise. 2015. “Educational Privacy in the Online Classroom: FERPA, MOOCS, and the Big Data Conundrum.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 28(549): 1-53.Classybluepower (talk) 04:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hello, this is Bebelong. Below are my comments for the peer review!

The general structure is awesome! I understand what each section is talking about and the language used is very clear.
I think you might be able to change your lead section a bit as you spend quite a good amount of time in talking about student expectation of privacy without mentioning in the lead section.
I know during previous lab Naniette suggested that there shouldn't be a leap between the lead section and the student expectation of privacy; however, I think that if you open an individual section for the expectation of privacy, it might be not so much related to your topic, privacy in education. It might be better to combine expectation of privacy and student expectation of privacy into one section.
For the student expectation of privacy section, I think you gave too much weight on a particular example. It might be better to add more examples if you can find more.
There are some overlaps between the student expectation of privacy section and the legal cases in the student educational records section, which you might consider making some changes.
Overall, it is a very good article with a lot of information in it. I'd say I learn a lot through reading your article. Great Job! I really look forward to reading the whole completed article after you finish expanding different sections! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bebelong (talk • contribs) 03:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! This Its_Gabe. Here are my comments for the peer review assignment. * You lead section is great. It does a great job informing your audience about the important aspect of the topics as well as give the audience a good grasp of the article is all about. Maybe you can add why such a topic is important.

Your article’s structure is very clear and well-organized
In terms of balance (I know you are still working on the article) in the legal case section, you hint that there are a lot of legal cases pertaining to this case? Maybe include more and talk about the importance of the decision in relation to privacy in Education. Maybe include something about the recent supreme court ruling about cellphone search in school
Your writing is very easy to understand and is loaded with information! I can’t wait to see that finished product. Awesome job!!!!

Its Gabe (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to Bibliography

I am currently planning to expand on the higher education section of this article. I have compiled a bibliography of peer-reviewed articles that may be useful for that specific section. Any comments or suggestions of other articles I should look into primarily for the higher education section? Thanks!

Also, some may be repeated from the first post on the Talk Page because I forgot to add a new page and instead included them in the first bibliography articles. Anyways, here is the full list:

edit* 13 so far, more coming soon. GibsOfficial (talk) 16:29, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Gabby[reply]

Beaudin, Katie. 2017. "The Legal Implications of Storing Student Data: Preparing for and Responding to Data Breaches." New Directions for Institutional Research (172):37-48

Caruso, Lawrence R. 1971. “Privacy of Students and Confidentiality of Student Records” Case Western Law Review 22(3):379-389

Davenport, Robin G. 2017. “The Integration of Health and Counseling Services on College Campuses: Is There a Risk in Maintaining Student Patients’ Privacy?” Journal of College Student Psychotherapy 31(4):268-280

Dennen, Vanessa and Kerry Burner J. 2017. “Identity, context collapse, and Facebook use in higher education putting presence and privacy at odds.” Distance Education 38(2):173-192

Grayson, Lawrence P. 1978. “Education, Technology, and Individual Privacy.” Educational Communication and Technology 26(3):195-206

Ifenthaler, Dirk and Clara Schumacher. 2016. “Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics.” Educational Technology Research & Development 64(5):923-938

Khatcheressian, Laura. 2003.“FERPA and the Immigration and Naturalization Service: A Guide for University Counsel on Federal Rules for Collecting, Maintaining and Releasing Information About Foreign Students” Journal of College and University Law 29(2):457-484

Slade, Sharon and Paul Prinsloo. 2013. "Learning Analytics: Ethical Issues and Dilemmas." The American Behavioral Scientist 57(10):1510-1529

Stablein, Timothy, Joseph Lorenzo Hall, Chauna Pervis and Denise L. Anthony. 2015. “Negotiating stigma in health care: disclosure and the role of electronic health records.” Health Sociology Review 24(3):227-241

Voeller, Stacy. 2007. “Privacy Policy Assessment for the Livingston Lord Library At Minnesota State University Moorhead.” Library Philosophy and Practice 1-29

White, Britton. 2007. “Students Rights: From In Loco Parentis to Sine Parentibus and Back Again? Understanding the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act in Higher Education.” Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal (2):321-350

Woodward, Beverly, and Dale Hammerschmidt. 2003. “Requiring Consent Vs. Waiving Consent for Medical Records Research: A Minnesota Law Vs. the U.S. (HIPAA) Privacy Rule” Health Care Analysis 11(3):207-218

Zimmer, Michael. 2014. “Librarians’ Attitudes Regarding Information and Internet Privacy.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 84(2):123-151

Peer Review by Jaysdayy

Gabby, overall great job with your article! It was clear and easy to read. I like how you organized the content! Your lead did a good job at overviewing what the article would be about. Also, it seems you have a set list of reliable sources! Your tone definitely sounded encyclopedic to me.I have pointed out a few things above. Some suggestions were made about word choices that would make some sentences a little more clear and a few grammatical/spelling errors.I learned many new things about privacy in education.I want to study higher education post-grad so I really enjoyed reading your article.I have new insight on something that I never thought about before! Let me know if you have any questions on the feedback that I have provided. Jaysdayy (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Review of visual Presentation In order to accurately determine you performance I watched the video twice. Once with sound, and then a second time without sound, to see if your choice of movement reflected what you said.

With Sound:

Firstly, you chose a really difficult topic, and I like that you included statistics within your presentation. I also liked how you started of the presentation by stating what you were going to talk about. Also thanks for the shout out, during your presentation! You do occasional you do say uhmm, but not too noticeably. Also I like that you smile during your presentation, I see that your coping mechanism when your nervous is laughing or cracking jokes, which personally put me in a good mood. Whenever you knew a topic you just went right through it (sometimes I feel like you forget to breath), so whenever you know the information or are passionate about it you do well for example.

Without sound:

Whenever you don’t know what to say you either look to a bottom corner, side to side, or make a face. You definitely used you hands, which was good, because they were nuanced and not distracting, I think it may have actually helped with the rhythm of the way you speak. It could be that we were seated lowly, so in order to meet our eyes you would look lower, but for some reason it looked like you looked at the ground often, but that could just be a trick of perspective.

General Summary of Article

I am glad you changes the structure it flows better is well organized now. There are still a few grammar errors here and there, some of which are not in the portions that you wrote. I can stylistically tell which parts you wrote versus the other author, because you two have slightly different styles but because you focus on a different aspect of education (higher education) it flows well. I am impressed with how long it is, very impressive. In terms of after reading it as a reader I feel very informed, there are some times were I get lost in the information, but that is more of a me thing. It was encyclopedic and unbiased and I definitely think you included all the required content, so you are definitely done. Congrats on uploading to the main space!

Below is the transcript of the comments I made on this Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LVWcAuog2nbBVAcPPLGB15evfPKEplhyCMJn_2nPgdI/edit?usp=sharing

Selected text: FERPA but also respect the expectation of confidentiality between patient and counselor/therapist. [39] this is more of a me question, how did the court rule.

Selected text: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Credit Reporting Act insert as indented bullet list

Selected text: Nevertheless, the distribution of this information is not limited by FERPA among school officials as long as the disclosure is done due to "legitimate educational interests." what does this mean?

Selected text: accessible more accessible?

Selected text: that use this method of continuity care fluff, remove

Selected text: becoming more commonly

Selected text: of patients of its patients?

Selected text: different difference

Selected text: defined defines, (present tense?)

Selected text: 1) Does the communication originate in confidence? 2) Is the element of confidentiality essential to the full and satisfactory maintenance of the relationship between the parties? 3) Is the relationship one that must be fostered?? 4) Will there result an injury that is greater than any benefits which may be gained from that disclosure? indent this if possible Reply•Resolve

Selected text: as not disclosing remove this

Selected text: there they

Selected text: differentiate I think this is a verb, replace with differentiation maybe?

Selected text: For example if a student in a residence hall is diagnosed with a contagious disease (measles), has a serious eating disorder, has suicidal ideation, binge drinks heavily, or has erratic and angry behaviors. incomplete sentence, for examle if blah blah blah, then what happens?

Selected text: professions professionals

Selected text: who remove

Selected text: to that?

Selected text: to most effectively redundant, choose one

Selected text: own remove? - kind of wordy

Selected text: not repeated word

Selected text: The this

Selected text: such as remove

Selected text: students student's

Selected text: Yet the privacy issues arise in how student data need a better transition ot new paragraph

Selected text: are then able use this data to

Selected text: By blocking their information they believe that they avoid context collapse that may cause confusion of who the person really is. still don't understand what this sentence is saying, do they lie about their identity on facebook?

Selected text: using that use

Selected text: as formal settings as through formal settings (parallel structure)

Selected text: was remove Reply•Resolve

Selected text: and tha ,making it

Selected text: being breached given last edit: breach

Selected text: digitalized digitized

Selected text: of for?

Selected text: Stacie Hun potentially hyperlink (who is she?)

Selected text: illegal drug or alcohol use illegal use of drugs or alcohol while underage

Selected text: underage and remove

Selected text: about regarding (maybe?)

Selected text: vague and unclear redundant choose one

Selected text: Such topic remains as such topics remain

Selected text: for example the Owasso Independent School District v. Falvo that was handled by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002. this feels like a dependent clause that needs to be completed talking about how it relates to privacy concerns.

Selected text: impartial non-biased use of word with same meaning choose one

Selected text: in during

Selected text: are prevalent to are related to Class20 (talk) 20:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your super helpful presentation and peer review. I will definitely take what you said into account by practicing public speaking more so that I am ready for my presentation and I will go back to the article and fix those errors. Thanks again! 2601:644:502:D93:4958:A599:14E:71F7 (talk) 05:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Gibs — Preceding unsigned comment added by GibsOfficial (talk • contribs)