Talk:Computerworld

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Computerworld article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

TfD nomination of Template:Computer Magazines

Template:Computer Magazines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Fourohfour 13:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Notice included here to get attention of unbiased cross-section of potentially interested parties. TfDs and this template don't seem to get much attention on their own, but this template appears in lots of articles.) Fourohfour 13:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Secondary Sources

Despite the popularity of this magazine, I've not yet found a reliable secondary source that talks of the magazine itself. Editors should try hard to identify such to forestall potential nomination for deletion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ceyockey, lead here by example: try harder. 68.161.231.44 (talk) 13:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Horizon Awards page

The article on the "Horizon Awards" was successfully nominated for procedural deletion between 15-20 November 2008. However the Awards appear at least marginally notable so I have merged the content into this page. I didn't include the extensive list of previous winners (which can be seen here) as they would overwhelm this short article and can just as easily be viewed at the Computerworld website.

On the surface this appears an uncontroversial merge, but if there are any disagreements please raise them here so a consensus can be reached either way. Euryalus (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

poltical

a large portion of the articles in the magazine are political. Anyone else here actually read this thing? Or are they just assuming a revert is easier? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mostly home (talk • contribs) 20:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know about it being PRESENTLY or even RECENTLY political, but it was important weekly reading for computer professionals, meaning IBM Mainframe & DeBunch people. Even if what you say is true, then make this a history-of article. Pi314m (talk) 21:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]