Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia P. Pinegar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wee Curry Monster (talk | contribs) at 00:22, 5 August 2018 (Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Patricia P. Pinegar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC. Coverage found in searches for independent, reliable sources is limited to short passing mentions and name checks. The primary sources in the article and found in searches do not serve to establish notability. North America1000 22:12, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:12, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:12, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:13, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Peterson and guant's work is a clearly indepdent one that shows notability. Add to that this source [1]. Also she was the general president of the Primary. This is a level of office that clearly without question always passes notability tests.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No opinion on the notability of this person, but the additional source is from The Universe (student newspaper), a BYU student paper whose About Us page says "The Daily Universe is committed to the mission of BYU and its sponsoring institution, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." [2] (signing this later) Bakazaka (talk) 17:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would not describe this source listed in the keep !vote directly under the nomination above as a secondary source; it's clearly primary, and primary sources do not serve to establish notability. Wikipedia notability standards and those who the LDS church considers notable is not necessarily always going to be congruent. North America1000 17:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]