Jump to content

User talk:Dieter Lloyd Wexler/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dieter Lloyd Wexler (talk | contribs) at 23:59, 9 July 2018 (OneClickArchiver adding Tech News: 2018-25). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive 1Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 10

I will try to find more sources and fix the issue for Jyoti Arora

Thanks for the suggestion. Dial911 (talk) 09:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Unnamed section

Hello Please can you help improve it. Thanks. Kabusa16 (talk) 11:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Re: Ijele - The Traveler

I'm still working on the article to get it to standard. Thanks for the review

Aghachi7 (talk) 15:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

This (The X-Files) tagging as CSD A1

I've declined the speedy deletion tagged you placed on this article. It's clear from the article as it exists that this is an X Files episode. Also, I've confirmed through sources independent of Wikipedia that this episode is real. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award

Well done on reviewing over 1000 articles in the last month! Thank you very much. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Ernst Schering Foundation

Hey Babymissfortune, thank you for your comments regarding the Ernst Schering Foundation. I fully agree with the issue regarding missing references, I had put a note on this in the talk page of the article - the article is a translation from the German equivalent. I am afraid I lack the references, but the content sounded reliable and is not really controversial, so I think with the notice that the article currently lacks references to neutral sources, it might attract others to provide them.

Regarding the general notability, the foundation was endowed very generously be European standards and the science prize it awards is among the more prestigious in Germany; also, a list of awardees already existed on the English wikipedia, so I think it is justified to explain the underlying art and science foundation with its own article. I hope you will agree and that the article won't end up getting deleted. Thank you! Biophil23 (talk) 08:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

16:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Reverts

Hi. I saw your numerous reverts to my removal of redlinks. Per WP:AFD/AI#Carrying out the AfD close, if it is found that an article subject is not notable, redlinks are removed in most cases. Your summary of "link needed" or "still playing" is not an explanation for reverting since the content is not being deleted, only the link. Killiondude (talk) 17:16, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

@Killiondude: Yes I know that. But in most of the articles where you removed the link, redlinks are still needed/in practice. If you would scan the basketball teams, all players have wikilinks whether they have an article or not. The links are most important in the templates, to be able to distinguish which player is which. When you removed the link, all that remain is the surname. And people who will be able to see the template might say "who is this Caperal guy?" So yes, sometimes redlinks are still needed. If you really want to remove the link, you maybe should just remove the players' names as well, not just the link, so as to be consistent with the rest of the article. Babymissfortune 17:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Bridge the Divide

Thanks for letting me know! I'll see what I can do to improve the page! Uhtregorn (talk) 21:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

help me

how are you able to wikipedia so interactly. You are one of the great wikipedian. I salute you. I also read in school. I read in Budhanilkantha School. But anyways, you are great. You can progress very much in your life. 10:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC) OTserInW (talk) 10:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Voice FM 103.9

Hello Babymissfortune. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Voice FM 103.9, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 14:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Contested

Hi, I have contested the deletion of both my pages as I feel they both have a right to be on Wikipedia. The reason you have given of "not important enough to be on an encyclopedia" is invalid as he is a Radio Presenter. If you delete the page using this reason, you may as well delete all presenters.

I ask you kindly to remove deletion tags off both Joshua Dodd and Voice FM as they are clearly within the rules. Bigbrojd (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

@Bigbrojd: I am not the one who deletes pages. I am just someone files them for deletion. Just wait for an admin to respond. Thanks. Babymissfortune 15:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Minor barnstar
For helping out with deletion sorting. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Redirectes Elia Maria Norelle Ilano

Can you provide the reason why you redirected that name to Ang Probinyasno? Mikelopez12 (talk) 11:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@Mikelopez12: I provided it already. Babymissfortune 11:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Barangay Ginebra San Miguel Depth Chart

Hi Babymissfortune. Greg Slaughter is the current starting center of Brgy. Ginebra. Jericho De Guzman is on the reserve list. Also, Mark Caguioa is the 2nd SG of their team behind Scottie Thompson.

@Gayviewmahat: But you should always provide your source. That's what matters always. Babymissfortune 12:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Sudeshna Swayamprabha

Hello Babymissfortune. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Sudeshna Swayamprabha, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. Sam Sailor 09:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

With a bylined article in The Daily Star featuring subject, we are well passed a lack of CCS. Please be careful. Sam Sailor 09:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reviewing the page I created. The article has been nominated for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Dixon (hydroponics) due to lack of notability. I can see that you have some experience on this and wonder if you might want to contribute your opinion on the matter (with some urgency). Many thanks for your time. Zosimos102 (talk) 11:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

18:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

Redirect Ninja

Redirect Ninja
I've seen you reviewing quite a few redirects during the NPP New Year Backlog Drive. Thanks! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
@Insertcleverphrasehere: Thanks for this! I'll try to do well every time. Babymissfortune 00:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Stub sorting

Hello Babymissfortune,

I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{stub}} template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks!-- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Need help

Hi, you reviewed my article, thank you very much. Please see someone wants to delete in :( please tell them he is notable because you reviewed it after seeing something positive. Looking forward Romeo2259 (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Romeo2259 (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

@Romeo2259: "... he is notable because you reviewed it after seeing something positive. ..." — that is not true. Not because I reviewed it, I have sen something positive on the page. If you really think he is notable, post a message on the AfD of the page. Babymissfortune 09:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

I did that already, I would really appreciate if you say the same there and at least tell them it should be kept. I can update the article time to time to add more stuff.Romeo2259 (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

23:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Mass page review request/fyi

Hi, you recently reviewed some redirects (a handful) I made. Since then, I've made a few hundred more due to this effort. Just letting you know in case you wanted to do more!   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  01:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

@Tom.Reding: I am currently working on these. Thanks for notifying me. :-) Babymissfortune 06:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for checking my redirect on Garibaldi mettwurst! I had some difficulties linking to the section within the other Australian page, so I'm glad it seems okay. Thank you so much!

SunnyBoi (talk) 23:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

17:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

NPP backlog drive

Any chance you could give me a rough estimate for what the ratio of redirects to articles was for your reviews during the recent NPP backlog drive? I am trying to work out who did the most 'article' reviews (which will be a separate award to the top reviewers cup and the runner up cup). If you could let me know, that would be great. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 07:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

@Insertcleverphrasehere: Sorry for the very late reply. I was busy at school and I had no time to review my patrol log to at least give an estimate. But as you have stated already at Talk:NPR, the bar set is about 1800 articles and I am very sure that I did not review that number of articles (I'm confident I reached at least a thousand though). Babymissfortune 14:22, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

20:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Dieter Lloyd Wexler, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
  • We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

  • We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
  • Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

Runner Up New Page Reviewer
For completing 2329 reviews during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive (the second highest number) please accept this Special Edition Barnstar as well as the Runner Up Cup. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessarily Complicated Gears
For maintaining a streak of over 500 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded with the unnecessarily complicated gears. You truly are tireless! Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

21:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

22:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

19:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Need help with talking to user

I’ve tried to use User Talk:2A02:C7D:B925:5A00:8C:E3C5:7394:36C0 but can’t get through. This user keeps changing edits without reasons in edit summary of Hanggang Saan. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Hanggang_Saan The changes user made are not verified. Basically user is adding last names to characters when it is not true as far as the series is going. User is assuming they will marry their love team. I’ve reverted user’s edits the first time and tried to reach user unsuccessfully. The user changed the edits again a second time, again with no verified source and no edit summary. How can I warn or talk to the user?Pipamidalton (talk) 21:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC) Pipamidalton (talk) 21:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

@Pipamidalton: What do you mean as "you cannot reach the user"? I have found the link to his talk page and I have warned him regarding this. Babymissfortune 00:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
@Babymissfortune: thank you for doing that. When I try to reach out to an IP editor or any editor, I type User Talk:and the number and that normally gets me to the talk page. But I wasn’t able to do that successfully with 2A02:C7D:B925:5A00:8C:E3C5:7394:36C0. Instead it comes out with no results. Perhaps I’m doing it wrong? But your help is much appreciatedPipamidalton (talk) 06:26, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Pipamidalton You should have not capitalized the letter T in "Talk". It should be "User talk", not "User Talk", Babymissfortune 07:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
@Babymissfortune: i think the same user 90.206.117.29 but under a different IP address is at it again. See recent edits here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/90.206.117.29 same type of edits, adding non existent last names to major characters in the series without verified sources. I checked myself and the edits are wrong. Sounds like a fan rooting for love teams. I tried to warn them but again can’t find user talk:90.206.117.29, no matter if I don’t capitalize the “t” in talk. Your help again would be appreciated. If it continues, I’ll request for page protection. ThanksPipamidalton (talk) 03:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Pipamidalton Left a warning on the talk page. Babymissfortune 03:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Mass page review request/fyi (2)

I've made ~200 Taiwanese MRT/LRT 'Station' -> 'station' #Rs yesterday for consistency, to compliment the other 200 'Station' #Rs that already exist. FYI in case you're free to review them! Thanks again!   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  14:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

17:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

19:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Review page Adamu Garba II

I created the page Adamu Garba II, come and review it when you're chanced Aghachi7 (talk) 06:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Re: Anonymous User 130.105.10.46

Good day Babymisfortune! I've been meaning to reach the administrators of Wikipedia for help regarding anonymous user 130.105.10.46. I saw that you reverted the user's edits and have left message for him to clarify his actions.

I would like to seek help regarding said user because, other than the fact that he removes content without an edit summary, the user seems to be targetting edits I've made. I've created a discussion on the affected pages, Ang Probinsyano and List of Ang Probinsyano guest stars but the user has not responded. It used to be that every time I add a content and reference, 130.105.10.46 would make it a point to remove it, all before 24 hours have passed since my edit, which then would have constituted edit warring. The user's pattern of editing is that whenever a new character appears on the show, either as a regular or guest, the user would add that entry then remove all other entries that I placed, especially references. I'd like to show proof here, sadly, I'm still learning my way around Wikipedia. In lieu of that, I'm respectfully directing attention to the edit history of the affected pages as pieces of evidence for the editing behavior of anonymous user 130.105.10.46.

Thank you! Gardo Versace (talk) 17:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Re: anonymous user

Good day Babymisfortune! I'm again asking for your help regarding the anonymous user subject of the discussion I posted on your user page. It appears that after having been warned of the removal of the references on the page Ang Probinsyano and List of Ang Probinsyano episodes without providing an edit summary, the said user did the same again using the IP address 130.105.10.206. As I have mentioned in the previous discussion, I have created started a discussion on the Ang Probinsyano page for the anonymous user to explain the removal of references. There has not been a reply and the anonymous user just keeps on removing references that have been added to peove the veracity of the entries. It is in my opinion that it is the same user doing the inexplicable removal of references as shown by the fact that not only are the IP addresses 130.105.10.206, 130.105.10.46, 130.105.10.170 very similar, they also show a unity of action in that the anonymous user constantly removes all references listed in the page.

The situation is all the more pressing in the case of the guest stars page as it was previously listed as a listcruft. I toiled long and hard to find references that would verify the correctness listed on the page, until the page was removed from the status of listcruft. Yet, despite this, said anonymous user constantly removes all references listed on the page. I humbly seek your help in addressing the situation with said anonymous user as the edits the user does is not only disruptive but counterproductive. Gardo Versace (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Dr. Sellappan Nirmala listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dr. Sellappan Nirmala. Since you had some involvement with the Dr. Sellappan Nirmala redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

20:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Kalavani 2

Babymiss, I denied your speedy for Kalavani 2. The context is quite clear, as it explicitly states that it's about an upcoming movie. A1 should only be used if you don't know how to search for more information, such as "He is awesome and his car is blue." In this case, I had no problem at all confirming that this is a real upcoming movie, seeing a handful of promotions and gossip about it.

Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Dieter Lloyd Wexler, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

  • ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

  • Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

  • While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

  • The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Re: Anonymous User 130.105.10.172

Good day Babymissfortune!

I am posting on your talk page again to seek help for the protection of the entries in the Ang Probinsyano and List of Ang Probinsyano guest stars pages. As I have intimated in the previous discussions I left on your talk page, anonymous user 130.105.10.172 has a habit of removing all wikilinks and citations to both pages without any reason. And even if said anonymous user does decide to out a reason as to why he removes the wikilinks and the citations, it would still be disruptive and counterproductive to said pages as one of the Five Pillars of Wikipedia is that its articles are written from a neutral point of view, which calls for every article to be verifiable. By removing the anonymous user's removal of the citations, the verifiability of the entries on the page is negated. Also, again, as I have intimated in the previous discussions, the same anonymous user has the same modus operandi and switches between these IP addresses: 130.105.10.206, 130.105.10.46, 130.105.10.170.

Very recently, the anonymous user has become even bolder in his modus operandi. A mere 17 minutes after you reverted the edits that the anonymous user made, he again restored his edits; good thing L3X1 again reverted his edits and has likewise left a message on the anonymous user's talk page.

I humbly implore you Babymisfortune to conduct an investigation on the anonymous user, and if you find in your discretion that ot be proper, to sanction the said anonymous user by banning his IP Address from editing. Harsh it may seem, but it has become a recurring problem for the pages. These IP Addresses 130.105.10.206, 130.105.10.46, 130.105.10.170, 130.105.10.172 being identical and there being a unity of action between them, the removal of wikilinks and citations, lead to no other conclusion than that it is the same user performing the same counterproductive and disruptive edits over and over again in the said pages.

I am hoping that redress may be afforded for the anonymous user's repeated offense on said pages.

Thank you! Gardo Versace (talk) 07:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

18:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

F1 Grand Prix

Yes, for this way I put the date of the race (sunday) to be consistent with former articles.--79.50.250.127 (talk) 12:42, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

NPR Silver Award

The New Page Reviewer's Silver Award

For over 2000 new page reviews in the last year, thank you very much for your help at New Pages Patrol! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 23:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

15:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Brazilians albums on portugueses AfD

Hi, you classified Glória a Deus, Deus Reina, Pra Sempre Teu and Muralhas, which are albums from a Brazilian band, in Portugal-related AfD. I just fixed that. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 18:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

22:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Dieter Lloyd Wexler, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

  • WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

  • Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

  • A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

  • There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

  • Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

  • The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

  • Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
  • The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kelvin Gregorio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

12:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Andray Blatche

Unnamed section

Your organization of this page is bad, I want to make it more clear to everybody! Put all the Ducati Team together, same for Honda, Yang and KTM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.170.101.25 (talk) 08:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Why don’t you let more capable person organize this page? What’s your problem if some people think it’s organized better in an other way? Morbidelli said, he has no contract for next year (so you put in a false information, Marc VDS has officially parted ways with Honda for your information — Preceding unsigned comment added by EVH19845150 (talkcontribs) 09:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@EVH19845150: How come you're the more capable person if you can't even add a new section properly here and can't even sign his own message? You obviously didn't read my message. If you want to create a change that you think is "better" then create a new discussion so we can fully integrate it to all articles. Also, where is the source about the info you are giving? Babymissfortune 09:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I read your last message and be sure I will do it to make the things change for everybody!!! I repeat it to you, Marc VDS Racing Team will not be anymore with Honda in 2019, they parted ways, Michael Bartholemy and Marc VDS (the Team owner) said it clear a lot of weeks ago, it will be Yamaha or Suzuki. Morbidelli hasn’t confirm that he will be with them for 2019, just look to the last MotoGP.com free video about the contract riders for 2019, please be open and verify your information, we will talk about the rest after that — Preceding unsigned comment added by EVH19845150 (talkcontribs) 09:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Response to reverting

Sorry about that but you should've edited the total series wins, losses and winning percentage of the team too. You missed that one detail that's why I had to do it.Ralphierce (talk) 09:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Review page

Hello, can you review this page please https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Darbos ? (BLP sources) Thank you. Advim (talk) 20:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Dieter Lloyd Wexler, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)