Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aggro deck

Aggro deck

A broad genre of Magic: The Gathering decks. See the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Deck Formats and Strategies discussion which resulted in deletion. Wikipedia is not a game stratgy guide. Andrew Levine 04:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 05:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You might want to look at Magic: The Gathering deck types . Just saying. Mister.Manticore 05:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Good idea, those other ones should be nominated for deletion as wll. There doesn't need to be articles for each deck type. TJ Spyke 05:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Good catch, Manticore. I will add those soon. Andrew Levine 05:46, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MER-C 05:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This isn't a "game strategy guide." It's a discussion of one of the three main deck archtypes of the original TCG. If every single Pokemon (of which there are over 300) gets an article, why can't the deck types, of which there are only three and none of them are stubs, get articles? Silver2195 13:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Because as well-established as the game's deck-format trinity of aggro, combo, and control are, they are not defined by Magic's rules, but rather have evolved as a result of players over the years tuning their decks to find an optimal strategy. As for the Pokémon, their articles do not (or in any cases where they do, should not) cover game strategy, but they do cover the established story of the characters as they appear in the comics and cartoons. Plus, there's the Yu-Gi-Oh precedent to consider. Andrew Levine 15:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete — but in that case you need to do the same to all the decks, per Mister.Manticore-- lucasbfr ^talk 16:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]