Talk:Go, God. Go!

Erin Grey?

I don't know anything about this trivia reference, so I won't change it myself, but is the Erin Grey in the episode supposed to be Erin Gray the actress? If so, the spelling of her name should be fixed and wikified. Dihard 03:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Devout Catholic Family?

This should be removed from the "Mistakes" portion of the main article since there are plenty of individual Catholics who have a problem with evolution. The South Park writers weren't trying to make a statement about the proclaimed church doctrine of the Catholic Church thus they did not mistake its theology.

I think this point deserves mention in the article, thought maybe not labeled as a "mistake."

How is mention of this "irrelevant?"

Official Name of Episode

I have moved the article Go God Go to this page, as the official name of the episode is Go, God. Go! Part II, and not Go God Go. -- Ubergenius 15:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know why it is called Part II?...LazyManJackson 20:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't, but being that the plot has something to do with time travel, I can only assume this is going to be a play on time shifts. Perhaps the end of the 2 parter will be shown first? Anything I offer would only be speculation, but the title definately has "Part 2" in it. -- Ubergenius 20:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be cool, part II first, but it might get confusing, anyway, can't wait!...

Now they changed back the title to TBA, maybe it won't be go god go..

Hmm... Interesting. I don't think I've ever seen them pick a title, and then change it back like that. Kinda neat! Will be watching vigilantly to change the article if necessary... -- Ubergenius 13:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In my DirecTV chanel, the creation part seems to be removed and it only mentions the game of cartman. I don't know. --SangP 01:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it will be an episode about wikipedia, and how freaks always think of some cultural reference about stuff in SP, but it's always wrong, and insist on minutiae, and fight about wheather it's Manbearpig or ManBearPig. It's Manbearpig btw! :))) They are setting us up! Bahati 08:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1] has annonced that the name of the next episode is "Go God Go". Anyway, we'll find out the truth very soon.--Vitriden 14:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It STILL is said to be "TBA" on southparkstudios.com... Maybe the actual name of the episode is TBA? lol -- Ubergenius 16:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the fact that the official name is uncertain should be mentioned in the description. Tdewey

Edited top. Will take out as soon as we have an official title. Tdewey 21:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impresson that "Go, Dog, Go! Part II" was the name of the video game Cartman was trying to get that the description mentions. Just throwing that our there as a possibility. --Rexisfed 00:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Cox's TV Listings it is "Go, God. Go! Part II" Toadthetoad 07:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Currently it is listed as TBA, it is for sure not Go, God, Go! Part II.

Maybe Part I as its a 2-parter.

Having the parts reversed might be a nod to the time travel showcased, since we know at the end of part II/I Cartman somehow wheels backwards through time. Mewchu11 04:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Southparkstudios still lists it as TBA. Also we don't know if this is a 2 or 3 parter (seems unlikely but I've seen speculation that it might be). Tdewey 16:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain

refrain from adding stuff like "this is the second time south park made two parts" because that is not a trivia but an uneccesary ordering. I could say anything like this is the first time Catman tried freezing himself.--SangP 04:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nixon reference? Seriously?

I'm removing the following from the article:

Mrs.Garrison often calls Richard Dawkins - Dick, which is an allusion to ex-president Richard Nixon who was also known as Dick.

-I thought the unfreezing sequence was kind of like the movie AI more than Futurama.

That's a bit of a stretch, isn't it? I'm pretty sure people named Richard were using Dick as a nickname long before Nixon. How is this an allusion? If anything, I thought Miss Garrison just liked to say that name. —TheMuuj ^Talk

Nevermind. Somebody else already made the change. —TheMuuj ^Ta

lk 04:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Garrison Dawkins

I thought the music after they had brutal sex was the music from the end of Jurassic park...maybe i just heard it incorrectly?

On sps they say it is from the new Battlestar Galactica. Tdewey 23:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

This trivia:

Though Mrs. Garrison calls Dawkins her first "real" date as a woman, she mentions having sex with several men in "Mr. Garrison's Fancy New Vagina."

Is somewhat questionable. I wont remove it, but having sex is not the same as a date. -- Ubergenius 14:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added correct date for Trey/Matt interview. Tdewey 20:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dune/Serenity reference -- Need to see it again but was the ship of atheist band #2 a Serenity reference? And its been ages since I've seen Dune but were the blond atheists a Dune ref? Tdewey 21:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable pop-culture reference

"New New Hampshire" might be a reference to the Free State Project's secession option.

I think that's kind of stretching it, and it's also worth noting that the Free State Project denies being a secessionist movement: Free State Project FAQ --Redeagle688 16:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It might also be a reference to a joke in Futurama, where New York has become New New York.

Clones

I'm pretty sure all the humans are cloned. Review the video on comedy central of fatboy's unfreezing. Tdewey 21:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. Rewatching it only the initial group appear to be clones. Tdewey 03:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"EV" Games? Matt & Trey want a Wii?

Can anyone read the full name of EV Games? It's "Electronic V..." But I can't make out what the second word is.

And is there any proof that the show's creators are anticipating Nintendo's next console? --BPM 23:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added citation for the statement the creators are anticipating the release, but I'm a noob and I'm not sure how to add it to the references section. If an experienced person could do it, here is the citation [2] --ObidAlor 00:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remeber the exact scene, but perhaps it's Electronic Video Games? That would probaly go under independent research though, huh.... Chocolate Panda 03:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

this article definately needs major clean-up. I have kept posting to stop putting "This is the 2nd time x happend" Seriously... this is extremely redundant... could work for anything like "This is the 2nd time Mr.Garrison is seen having gay butt sex"