Jump to content

Talk:Philodendron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GoldRecluse (talk | contribs) at 05:33, 4 August 2018 (→Subgenus split). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconPlants B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name change

And which one is this, while we're at it?

This page apparently lists Arrowhead Philodendron, Nephthytis, and Syngonium podophyllum as the same thing. It says:

This species appears to have been cultivated as a houseplant since the end of the 19th century. It’s been confused botanically with an African genus, Nephthytis, which it resembles. Even though the American species were reclassified in 1879 to their own genus, the original name stuck as a common name.

So Syngonium podophyllum is the new name? And the old was something Nephthytis? — Omegatron 14:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a philodendron species that is called the heart leaf philodendron. Do you know anything about it? User:205.206.154.31 18:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC) (copied from the main article)[reply]

Edible?

At one place in the article it says all parts of the plant are poisonous. At another place it says the fruit is edible. I'd change it, but I don't know which statement is incorrect.

66.188.107.113 (talk) 02:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Tyler[reply]

Rating

I rated this a B-class, but it could definately be rated much higher if it had more pictures. For Philodendrons the variability of leaf and growth habit is so variable that an article like this really needs alot of pictures to illustrate the explanations. Chhe 21:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subgenus split

It is proposed that Philodendron subgenus Meconostigma be split off as a separate genus, Thaumatophyllum.[1] If this is accepted, the following changes species name changes will be needed, as well as changes to this article:

Thaumatophyllum is pretty well accepted by now. The genetic evidence is very strong for the change as well as important structural differences. Those species listed above ought to have notes attached referring to the change in genus. --JHill3 (talk) 05:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Sakuragui, Cassia Mônica; Calazans, Luana Silva Braucks; Oliveira, Leticia Loss de; Morais, Érica Barroso de; Benko-Iseppon, Ana Maria; Vasconcelos, Santelmo; Schrago, Carlos Eduardo Guerra; Mayo, Simon Joseph (2018). "Recognition of the genus Thaumatophyllum Schott − formerly Philodendron subg. Meconostigma (Araceae) − based on molecular and morphological evidence". PhytoKeys. 98: 51–71. doi:10.3897/phytokeys.98.25044. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Philodendron&oldid=853357500"