Jump to content

Talk:Robotic process automation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Abisys (talk | contribs) at 18:15, 22 July 2018 (RPA software vendors: fix). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBusiness Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Is it about robots, bots or both?

So is this about robots, bots or both?

For software robots the term is "bot" hence the name should be changed if it's not also about robots.

--Fixuture (talk) 17:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can't figure this out on your own by consulting the sources provided in the article or just perform a simple web search?
If the name "robotic process automation" is so widely used, should you really be changing the article title? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 May 2017

Please add Kryon Systems to the list of robotic process automation vendors as they are a reputable vendor in this field. For verification, please see their website: http://www.kryonsystems.com/ Tirtzag (talk) 10:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done:. Kryon Systems does not have an article on Wikipedia and their own website cannot be used to prove they are notible enough to be included in this article. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Resubmitting request to add Kryon Systems to list. They are mentioned as part of independent technology analyst (Forrester) review of prominent solution vendors: [1]

Company doubled in size and expanded to US: [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odoylerules201 (talkcontribs) 22:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: for the same reason as before. —KuyaBriBriTalk 16:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ LeClair, Craig. "The Forrester Wave: Robotic Process Automation, Q1 2017". www.forrester.com. Forrester Research. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
  2. ^ Stoler, Yoav. "Kryon Systems Expands Operations, Plans to Double Workforce". CTech. Retrieved 29 January 2018.

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2017

Request to add Software vendor: Softomotive (www.softomotive.com)

I would please like to kindly request that our company Softomotive is also listed in the list of RPA vendors. To justify the request, I would like to add that Softomotive is also included in RPA analyst reports such as Forrester Robotic Process Automation Wave 2017 and Everest Group RPA Matrix. 164.39.212.106 (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Does your software company have its own page? We avoid listing (per WP:NOT) entities which do not have their own Wikipedia page. Izno (talk) 16:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Company Article Request

Would an editor familiar with Robotic Process Automation be willing to look at a company article request for Instaknow? The article request can be found at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies/F-L. The article request includes multiple outside sources and multiple patents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.215.50 (talk) 19:40, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2017

Msn Murty 19:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 19:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2017

Please add WorkFusion (www.workfusion.com) to the list of RPA software providers. WorkFusion is named in every Everest, Forrester, Gartner, and HfS report on RPA and is compared alongside Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, and UI Path in RFIs/RFPs. Thank you! Adamjdevine (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2017

Add Blue Prism to the list of RPA vendors noted on the page under RPA Software Vendors:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Prism Smarterworkplace (talk) 22:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already doneKuyaBriBriTalk 17:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 November 2017

Please add JiffyRPA (www.jiffyrpa.com) as a product under RPA software vendors Iam kris (talk) 08:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Entries must have a Wikipedia article to be added. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:05, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2017

Add UiPath to list of RPA Software Vendors TRJW 13:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done - As repeatedly explained above, no article = no inclusion and UiPath does not have an article - Arjayay (talk) 15:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2018

Under the segment of "RPA software vendors" - the company Jacada should be included. The link to the company is www.Jacada.com. They are direct competitors and in several cases more notable than those already listed.

Please change: Notable RPA software vendors include:

Automation Anywhere[10] BlackLine Blue Prism[10] Datamatics EdgeVerve[10] HelpSystems Kofax[10] NICE[10] Pegasystems[10] Verint

TO

Notable RPA software vendors include:

Automation Anywhere[10] BlackLine Blue Prism[10] Datamatics EdgeVerve[10] HelpSystems Jacada Kofax[10] NICE[10] Pegasystems[10] Verint 209.155.127.130 (talk) 16:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: for the same reason as the above two requests. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2018

ADD "UiPath" to list of "RPA Vendors" <UiPath is one of the vendors listed in the 2017 Forrester Wave (10) which you've already referenced as a source for other vendors> </https://www.forrester.com/report/The+Forrester+Wave+Robotic+Process+Automation+Q1+2017/-/E-RES131182>

<UiPath just did B Round of financing (153M with Accel/KP + previous investors) this month> </https://www.pehub.com/2018/03/uipath-lands-153-mln-series-b-accel-led-round/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pehub%2Fblog+%28PE+HUB+Blog%29> 108.243.32.21 (talk) 02:51, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Tina Jones[reply]

 Not done: As explained previously, this list is for companies that already have an article in the encyclopedia, something that does not apply to UiPath. Multiple repeated requests will not change the outcome of the request until there is such an article. You can request that an article be created. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:59, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2018

Notable RPA software vendors include:

Automation Anywhere[10] BlackLine Blue Prism[10] Datamatics EdgeVerve[10] HelpSystems Jacada Kofax[10] NICE[10] Pegasystems[10] UiPath[10] Verint

Please add RatchetSoft to the list of RPA software vendors. RatchetSoft has been doing RPA since 2003, has over 500 customers, and a distribution network of 75 partners. BartFarmer (talk) 23:52, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: These claims are unreferenced. Spintendo      09:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficiently paraphrased text removal 11-MAR-2018

  1. The bulk of the removed text came from an entry made at LinkedIN:
    1. Apte, Gunesh (10 January 2018). "RPA Simplified!!! From Gunesh Apte, Freelance Trainer & Consultant". LinkedIN. Archived from the original on 11 March 2018.
  2. The link to additional removed text is here. Furthermore, if the text had been sufficiently paraphrased (which it isn't) it would still face removal, as it does not appear to originate from a WP:RS, but rather, the aforementioned LinkedIN page written by Mr. Apte.
  3. If the counter claim is that the LinkedIN text was merely copying from the Wikpedia page, then it becomes a chicken vs egg scenario, where we have no way of knowing (or proving) which came first. Spintendo      09:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2018

I request you to please add one more vendor under the sub-heading "RPA software vendors"


X-X-X-X

Name: Antworks Weblink: https://ant.works/

X-X-X-X


Supporting reason: Antworks has close to 200 full time employees, and has offices in 8 countries - Australia/India/Phillipines/Qatar/Singapore/Sri Lanka/UK/US. Antworks is a specialist player in the RPA, Digitization and Enterprise Intelligence space.

I would request you to consider Antworks as a significant RPA vendor that's suitably qualified to be added to the existing list of vendors on this page. If you need external references, please refer to news and media mentions of Antworks here https://ant.works/news-and-events


[1] [2] Sammm2000 (talk) 08:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Antworks does not have a Wikipedia article, which is a requirement for inclusion in that list - Arjayay (talk) 12:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RPA software vendors

WP is not a web directory, in my opinion a software vendor can be inserted if it is notable for some reason and the reason need to be explained in the text. --Abisys (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]