Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney – Justice for All

Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney – Justice for All has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 27, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Visual novels GA‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney: Justice for All/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 23:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this in the next few days. --ProtoDrake (talk) 23:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@IDV: I can't see anything here to stop it going through at once. This one merits an Instant Pass. Congratulations on creating an article that was a fascinating read. --ProtoDrake (talk) 12:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 May 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved all for consistency. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– Regardless of Capcom's previous indecision about the use/misuse of colons in this game series' titles, it appears that the current localization and marketing teams have settled on this naming scheme for the new Ace Attorney games (see Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Dual Destinies and Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Spirit of Justice) and have retroactively applied it to the older games in official press releases since at least 2014 [1] [2]. Prior discussions of this move have ended in no consensus because of said lack of cohesion in official sources but now there seems to be a unified "correct" answer which has the added benefit of matching the later games. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator and for consistency. Wani (talk) 15:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support since hyphens are now being used on a consistent basis I see no readon to use the second colon.--67.68.163.254 (talk) 21:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Capcom's way of styling the titles has been consistent since Dual Destinies in 2013, and has even been applied on previous releases. WP:NAMINGCRITERIA says to aim for consistency between similar articles' titling, so I see no reason not to go ahead with the move.--IDV^talk 01:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clearly the latter games have set a precedent. --MASEM (t) 14:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Shall we change the hyphen type from this (-) to that (–), as in Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney – Justice for All? George Ho (talk) 16:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would likely depend on what one of these the sources use.--67.68.163.254 (talk) 00:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*sigh* Looks like both hyphen and n-dash are used interchangeably within the same Capcom website (e.g. [3]). In the absence of a clear ruling, I'm leaning toward hyphen since it's easier to type (insert handwavey WP:ACCESS concerns or something here). Axem Titanium (talk) 22:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

No comment on the above RM, but I do believe the en dash should be used instead of the hyphen based on our manual of style despite whatever usage in sources (most of which don't know how to use an en dash anyway) czar 01:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]