Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenfield Advisors (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Sandstein (talk | contribs) at 09:27, 9 August 2018 (Greenfield Advisors: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greenfield Advisors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable private company. All of the references are run of the mill mentions in niche industry publications. Fails WP:NCORP. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The previous AfD close would qualify as a WP:BADNAC, at least by today's standards. -- RoySmith (talk) 10:17, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no significant coverage in the reliable/independent sources available, either as Greenfield or Mundy Associates. Even within those sources it usually fell into WP:ROUTINE. There were a few quotes, especially on effects of views on prices, but nothing actually informing about the company. Definitely no indication of passing WP:NCORP. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (gab) 15:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.