User talk:SteveLamacq43
Adam Copeland
This has nothing to do with WWE.com. This is any encyclopedia, and the picture should has to be be kept updated. Edge has changed in appearence, from when that photo was taken. Which was in about 2004. Even though lita is in that picture it is still better for the infobox. Thanks. --Mikedk9109 19:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Glen Jacobs
He is not all american. So you can't say that he is. So, thats why is should be in the head. As for the disclaimer, your arguing with it by changing it to italics, which is wrong. The entry simple is Tombstone Piledriver. People don't seem to get that, and the edtiors on that page have decided to keep the disclaimer in. --Mikedk9109 16:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding The Undertaker
Experimenting? I have been doing this for quite sometime, thank you! You know, I really don't care for the Mark Calaway article, but if you want to immerse the article in the excrement of your own idiocy, fine. The man was born in 1962, like it or not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thegoodson (talk • contribs) .
Okay, I apologize for being rude, but some of the edits are just so off on the article, not to mention the rest of wikipedia. People just don't trust the info. Mark Calaway was NOT born in 1960. He was born in 1962. I watched the WWE(back when it was WWF) for over 16 years. The Undertaker, along with Bret Hart, were my favorite wrestlers. I know exactly when the Undertaker was born and every source claims 1962. Why is everyone changing it? First they had 1965 and I corrected it. Then they came up with 1964, and again I corrected. Then now, 1960? It was 1962! Some sources for that:
Why is it that on wikipedia he has to have like 3 different birthdates? User:TheGoodSon
You know, I really don't care. The man was born in 1962...I was a huge fan of the Undertaker! So you don't know where 1960 and 1965 (yes, that was there too) came from, yet you are quick to downplay several other sources that all claim 1962. It says a lot more than just opinions of various users. Man I wish I had those magazines I used to, or I wish the WWE still had the birthdates of the wrestlers on the bios at their site. Too bad... User:TheGoodSon
My talk
Hey, I was just wondering if you were criticizing the user abvove me or sticking up for me. I was confused. --Mikedk9109 (Sup) (stalk me) 00:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Haha. Alright, thanks. Hey, I was wondering if you could support my nomination to move Mark Calaway to The Undertaker. If you will then add your support to th bottom of his duscussion page. --Mikedk9109 (Sup) (stalk me) 00:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Why is Kevin Durand considered for deletion? I was allowed to create his article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 08:25, 25 October 2006.
Michael Clark Duncan's height
Please do not list him as 6' 5". He is 6' 4.5" tall [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 17:55, 25 October 2006.
I don't care whatever his height is but in the list of famous tall men he is also listed as 6' 4.5" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lieutenant Dol Grenn (talk • contribs) 12:13, 26 October 2006.
Sorry, but the list of famous tall women shouldn't start with 5' 10" because 5' 10" is not tall for me. Maybe 5' 11", but I appreciate that the list should start with 6 ft. Lieutenant Dol Grenn 17:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Women at 5' 10"
OK, I'm 6' 6" myself but I daily meet girls who are 5' 10" in height, not very tall to me. 6 ft could be tall for women. Lieutenant Dol Grenn 22:59, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
5' 10" accepted
Then the List of famous tall men should start with 6' 3". There are also famous tall actors like Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson who are under 6' 4". Lieutenant Dol Grenn 10:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)