User talk:Ross11245

Welcome

Hello, Ross11245, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Ross11245, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not vandalise Wikipedia Articles as you did with foot-soldiers(disambiguation) or you will be banned from Wikipedia indefinitely. Bales Dai (talk) 06:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Bales Dai (talk) 06:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Axl Rose. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RF23 (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gable has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gable was changed by Ross11245 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890028 on 2018-07-23T08:47:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ringerfan23. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Taft, Kentucky seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RF23 (talk) 08:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Bisexuality, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. RF23 (talk) 08:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Mahabali, you may be blocked from editing. RF23 (talk) 08:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Theodore Roosevelt ‎ has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Dr. K. 02:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Ötzi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Dr. K. 02:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have been unfairly banned. I stood up for a friend and I was consequently banned for being a “Meat puppet”. Me and Bales Dai are different people. We have similar interests so that explains our editing histories (which I feel are quite different) are somewhat similar. I understand that he was recently reviewed, so I would like to be reviewed for unbanning

Thanks Ross11245 Ross11245 (talk) 01:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators are discussing this and will consider an unblock for both of you. Please be a bit patient. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That so much!! Ross11245 (talk) 02:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

I've decided to unblock you both:

Please ensure that you edit constructively. No copy pasting (copyright violations). No vandalism.

If there is anything you ever need or have any questions, please ask. Happy editing.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:02, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Psychology, you may be blocked from editing. RF23 (talk) 09:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fencing. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 18:04, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

Hi, Ross11245. I see your edits are getting reverted. I hate when that happens to me, and it does. The trick is to attach a really good source. That helps the edit be a rock! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, just added my source for Psychology. By the way I keep getting my edit on Fencing removed whenever I added a measure of kilograms to the page, do you know how I could stop this?

Thanks Ross11245 (talk) 01:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, read the edit summary in the article history. You added "... that resists a force of 800 newtons (180 lb_f) or 80 kilograms of force..." and the reverter said something like "no such thing". Well, do you have a source to make your edit stick? Without a source, it can be challenged, and was. So, here's the path: Find a source. Put the content back with the source. If it gets reverted again, do not restore it. Instead, go to the article talk page and start a discussion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:31, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your edit on psychology. I found them very helpful.

P.S thanks for citing a reliable source Psychologicalguy (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]