Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Glee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Czar (talk | contribs) at 09:50, 21 June 2018 (Tap Tap Glee: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

AfDs for this article:
Tap Tap Glee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was previously deleted by User Callanecc (talk · contribs) for not being notable per a PROD nomination by User BU Rob13 (talk · contribs). Article was recreated by User Mayamaya7 (talk · contribs) immediately after Tap Tap Revenge 2 and Template:Tap Tap series were nominated for deletion per the same notability issues. Previous articles Tap Tap Revenge 3, Tap Tap Revenge 4, Nine Inch Nails Revenge, and Nirvana Revenge have all been deleted or redirected per lack of WP:Notability and WP:Reliable Sources. User Mayamaya7 (talk · contribs) restored all of these around the same time without consensus, and they are all now back to redirects thanks to User Polyamorph (talk · contribs).

I also propose deleting Tap Tap Revenge 2 and bundling it with this AfD. It currently has a separate AD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Revenge 2. -R9tgokunks 00:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
pinging @The1337gamer:, @Czar:, as users have participated in redirecting of related articles per failing of WP:GNG. R9tgokunks 01:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NukeThePukes:, @Czar:, @CAPTAIN RAJU:, @Lee Vilenski:. I also have a separate AfD for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Revenge 2, but i'm thinking it should be bundled with this as the issues with it are the same. I'm not clear as to how bundlign would be done in this case, though. Any thoughts on deletion/merger of that article? R9tgokunks 23:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bundling only makes sense at the outset when the articles in the article group will not be discussed individually. It makes more sense to ping those who participated above to see the other discussion as well than to merge that discussion here when the above participants may or may not agree that its case is identical to the one under discussion. But this is all besides the point as these articles under discussion should have, reasonably, been redirected as an alternative to deletion before coming to AfD. (not watching, please {{ping}} as needed) czar 09:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]