Talk:Ramit Sethi

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 April 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Vandalism? The stuff is not referenced —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.251.17 (talk) 20:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another free publicity 'article'?

Surely Wikipedia can do a better job of policing articles that could be summarised as: Not many people have heard of me. I want lots of publicity for my book / film / product. Wikipedia can give me a big bundle of it, and it's all free.

Yawn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.219.91 (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have a valid point, but being a NYT #1 author is notable. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 21:00, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that this person is pretty famous already as an author and through his blog, as the sources given attest. I think we can erase the warning about sources. Tainanfish (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The NYT claim looks to be bogus, there is no citation. 198.208.47.87 (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Income from teaching vs Income from practicing what he teaches?

Is there any way we can get information about how much he makes from selling books and courses to people wanting to be rich versus how much he actually makes by putting into practice the stuff taught in his courses/book? Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 22:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Track Record of Success

As another poster fairly questioned, it would be interesting to have information around what he's actually done to in relation to what he teaches.

As far as I can tell, Ramit hasn't had a successful business outside of a business that tells other people how to create successful businesses. In other words, it appears that he jumped straight into teaching something that he never himself actually did. This seems to be the trend with famous, wealthy internet marketers, and it feels very fraudulent.

They all sell internet marketing success, but none seem to have internet marketing success outside of selling the concept of success to wannabe internet marketers.

This is a worthy question to be asked in this forum. At minimum, the article should show the progression of his businesses. If his very first business was a business telling others how to succeed with businesses (before he did so himself), then that is important information that allows for a lot of deduction as to his business, and him as a businessman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.88.69.91 (talk) 10:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From the first edit onward, this was an advertisment

First edit was in 2005 most likely by Ramit himself.

The page is written to advertise and the person is a marketer under the guise of personal finance.

I dont think this page should be deleted, but this page should be more objective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TangleUSB (talk • contribs) 20:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No source of New York times Best seller

Link to the claim was invalid and a follow up article with the New York Times did not mention this 'achievement'.

This entire article should be under review for the claims made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.208.47.87 (talk) 16:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]