Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates
Skip to: |
Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.
If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here. The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results. If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.
A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture. For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance. Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.
|
Featured picture tools: |
Step 1:
Evaluate Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations. |
Step 2:
Create a subpage
To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.
To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.
|
Step 3:
Transclude and link Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list ( ). |
How to comment for Candidate Images
How to comment for Delist Images
Editing candidates
Is my monitor adjusted correctly? In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting. Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting. On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate. Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended. |
- To see recent changes, .
FPCs needing feedback
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
2023 Canadian wildfires
| ||||
Albert Marco (now restored)
| ||||
Buddha of Ibiraçu |
Current nominations
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2018 at 12:30:45 (UTC)
- Reason
- Very good image, already a FP and VI on Commons WMF.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Striated heron, fr:Héron strié
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- GerifalteDelSabana (talk)
- Support as nominator – GerifalteDelSabana (talk) 12:30, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support – B dash (talk) 02:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Not as valuable as the main image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - Striking image, but not used well. If there were discussion of this bird's head, that would work great. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per Chris. Plus, moderately dark subject against quite a dark background reduces reader accessibility to image. Sca (talk) 14:33, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 07:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2018 at 09:03:55 (UTC)
- Reason
- The rainbow White House is very beautiful, also it has high EV on the LGBT issue in the U.S.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Obergefell v. Hodges, Rainbow flag (LGBT movement), Social policy of the Barack Obama administration
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Ted Eytan, uploaded by Fæ
- Support as nominator – B dash (talk) 09:03, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 12:09, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice picture, but I'm not sure I see any EV on either of those two pages that you linked. Mattximus (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per Mattximus. Plus, all colored-lights-on-structures pix seem gimmicky to me. (Pic. is three years old, so not current poltically.) Sca (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Mattximus and Sca: I have add the article about social policy of Obama, passing the same-sex marriage ruling is a notable policy of Obama. --B dash (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Fine, but the rainbow-colors illumination of the White House isn't mentioned in the text of said article, only in the caption below this picture (which appears to have been added to the article in April 2017). So EV does seem lacking. Sca (talk) 20:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- I can't see the EV, since there is no mention of this particular event of lighting up the white house in the article, and if added won't really be significant. Mattximus (talk) 19:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Matt; there needs to be more discussion for EV. Is there something about the practice of lighting up buildings in commemoration/recognition of things? That seems to common enough these days to deserve an article. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Fine, but the rainbow-colors illumination of the White House isn't mentioned in the text of said article, only in the caption below this picture (which appears to have been added to the article in April 2017). So EV does seem lacking. Sca (talk) 20:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Such as the Brandenburg Gate being lit in French colors after the 2015 Paris terrorist attacks. Nice gesture, but ephemeral and lacking significance. Sca (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC) →
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 07:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2018 at 16:58:39 (UTC)
- Reason
- high resolution of an iconic photograph, which has its own article
- Articles in which this image appears
- Combat (photograph), Max Alpert, Political commissar, Kombat (military rank), Soviet Union in World War II
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War II
- Creator
- Max Alpert, last version uploaded by RedAndr
- Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 16:58, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 13:53, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support - To me this is a good example of an image that might not make FPC on Commons, but which has very high EV such that it feels like a good fit here. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support — Marvellous Spider-Man 17:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support — B dash (talk) 14:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support - It's not the most clear picture, but the EV is there since it actually has its own page! Mattximus (talk) 14:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Promoted File:RIAN archive 543 A battalion commander.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2018 at 06:34:01 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality scan; not every day we get decent magazine covers.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Minggu Pagi, Lies Noor
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
- Creator
- Kedaulatan Rakyat Group; restored by Chris Woodrich
- Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 06:34, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support – I agree with nominator. Yann (talk) 17:00, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 13:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Weak support — Marvellous Spider-Man 17:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm iffy on the copyright status, but would probably support a crop of just the Lies Noor image. Kaldari (talk) 08:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Great quality, good EV, works for me. Mattximus (talk) 02:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- On hold I will put this nomination on hold until the DR on Commons concludes. Armbrust The Homunculus 17:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Promoted File:Minggu Pagi 6.45 (7 February 1954) cover.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 16:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- DR on Commons was closed as keep. Armbrust The Homunculus 16:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Nominations — to be closed
Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.
Older nominations requiring additional input from users
These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.
Closing procedure
A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Armbrust/closeFPC.js
When NOT promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing
{{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}}
on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.
When promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
- Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
- Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Add the image to:
- Template:Announcements/New featured content - newest on top, remove the oldest so that 15 are listed at all times.
- Wikipedia:Goings-on - newest on bottom.
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs - newest on top.
- Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
- The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
- Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
- Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
- If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
- Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
- If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}}
to the top of the section. - Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the January archive. This is done by simply adding the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}}
from this page to the bottom of the archive. - If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Delist closing procedure
Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.
If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:
- Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.
If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace the
{{Featured picture}}
tag from the image with{{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}
. - Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.
If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
- Replace the
{{Featured picture}}
tag from the delisted image with{{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}
. - Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
- Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
- Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}}
to the top of the section. - Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}}
to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive. - If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Recently closed nominations
Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2018 at 05:04:33 (UTC)
- Reason
- EV, clarity, cuteness :)
- Articles in which this image appears
- Nubian ibex
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Rhododendrites
- Support as nominator – — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 17:00, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:07, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 12:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2018 at 04:32:49 (UTC)
- Reason
- Nice spring buds of Viburnum × bodnantense in the Brooklyn Botanic Garden. I like the color and sharpness contrast between subject and background.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Viburnum
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Plants
- Creator
- Rhododendrites
- Support as nominator – — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Lots of empty space at the bottom. Might be worth cropping. Also, I'd prefer a non-crossbred specimen to illustrate Viburnum. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Personally, I like the composition, contrasting the colors and the sharp lines of the leaves in the background with the softer subject. That said, it's a good point that the composition doesn't add to the EV (probably lessens it, since the leaves are from a different plant), and that the EV is hurt by it being a hybrid. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 12:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Kuch nahi , chitiya aurat hai , back button davao! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.248.249.126 (talk) 06:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2018 at 10:42:11 (UTC)
- Reason
- high resolution and high quality portrait used as a lead image
- Articles in which this image appears
- Sandhya Jane
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Business
- Creator
- AKS.9955
- Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 10:42, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - Not FP worthy, notability and neutrality dispute on page and talk. --Janke | Talk 13:17, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per Janke. Unremarkable pic. Article is basically a stub. Sca (talk) 13:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Level of airbrushing borders on absurd Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:50, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2018 at 16:15:07 (UTC)
- Reason
- The current video is encoded with Theora at too low a bitrate, which give noticeable compression artifacts to the video. This encode is done with VP9 and Opus, which give virtually lossless image and audio compared to the original. It also have the benefit of being decodable directly by web-browsers.
- Multi-threaded decoding has been enabled for VP9 to speed up decoding.
- The Theora encode has its color primaries improperly set, which result in the colors being rendered incorrectly. This has also been fixed in this encode.
- Articles this image appears in
- Nuclear power, Pressurized water reactor
- Previous nomination/s
- Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Diagram of the Operation of a Nuclear Reactor in a Standard Nuclear Power Plant
- Nominator
- FakeShemp (talk)
Delist— FakeShemp (talk) 16:15, 26 June 2018 (UTC)- Comment You meant to say "replace" to, right? Armbrust The Homunculus 09:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delist and Replace Ehm... yes... *feels stupid* FakeShemp (talk) 09:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment You meant to say "replace" to, right? Armbrust The Homunculus 09:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delist and Replace – Bammesk (talk) 01:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delist and Replace – Kaldari (talk) 21:50, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delist and Replace – Mattximus (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delist and Replace – Janke | Talk 09:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Replaced with File:PWR nuclear power plant animation.webm --Armbrust The Homunculus 03:54, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2018 at 10:55:49 (UTC)
- Reason
- Never done this before, but I figured I'd give it a go. Found this a while ago while digging through a few hundred, maybe a thousand or more images from this LOC dump on Commons. Just a visually striking image of the type that made me super interested to figure out who this guy was, and then wound up writing his article, and a then a bunch of related articles. Turns out he wasn't just a native but was widely described as the native par excellence, and often lauded in the period papers for his striking physical appearance and stature (the guy was huge). Wound up being the archetypal physical appearance of a native on the 1922 stamp and the five dollar bill, and would have been notable only for his physical appearance even if he had not done a whole bunch of other really interesting things.
The image is a completely unedited scan with the exception of a slight crop to remove artifacts of the original glass negative. - Articles in which this image appears
- Hollow Horn Bear
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Traditional dress
- Creator
- Part of the Library of Congress Harris & Ewing collection, almost certainly taken in Washington D. C. in either 1905 or 1913 while Hollow Horn Bear was present for his participation in the respective inaugural parades. Unable to absolutely verify this beyond the context of the biography, and the original LOC description, along with the context of the collection, which is largely made up of period politicians and taken in Washington.
- Support as nominator – GMGtalk 10:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
ConditionalSupport – Quite a few scratches and dust spots; support when/if they are removed. --Janke | Talk 12:35, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm...Good point. I'll look at doing more in depth touch-ups tonight. GMGtalk 12:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Full support after restoration. --Janke | Talk 06:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support –
(Conditional Per Janke.)A face with character. High EV for a Native American leader who seems not widely known today despite his prominence in 1890-1910. Sca (talk) 13:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC) - Support - Excellent. DonFB (talk) 23:15, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Okay Janke, Sca, I threw a few hours at it and I think I've gotten it cleaned up pretty well. Lemme know what you think. I'll be honest, I haven't fired up GIMP since college, and it was definitely interesting retraining myself how to fix these kinds of things. But hopefully I did alright. GMGtalk 23:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- ⇒ Looks mighty good to me for a century-old photo. Sca (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 16:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:29, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- support©Geni (talk) 13:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Promoted File:Hollow Horn Bear LCCN 2016858434 (2) (cropped).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 10:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Suspended nominations
This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.