Talk:Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Canada: Governments Stub‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Siobhanquigg (article contribs).
Request edit
It is requested that edits be made to the following semi-protected pages:
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
This page needs to be updated, but to avoid any conflicts, we'd like to suggest edits rather than making any changes ourselves. Industry Canada has a new web site with updated information about:
- Our organization
- Our mandate
- A comprehensive list of Departmental Legislation
- Key topics covered by the department including: bankruptcy corporations financing import, export and foreign investment industries and business intellectual property and copyright internet, radio and wireless science and technology and weights and measures
- A list of the 11 organizations that make up the Industry Portfolio
- And the history of Industry Canada
For editors watching this page, can you please make some edits based on current info? Lee-Anne Peluk on behalf of Industry Canada Industry Canada - Industrie Canada (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia relies on secondary sources, as oppose to the company website, for information. Also most of this is not something Wikipedia is generally interested in covering. CorporateM (Talk) 19:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding, much appreciated. Would you be open to deleting erroneous information? There are several factual inaccuracies. I can provide sources for this information. I respect the rules and as an avid user of Wikipedia, I feel that removing ROT would improve what is currently posted. Lapeluk (talk) 21:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- ok, I'm new at this and I want to be helpful. I made three small edits and cited the sources. I do work for Industry Canada, but this is my own personal time. I have read and done my best to follow all of the guidelines. I hope someone will review and validate the work, as I have corrected inaccurate information. Lapeluk (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)