User talk:Eugen Simion 14/Archive 1

2007 discussions

Outbreak in Romania

Thank you for informing me about my mistake. I have now corrected it. Notelitten (talk) 20:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Rémy Di Gregorio, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. A tag has been placed on Rémy Di Gregorio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Coren 14:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intertoto Cup 2007

Please do not add fantasy results for games yet to be played. This is vandalism pure and simple and is not welcome on Wikipedia. - fchd 09:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Patriarch Teoctist

Hi! I am mainly user of the greek wikipedia and I see on all Wikis that Patriarch Teoctist died today. Unfortunately, I could not verify it. Can you please give me any link verifying it? Thank you in advance.--Kostisl 21:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Champions League 2007-08

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to UEFA Champions League 2007-08, you will be blocked from editing. - PeeJay 09:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should not post insulting comments about other teams, in this case, BATE Borisov. Don't do it again or you will be reported to an admin. - PeeJay 09:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:ABCD0013.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:ABCD0013.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2007 Vuelta a España, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-Andrew c ^[talk] 17:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Logo cab.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo cab.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gino Minune!

Buna fratele meu;

Contributiile tale recente sunt foarte apreciate. Sper sa continui pe parcursul asta. Sanatate si sa-ti moara dusmanii! --Thus Spake Anittas 22:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Paris-Tours

A tag has been placed on 2007 Paris-Tours requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rudget _{Contributions} 14:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2010 FIFA World Cup. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. – Pee Jay 17:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2010 FIFA World Cup, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Garavello 17:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Change of username

Hey Simion, how's it going? It looks like you changed your username yoursself? Do you know about WP:CHU? I strongly recommend you use that to officially change your name. For one thing, User:Simion Eugen-Andrei, Bucharest, Romania is not registerred, and someone could register it and steal it. Also, the difference in usernames is causing some problems with people trying to leave you messages and so on. It will continue to be a problem in a lot of different ways. The process to change your name at WP:CHU is not hard at all and I can help you if you like. Just leave me a message on my talk page, so I can know what you plan to do. Thanks! Peace, delldot talk 17:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've moved your talk page back to "User talk:Simion Eugen-Andrei, Bucharest, Romania", so now you'll see new messages. I have left your userpage, however. If you want to get a username change, go to Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the instructions there. Thank you. Acalamari 21:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Deaths in 2007 page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. tomasz. 18:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Deaths in 2007, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. tomasz. 18:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Deaths in 2007. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Smashville^BONK! 18:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Cheers, CP 18:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2008 discussions

2008 Africa Cup of Nations

Please do not update scores until games are finished. michfan2123 (talk) 17:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted images

Please do not upload copyrighted images with fake licenses as you did with Image:Heathl.jpg, or you will be blocked from editing. miranda 14:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior is being discussed on ANI. miranda 15:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked 48 hours for gross incivility at User talk:Miranda, specifically this diff which she has rightly removed from her talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 15:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage/Username

Please do not move your userpage to a different name than your username. Please see Wikipedia:Changing username to see how to move all your contributions and your userpage to the name you desire. Thank you. — Save_Us † 15:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Bennati in the golden jersey.JPG, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Image:Bennati in the golden jersey.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Bennati in the golden jersey.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Bennati in the golden jersey.JPG]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Bennati in the golden jersey.JPG]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Bennati in the golden jersey.JPG]].

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Diagonal P. (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EP020.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:EP020.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yonatan ^talk 23:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Toure.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Toure.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yonatan ^talk 23:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask for your user name to be changed. Moving your user\user talk page does not achieve this. You can request to have it changed at WP:CHU. Yonatan ^talk 23:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

African Cup of Nations picture gallery

A gallery of images from the ACoN is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia. If you can place the images in appropriate places within the article, please do so. If not, please upload them to Wikimedia Commons. Thank you. – Pee Jay 15:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright warning

You have been warned about copyright problems multiple times in the past. 2008 Nicolas Sarkozy Romania Official Visit, an article you just created, was deleted as a straight copyright violation. Please be more careful in your edits, or you will be blocked. Fram (talk) 14:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As the image Image:Preston Reagan.jpg was uploaded with a patently false license, you may consider this your final warning before receiving a much longer block. Fram (talk) 14:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...and others like Image:Image0203-1628(TV12)-1-.jpg (TV screenshots under a cc-by-sa license? I have my doubts). Fram (talk) 14:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inserting unsourced and at first glance wholly incorrect information

If you pronounce people dead, like you did with Reagan Gomez-Preston, please provide reliable sources (I couldn't find any), and a correct date (dates in the future will rarely be correct...). I have reverted these edits of yours as well (just like quite a few others). Please be a lot more careful in your edits in the future. Fram (talk) 15:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, your edit at UEFA Euro 2008 broadcasting rights was unsourced and was contradicted by the available sources. Unless you provide sourecs for such edits, it looks like you are deliberately inserting false information in Wikipedia, which is another reason you may get blocked if you continue like this. Fram (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:ABCD00061.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ABCD00061.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soxred93 | talk count bot 13:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:ABCD00061.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:ABCD00061.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:ABCD00061.JPG|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soxred93 | talk count bot 14:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aleea Dorohoi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Aleea Dorohoi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Aleea Dorohoi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Aleea Dorohoi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soxred93 | talk count bot 03:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Steven Phillip Kazmierczak. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. User:Dorftrottel 16:11, February 15, 2008 16:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Image:Max Banus.jpg

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as File:Max Banus.jpg, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://evz.ro/pictures/articles/normal/7dfaae42a2de3b16a413664eb1084b0e.jpg, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Max Banus.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Max Banus.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Max Banus.jpg]].

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [[Talk:Image:Max Banus.jpg/Temp]]. Leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Max Banus.jpg]] saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! bogdan (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Paris-Nice

Hi, could you please engage in discussion at the discussion page before reverting 2008 Paris-Nice again, I would like to understand your reasoning and I have explained mine there. Thanks, Severo^TC 18:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you could engage in English at the relevant talk page it would be great, thanks. Severo^TC 18:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacking other users

Regarding this: Personal attacks are not allowed at Wikipedia, no matter what languages they're in. If you continue using such language and attacking other users, you will get blocked from editing. bogdan (talk) 23:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Area of Serbia

You have recently changed Serbia's area as to represent the state without Kosovo. I do not care about the issue itself, i.e. whether or not Kosovo should be treated as an independent country. However, you might have noticed that there is a huge discussion going on between users, who do care a lot. It seems a good idea for you to join these discussions and urge consensus rather than just changing back what others changed forth and indulge in a revert edit war.

What concerns me even more: While you feel free to change the area in km^2, you do not care to make the consistent change for the area in miles^2. I may wonder as to why. Please acknowledge that this kind of behavior harms the quality of wikipedia as a source for information. Tomeasy (talk) 18:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Amazing Race 13

Please explain what you are looking for with adding the {{update}} template to the page. I noted in removing it previously that there are no new news items about the race beyond what is there, so unless you are aware of some aspect that has been recently reported, it's hard to understand what information you are looking for updates on. --MASEM 20:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paris-nice2008.jpg

Stop uploading images taken from the web and claiming they were made by you. On the image itself it was written "Copyright Societé du Tour de France". bogdan (talk) 22:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tirreno-Adriatico

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Tirreno-Adriatico, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Severo^TC 16:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User name change, again

You have again moved your user page and talk page to a different name. It has been pointed out to you twice before that you should not be doing this, but need to go through Wikipedia:Changing username. Please stop this, as it is getting disruptive. Fram (talk) 08:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1 week block

You were warned multiple times for not inserting copyrighted material on Wikipedia, and to stop uploading copyrighted images with false (public domain) licenses. You claimed that Image:Enigma ft. Sarah Brightman - Eden.ogg, a 3 minute sound file, was "public domain" yesterday. The file has been deleted. Since this is your third block, with multiple warnings for a variety of problems inbetween, you have now been blocked for one week. Please be more careful with your edits and uploads in the future, you seem to be willing to be a constructive editor and it would be a shame if you would be blocked for a really long time. Fram (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

I'm so sorry, I promise, I will not encrouch the Wikipedia Law. Please unblock me!

The Amazing Race 13 again

Unless you meant that the casting interviews should've already been held, please don't add that template without a reason. Thanks! ♥Shapiros10 Wuz Here♥ 19:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For several times, include Masem and Shipiros10, they have voice to you about no need to put {{update}} tag into The Amazing Race 13, however you didn't take they word seriously. If you not an expert in certain topic, do not abuse the tag. We are the man normally will take a look on it when have news to be updated. So, please take my word seriously, and please, don't add {{update}} tag again because it is unnecessary, such action will claim you as vandalism. --Aleen f1 11:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is nothing to be update, unless you have official news release. Such as your claim in The Amazing Race 13 talk page is more like original research. Please stop. --Aleen f1 11:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 2008 Putin in Bucharest

A tag has been placed on 2008 Putin in Bucharest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. JamieS93 16:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Serbia

Hi Simion. I reverted your edit on Serbia. You changed its surface area in km^2 from ca. 88000 to ca. 77000. Here are the reasons for my revert:

You did not give a summary. Please, always do this in the future. It helps a great deal to judge the credibility of an edit.
You did not conduct the accorded change to the surface area in miles^2 and thus exposed this wikipedia article to an illogical inconsistency. Please, make sure in the future that you oversee the implied consequences of edits you conduct.
Your edit was not inline with the state that the article currently intends to represent. You might have noticed that the map in the info box displays Serbia including Kosovo. In this respect, you introduced another inconsistency in the article.
Most important: Your edit targeted a currently hot-disputed topic. Namely, should Kosovo be considered part of Serbia or not. If you want to voice your opinion with respect to this question please do so on the respective talk page. This is the place where you should spend energy in order to convince people of your POV. As a result of this, the map and all accorded figures might be changed according to your views. Please avoid indulging in senseless edit warring in the future.

Thank you. Tomeasy (talk) 14:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article , suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on . Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of . Triwbe (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2008 Vuelta al País Vasco. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Severo^TC 19:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2008 Vuelta al País Vasco. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Severo^TC 20:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly warning

Hi. This isn't really worth another vandalism warning, but more a friendly warning as some of your recent editing, especially in the 2008 Vuelta al País Vasco article, has been disruptive. You are very welcome to edit Wikipedia, but edits such as [1] is just vandalism. I noticed you updated the article with [2], but then [3] and [4] seem completely unnecessary and was spamming the page with {{update}} templates. Finally, with regards [5], this is striking your own edit, (so, if anyone was not paying attention, it was you!) and if have realised it was wrong, what prevented you from changing it? Everyone is welcome to constructively contribute to Wikipedia, so I ask you to do more of the constructive rather than disruptive stuff. Regards, Severo^TC 10:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove a message that says "Please do not remove this message"

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal. Your removal of this template has been reverted. Thank you. This refers to this edit. --Sebastian (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reactions to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake

Hi,

Would you mind explaining why you deleted the AfD box from the top of this page?

Thanks,

-- Chzz ► 16:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Giro d'Italia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2008 Giro d'Italia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. The 9th stage is not over yet, and there is no need to show a empty table. Please insert useful information the next time you show this table, and use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. lil2mas (talk) 15:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your name

Greetings from Bulgaria! I would like to inform you that your name in Russian is spelt incorrectly. It should be Симион К. Еуджен-Aндрей, not Симиоп К. Еугеп-Aндреи. дж is used for the sound of the English letter j, the Cyrillic letter п corresponds to Latin p and й is short i, which is appropriate in this case. My native language uses the Cyrillic script, so you can trust me. Also, Σιμιον Κ. Ευγεν-Ανδρει in Greek should transliterate in Latin as Simion K. Evgen-Andri, but I cannot tell you about how the correct name should appear. I cannot tell you anything about the name in Arabic or Chinese either, but I hope they are correct. You'd better ask someone who knows these languages. --212.36.9.133 (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Google Street View locations

Please do not remove AfD messages until the discussion has completed. The Wikipedia administrators will remove the message when they look over and decide how to deal with the AfD. Your edit to List of Google Street View locations was reverted. Marc Kupper (talk) (contribs) 19:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruslana Korshunova pics uploaded as PD-Self

The following three notices are for pictures of Ruslana Korshunova that were uploaded as PD-Self. You were previously blocked for false PD-self claims, so I think you need to be more careful here. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 22:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Ruslana Korshunova.JPG

An image that you uploaded, Image:Ruslana Korshunova.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ChrisRuvolo (t) 22:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:DSC01595.JPG

An image that you uploaded, Image:DSC01595.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ChrisRuvolo (t) 22:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:DSC01596.JPG

An image that you uploaded, Image:DSC01596.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ChrisRuvolo (t) 22:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI post

An ANI post on the content of your userpage has been ongoing. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 09:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime, I have deleted your userpage. People take death notes on pages seriously and it tends to upset them. So please don't write them. We are here to write an encylopedia, keep that in mind. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 10:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that the folks as ANI disagree about the deletion, so I have restored your page minus the suicide note, date of death etc. Do not re add them. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 10:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank God. Well, Wikipedia is NOT a place for jokes anyway...Btw we just wanted to see a fellow Wikipedian to be safe and fine...But Please.. No more jokes like these :) -- Tinu Cherian -

-- Tinu Cherian - has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! This should make your day better -- Tinu Cherian - 11:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Well, I'm glad you're safe. That's the main thing here ... - Alison ^❤ 11:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Islaammaged126 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Islaammaged126 (talk) 13:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i am so glad you are safe.! :).Islaammaged126 (talk) 13:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What a cute puppy!

Islaammaged126 (talk) has given you a doggy! Doggies promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day much better. Spread WikiLove by placing a doggy on other user's talk pages by adding {{Doggy}} to their talk page.Happy editing!

Islaammaged126 (talk) 13:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diacritics - Summer Olympics 2008

I will try to repair the diacritics, but my reference is without diacritics, so I'd prefer not to guess them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgegh (talk • contribs) 03:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits on Liga I 2008-09

Hello,

First of all, this is not a warning but rather some friendly advice.

I noticed that you were editing the results box of Liga I 2008-09. Thank you for doing so. Nevertheless, it would be great if you would edit the standings as well because it is a little strange when the Results are updated, but the Standings are not.

Further, please refrain from giving "live updates" for games in progress. Wikipedia is not a news agency. The mechanism providing content within the small-tags should just be used to give information such as postponement messages, the date of a rescheduled game or the tagging of next round's games.

Finally, if date information should be given on a game, please do so by using the English standard formatting (either DD/MM or MM/DD).

Regards, Hockey-holic (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Juntos1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Juntos1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Amazing Race 13. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aleen f1 11:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Amazing Race 13. You will be blocked from editing. --ApprenticeFan (talk) 07:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If vandalism continues, you will be banned from Wikipedia to never edit any articles again. --ApprenticeFan (talk) 07:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 FIA GT Bucharest 2 Hours

Please do not create articles such as this which only feature one sentence and do nothing to actually describe the event. These are likely to be quickly deleted. If you want to start an article about an event, please provide some actual content. The359 (talk) 20:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Port-au-Price2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Port-au-Price2007.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ştefan Iordache

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ştefan Iordache, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CalendarWatcher (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On that note, I've also nominated the picture of Iordache you put up. Would you mind identifying the source here so it can be deleted faster? Thanks. Biruitorul ^Talk 01:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Or, you could identify the source of the image and explain why it can't be replaced with a "free" image. (It is presumably not possible to create a new photo of the late Mr. Iordache!) In which case it is possible that the image would not be deleted at all. Crypticfirefly (talk) 03:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Luica.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Luica.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I appreciate your comment and I encourage you to start or edit that league and cup articles even more.SonjiCeli (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 12 October, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) 2008 Chechnya earthquake, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦^C 18:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Could you please add results of the upcoming round of Cupa României 2008–09 because it seems that official page of the Romanian Football Federation is completely outdated?--SonjiCeli (talk) 19:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm from Croatia. And it's not that I'm especially interested in Romanian Cup. I'm overall interested in this year's European football leagues and cups (Cup of Portugal 2008-09, Russian Cup 2008-09 and some other are my works), but Romanian Cup was an easy target because it was very poor when I started editing articles.--SonjiCeli (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Cupa României 2008–09 in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Megaman en m (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View

Why on earth did I type November?!?!?!? D'oh! Thanks for sorting that out. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 13:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please don't add blanket copyrighted text into Wikipedia articles, as you did with 2008 Yevpatoria gas explosion. Daniel (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Wikipedia policy prohibits links to copyright violations. On your user page, nearly every entry in your "lyrics" column was to a site that violates copyrights by posting lyrics without permission (LyricWiki.org, azlyrics.com, etc.), and your video links were primarily to copyright violating videos. I've removed both columns. Please do not restore them.—Kww(talk) 01:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LyricWiki is a royalty paying lyrics site. At any rate, WP:UP#NOT does not state that such links are not allowed on a User page. Removing items from a User page is generally discouraged, however. KieferFL (talk) 05:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2009 discussions

2009 Dakar Rally

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits(You wrote:Nobody wants to edit?? That's no good for this important event...I edited the first stage...stage 2 it's for you). Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. ----Greatestrowerever^{Talk Page} 17:14, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SimionE.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:SimionE.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi

What do you say about the new Portal:Romanian football? Mario1987 18:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of NORC (service)

I have nominated NORC (service), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NORC (service). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Pavel Cristian Balaj

A tag has been placed on Pavel Cristian Balaj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Macromonkey (talk) 12:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carpatair Flight 128

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Carpatair Flight 128, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable non-injury minor damage accident

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MilborneOne (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AE sanctions

The {{GSVadditions}} template is currently subject to Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/The_Troubles#Final_remedies_for_AE_case, as laid out during a previous WP:AE case that closed October 05, 2008. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first.

Please note: All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, the Baronetcies, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under 1RR. When in doubt, assume it is related.

Any article with edit warring over the Ulster Banner automatically comes under the banner of these sanctions, and 1RR applies. O Fenian (talk) 14:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Street View image

File:Google street view.JPG is a good image! Why don't you upload this image in wikipedia commons? And so, a lot of people can use it in various language's wikipedia. --61.26.82.42 (talk) 10:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing templates from the top of sections,...

...especially when those ask for participation in a discussion on a talk page, should not be removed until there is a consensus. However, you are heartily invited to participate in the discussion. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 11:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Ireland Flag

I wish to sustain the use of the Northern Ireland flag at Google Street View.--The Maiden City (talk) 00:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added comment here [6] as you suggested --The Maiden City (talk) 08:51, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 581 e

Thanks for the nomination and I like the article, but I was wondering if you could expand the article a bit further before it is put on Main Page. Are you willing to work on it? --BorgQueen (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Gliese 581 e

On 22 April, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Gliese 581 e, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

Lucky you. --BorgQueen (talk) 21:35, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cutremur

Asta e... Mersi pentru mesaj. :D jjmihai 08:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Attack car 2009.PNG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Attack car 2009.PNG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moving

Since the page appears to be fairly well established now and most editors appear to agree with the title, please don't move it again without discussing this on the Talk page first. Thanks. Yintaɳ 20:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire

I have nominated 2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current Events

While links are bolded in the "In the news" section on the main page, they are not bolded in the current events portal. Please keep this in mind when editing. Thanks for your contribution. Tomdobb (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View

Hi TouLouse. Here is the link to the high quality images along Collins Ave. area of Miami Beach [7] It only seems to be a small area with the high quality images. There's also a small area of high quality images at the intersection of Alton Rd and 41st St, also in Miami Beach. [8] and also Sepulveda Blvd near Los Angeles airport [9] Aurora30 (talk) 21:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think YOU have a major problem for caring so damn much. I am simply trying to improve street view and you have NO RIGHT to interfere with that. Seems like you yourself are really helpful in that a lot of your proposed 'entries' into Wikipedia are REJECTED. Leave well enough alone, noob, I'll keep adding this information if you keep deleting it.

Hi, if information has no source should I insert a citation or just remove it, im not too sure? MSalmon (talk) 15:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Eurovision Song Contest 2010. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 20:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicu Constantin

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nicu Constantin, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0176046. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. AeonicOmega talk 19:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2009 Yambol bus crash

On 29 May, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Yambol bus crash, which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^{T♦Nominate!} 02:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Simion, I realized I never thanked you for promptly creating the 2009 Yambol bus crash article, for your respect and support. So here's a big thank you! It's great to know that people care and especially that your neighbours support you in good or bad. All the best, Todor →Bozhinov 20:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-Birthday

It looks like you've been on Wikipedia exactly two years today. Happy Wiki-Birthday! I hope you have a great day, and keep up the good work around here. – Quadell ^(talk) 01:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Profanity in edit summaries

TouLouse, please do not use profanity in edit summaries when it is not relevant to the subject, as you recently did with Google Street View. Edit summaries cannot easily be reverted, and this does not help in giving the encyclopedia a respectable appearance.

I know vandalism can be really frustrating. But if the vandalism really bothers you, please revert it and simply say in a more civilized manner something like "identified as vandalism," then warn the vandal following the instructions on that page. If you would like to know where it is appropriate to use profanity on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Profanity. Sebwite (talk) 14:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Papua New Guinea earthquake

I noticed you created the article 2009 Papua New Guinea earthquake, and I'm interested to know the significance? It occurred in the middle of the ocean away from populated areas, and there have been at least 20 earthquakes of this size or larger in the Papua New Guinea area since the 1998 Papua New Guinea earthquake (which was significant because it killed over 2,000 people), so the notability of the recent event lies in question, and may constitute recentism. RapidR (talk) 15:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A reply to your ITN nominations

Hi, TouLouse! :D Is there further information on the 2009 Papua New Guinea earthquake (as it needs more to go on the Main Page)? Maybe [10] [11] [12] might help to start? Although it says there are no deaths and no damage... also, is there anything else about the Romanian mummy (as YouTube videos won't work for that)? Thanks for he nominations! :D --can dle •wicke 19:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 French helicopter crash

I have nominated 2009 French helicopter crash, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 French helicopter crash. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThaddeusB (talk) 23:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In The News

On 30 June, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Hunan train collision, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--–Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aviation incidents and accidents in 2009

As I dont believe that this template you created adds and value to the articles I have brought it up for discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation/Aviation_accident_task_force#Template:Aviation_incidents_and_accidents_in_2009. Your comments would be welcome. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 14:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Mihăileşti explosion

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mihăileşti explosion, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://soj.weblog.ro/2004-05-24/10202/Deadly-Explosion-in-Mihailesti.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mihăileşti explosion and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mihăileşti explosion with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mihăileşti explosion. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mihăileşti explosion saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Greetings. I'm very concerned about the copyright violations you've added to Wikipedia. I understand that you want to improve Wikipedia, and that your intentions are good, but it's just unacceptable for you to copy-and-paste entire sentences from copyrighted works into Wikipedia. I see that you've been blocked for this before, and promised not to do it again, but then I see that the problem has continued. I'd hate to see you banned from Wikipedia, since you do a lot of good work... but it's a TON of work to go through people's contributions and search for copyright violations and fix them. Please, please stop adding cut-and-pasted material into Wikipedia, or you'll be blocked, and I'd hate to see that happen. All the best, – Quadell ^(talk) 16:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am also concerned about your use of non-free materials. I've raised the question at the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Until it is archived, it can be found here. Please come provide any information you can to help clarify the matter. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing issues

On May 25, 2009, you performed a split of material to the article 2009 Rabat stampede, and I just wanted to drop you a note to point out a few things about the procedure. As Wikipedia:Split sets out, when we split material, we have to provide a direct link to the source article. This is necessary because Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material into public domain, but retain rights to authorship under the terms of our licenses, CC-By-SA and GFDL. This wikilink satisfies that requirement by allowing readers to access the history and see who contributed what and when. Usually, we put into the edit summary something along the lines of "Split from Mawazine". Then, we note the split as well in an edit summary at the source article. That would read like "Material split to 2009 Rabat stampede", in this case. This helps make sure that the article is not later deleted, as it cannot be as long as the article to which the material has been split remains. I see that others have already addressed the problems with this split, but I wanted to let you know for future use and also in case you could identify any other articles that you may have created by copying content already on Wikipedia. Attribution must be provided to those authors as well. If you have any questions about this, please feel free to let me know. I am watching your talkpage for a time. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 West Java airliner crash

I have nominated 2009 West Java airliner crash, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 West Java airliner crash. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 07:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aviation accidents and incidents

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Aviation accidents and incidents

Template:Aviation accidents and incidents has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.LeadSongDog come howl 16:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2009 Serbian MiG-29 crash

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2009 Serbian MiG-29 crash, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Military aircraft accidents are common and not really notable unless they include loss of civilian life

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MilborneOne (talk) 17:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 Peru earthquake

I have nominated 2009 Peru earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Peru earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RapidR (talk) 16:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as The Amazing Race 15 are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 00:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Street View

Hi! Busto Arsizio "minor area"? What about Bitonto, Las Rozas de Madrid and others? Bye! :-) Paolotacchi (talk) 11:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for SEACOM (cable system)

On 24 July, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article SEACOM (cable system), which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 03:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Aria Air Flight 1525

On 25 July, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Aria Air Flight 1525, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 02:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2009 Nigeria battles

On 27 July, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Nigeria battles, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--can dle •wicke 21:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Current Events Barnstar
		I award this to you for outstanding contribution to WP:ITN. Cargoking talk 15:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This award is one of four Current Events Barnstars presented to four people by Cargoking talk today.

You deserve this, I think you only write ITNs. Have a happy day but remember to help me with this 2007 Pakistani state of emergency.yousaf465'

Image description

Hello. I noticed that you uploaded this picture a while back. I'd like to move it to Commons and use it at the Romanian language Wikipedia, but it could use a small description and I'm thinking you are the best person to provide it. Is this the DN2B national road (Buzău-Brăila)? Thanks. - Andrei (talk) 11:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pentru ce? Nu vreau! Bye! TouLouse (talk) 15:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2009 Burgos bombing and 2009 Palma Nova bombing

On 31 July, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Burgos bombing, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

On 31 July, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Palma Nova bombing, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

TouLouse (talk) 12:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Continental Airlines Flight 128

The article Continental Airlines Flight 128 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication i the article of how this is notable. Looking at news reports on the incident, it doesn't appear to be notable enough to warrant an article. Emergency landing due to turbulence and some injuries.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've de-prodded the article because it appears to meet WP:AIRCRASH. The BBC have also reported on the accident. Mjroots (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2009 Sydney suicide attack

The article 2009 Sydney suicide attack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOT#NEWS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 07:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Continental Airlines Flight 128

I have nominated Continental Airlines Flight 128, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continental Airlines Flight 128. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simple Bob (talk) 11:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Vueling Airlines Flight 9127

I have nominated Vueling Airlines Flight 9127, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vueling Airlines Flight 9127. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simple Bob (talk) 18:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN/C

Could you help us over at WP:ITN/C? Where does comment on Iraq belong. We are confused! Cargoking talk 15:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sorting that out. :) Cargoking talk 15:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

H1N1 Outbreak in Romania

Hello, thanks for the image!.
Based on your image I was able to alter the map and edit the article.

Thank you! Scooter20 (talk) 20:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Nouakchott suicide bombing

Hi TouLouse. You created that article but I think maybe it has gone unnoticed under August 8 at WP:ITN/C because nobody but me (just now) actually said support or oppose. Can you give a support or oppose to clarify? --can dle •wicke 19:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 August, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Nouakchott suicide bombing, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--can dle •wicke 03:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Gripa-porcina-in-Romania-9-aug-2009.jpg)

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Gripa-porcina-in-Romania-9-aug-2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 06:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gripa-porcina-in-Romania-9-aug-2009.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gripa-porcina-in-Romania-9-aug-2009.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpaceFlight89 06:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Romanian accident

Thank you very much and you also keep up the good work. I see it hasn't been posted. I have asked why as I think it should. :D --can dle •wicke 17:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alas I do not—but I do everything else apart from posting. :D Yes, BorgQueen, Tone and also Spencer have posted most of the ITNs in 2009. Master of Puppets can also post them but I'm having a lot of difficulty getting through to him. :( David Levy can post them too but I didn't understand him under the Les Paul nomination. Several users are on holiday or not online. However, there has not been any hurry to oppose it either. :D I guess we will just have to be patient which is unfortunate I know. --can dle •wicke 19:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 August, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Romanian bus-train collision, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--can dle •wicke 20:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Tragedia de la Scanteia 1.jpg)

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Tragedia de la Scanteia 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 06:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Tragedia de la Scanteia 2.jpg)

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Tragedia de la Scanteia 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 06:09, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 4 September, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 West Java earthquake, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

On 5 September, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Ciudad Juárez rehab center attack, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

-- TouLouse (talk) 19:40, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2009 Oslo shooting

The article 2009 Oslo shooting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This looks like a news item and should stay off Wikipedia until someone writes more comprehensively about the incident

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. meco (talk) 12:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:23333.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:23333.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings

TouLouse,

Wishing you and your family a very joyful end of 2009, and the best of wishes for the coming year. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia, maybe take some time out to spend it with loved ones.

Seasons Greetings,
Cargoking talk ^{Happy Chirstmas} 21:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Mexicali earthquake

Good start. Bearian (talk) 19:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010 discussions

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to [[:2009 flu pandemic in Asia]], without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Most of the article on Wikipedia dealing with the pandemic is named "2009 flu pandemic in XXX", so there is no rationale to move 2009 flu pandemic in Asia to 2009-2010 flu pandemic in Asia. Also, there is no page move proposal proposed and no consensus has been voted so that the article may be on "2009-2010 flu... " name., JL 09 ^_{q?_c} 14:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I reverted the following page-moves:

2009 flu pandemic in Romania
2009 flu pandemic in Oceania
2009 flu pandemic in North America
2009 flu pandemic in South America
2009 flu pandemic in Africa
2009 flu pandemic in Europe (badly moved, so an RM was requested to its talk page)
and all the talk pages of the articles mentioned above

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Google Street View. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You need to first TALK about removal of article content on the article's talk page to see if there is a consensus to do so. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 22:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Google Street View. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 23:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Solar eclipse of January 15, 2010

On 15 January 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Solar eclipse of January 15, 2010, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 06:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash

On 15 January 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash, which you recently created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- TouLouse (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash

An editor has nominated 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. - Eastmain (talk) 00:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article survived the AfD, which has now been closed. - Eastmain (talk) 06:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello TouLouse! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Horia Moculescu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of 2010 Haiti earthquake aftershocks

The article List of 2010 Haiti earthquake aftershocks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sure why this should need its own article, particularly given that the only meaningful content of the page is an external link...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ╟─Treasury Tag►duumvirate─╢ 13:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of 2010 Haiti earthquake aftershocks

I have nominated List of 2010 Haiti earthquake aftershocks, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 2010 Haiti earthquake aftershocks. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ╟─Treasury Tag►constabulary─╢ 13:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2010_Haiti_earthquake#List_of_2010_Haiti_earthquake_aftershocks

Hi, I've started a discussion at Talk:2010_Haiti_earthquake#List_of_2010_Haiti_earthquake_aftershocks to figure out whether or not we want a separate article on the aftershocks. Pichpich (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: 2010 Jos riots

On 20 January 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Jos riots, which you created and recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 19:09, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Saint Kitts and Nevis general election, 2010

On 26 January 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Saint Kitts and Nevis general election, 2010, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

Thanks -Dumelow (talk) 21:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010 U.S. Military helicopter crash

The article 2010 U.S. Military helicopter crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable accident involving a military aircraft. See WP:AIRCRASH guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mjroots (talk) 10:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

May I suggest to you that you go into "my preferences", click "gadgets" and click "refTools". It is an easy way to insert the Template:Cite web. — Cargoking talk 16:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poland?

Thanks for correcting that one, things were going a little fast there, and I probably had Adam Malysz in the back of my head. Anyway, you saved me from some real embarrassment there... Lampman (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: 2010 Pune bombing

On 14 February 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Pune bombing, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 11:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: 2010 Nigeria bus electrocution

On 15 February 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Nigeria bus electrocution, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 01:04, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Austin plane crash

I have nominated 2010 Austin plane crash, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Austin plane crash. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJ Mitchell | fancy a chat? 14:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Alexander Haig

On 21 February 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Alexander Haig, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 3 March 2010 Baqubah bombings

On 4 March 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 3 March 2010 Baqubah bombings, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Dumelow (talk) 08:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: 2010 Pratapgarh stampede

On 4 March 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Pratapgarh stampede, which you created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 16:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: Vladislav Ardzinba

On 5 March 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Vladislav Ardzinba, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 15:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: 2010 Jos riots

On 8 March 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Jos riots, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 00:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: 2010 Turkey earthquake

On 8 March 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Turkey earthquake, which you recently created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- TouLouse (talk) 18:43, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Hi

You are too quick IMO. ... When renaming the quake page and creating a new one. It's an aftreshock, no new page is needed. They even downgraded the magnitude. --DAI (Δ) 17:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for March 2010 Lahore bombings

On 14 March 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article March 2010 Lahore bombings, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 12:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 British Columbia avalanche

I have nominated 2010 British Columbia avalanche, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 British Columbia avalanche. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 14:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

I have nominated an article you created for DYK at Template talk:Did_you_know#Articles created/expanded_on March 11. Needs to be expanded before we can put it up which I can help with.Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 19:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for March 2010 Chile earthquake

On March 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article March 2010 Chile earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 Gent–Wevelgem

A tag has been placed on 2010 Gent–Wevelgem, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Boing! said Zebedee 17:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TAR16

L'Église de Massiges is a separate route marker in the leg. After the U-Turn, teams are directed to the church by their next clue.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash

Template:2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 16:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 West Bengal storm

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 West Bengal storm

A tag has been placed on 2010 West Bengal storm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: according to wikipedia's notability criteria 1 sentence is not a notable article. Perhaps mention for this can go to a list of 2010 storms/nat'l disasters.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Lihaas (talk) 09:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ps- woops for the double add. wikipedia said i had an edit conflcit and then added this twice

ITN: 2010 eastern Indian nor'wester

On 14 April 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 eastern Indian nor'wester, which you created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 23:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Kurmanbek Bakiyev

On 16 April 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Kurmanbek Bakiyev, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:38, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for April 2010 Kohat bombings

On 18 April 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article April 2010 Kohat bombings, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: April 2010 Baghdad bombings

On 25 April 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article April 2010 Baghdad bombings, which you created and recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 18:33, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: Waragi

On 26 April 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Waragi, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 00:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Coverage details of Google Maps

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Coverage details of Google Maps. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coverage details of Google Maps. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00054.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSC00054.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010 Napa County earthquake mistake

The article 2010 Napa County earthquake mistake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article about an earthquake that did not happen? Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00054.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC00054.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of 2010 Imperial County earthquake

The article 2010 Imperial County earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTNEWS and fails WP:EVENT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mike moral ♪♫ 19:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010 Offshore Oregon earthquake

The article 2010 Offshore Oregon earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTNEWS and fails WP:EVENT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mike moral ♪♫ 20:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello?

SiMioN.EuGeN, I replied to your post on my talkpage re my question about the May 2010 Sumatra earthquake map, but you appear to have deleted it almost as soon as I posted it. Have I offended you somehow? --220.101.28.25 (talk) 15:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010 Southeast Taiwan earthquake

The article 2010 Southeast Taiwan earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTNEWS and fails WP:EVENT. Shindo 2/3 is pretty low on that scale.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aditya Ex Machina 14:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Earthquakes

I would just like to let you know that you shouldn't go around creating pages for earthquakes unless they are connected to something big. Already, I have seen three articles that have been proposed for deletion. I have just proposed another, the 2010 Algeria earthquake for deletion as well. I would recommend that you read up on the notability guidelines before you go any further as I don't think you should be discouraged from editing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:44, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You could always try Wikinews- we're always grateful of another pair of hands over there and we welcome articles on earthquakes, even if they're not notable enough for WP. It's not second place, it's just a different wiki. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:11, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to take a look at Wikinews' page on writing articles. Mike moral ♪♫ 19:14, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Algeria earthquake

I have nominated 2010 Algeria earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Algeria earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mike moral ♪♫ 19:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 Afghanistan plane crash

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on 2010 Afghanistan plane crash, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sophie :# 11:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 2010 Afghanistan plane crash

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, 2010 Afghanistan plane crash. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Pamir Airways Flight 112. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pamir Airways Flight 112 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.

Sorry, but the other article is better developed and at the correct title. Mjroots (talk) 12:05, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Afghanistan plane crash

Hello, I have two choices for you. I can either history merge that into the correctly named article, which would mean that your name appears on the history but your changes don't appear in the current version or, since it's written in the present tense (which, btw, is a no-no on WP) you can take the text that you wrote and start an article on Wikinews where you can write in the present tense and not worry about notability. Let me know which you choose- if it's the first, I'll have do a lot of deleting and moving around. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the page and merged its history into Pamir Airways Flight 112. My recommendation of WN stands though- you might find things a bit easier over there. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

Have you considered archiving your talk page? One way would be to split by year. If you would like some help in creating archives in this way I will be glad to help. Mjroots (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Offshore Oregon earthquake

I have nominated 2010 Offshore Oregon earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Offshore Oregon earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mike moral ♪♫ 02:41, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinews

I think you would be interesting in writing articles for Wikinews. We can always use more contributors. Mike moral ♪♫ 04:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Same-sex marriage in Portugal

On 19 May 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Same-sex marriage in Portugal, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 01:17, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of April 2010 Solomon Islands earthquake

I have nominated April 2010 Solomon Islands earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2010 Solomon Islands earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 03:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Bering Sea earthquakes

I have nominated 2010 Bering Sea earthquakes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Bering Sea earthquakes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 03:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Southeast Taiwan earthquake

I have nominated 2010 Southeast Taiwan earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Southeast Taiwan earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Aditya Ex Machina 05:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Pamir Airways Flight 112

On 21 May 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Pamir Airways Flight 112, which you recently nominated. Twice!. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for May 2010 Central European floods

On 21 May 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article May 2010 Central European floods, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 Fuzhou train derailment

On 23 May 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Fuzhou train derailment, which you recently created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Bradjamesbrown (talk) 10:21, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Algeria earthquake

I have nominated 2010 Algeria earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Algeria earthquake (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 00:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Acre earthquake

I have nominated 2010 Acre earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Acre earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. C628 (talk) 01:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 Andaman Islands earthquake

I have nominated 2009 Andaman Islands earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Andaman Islands earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 21:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2010 Stavropol bomb blast

On June 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2010 Stavropol bomb blast, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 Kandahar wedding bombing

On 10 June 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Kandahar wedding bombing, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:44, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 Chihuahua shootings

On 12 June 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Chihuahua shootings, which you recently nominated and started. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:21, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 CASA C-212 Aviocar Cameroon crash

Great minds think alike it seems. I was working on this one under a slightly different title - 2010 Cameroon Aero Service CASA C-212 Aviocar crash - which better fits the naming conventions per WP:AVIMOS. It was only when I added the 2010 accidents template that I discovered you'd also started an article. I hope you don't mind, but I copied and pasted the text I'd created into the article you started. I intend to move the article to the title I suggested above, per naming convention. Mjroots (talk) 09:53, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 Yanga train derailment

On 21 June 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Yanga train derailment, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:33, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. –xeno^talk 19:42, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Algirdas Brazauskas

On 28 June 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Algirdas Brazauskas, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Robert Byrd

On 28 June 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Robert Byrd, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Web ns.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Web ns.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 Romanian floods

On 30 June 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Romanian floods, which you recently nominated, created and wrote, almost single-handedly, from scratch. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Web nn.png

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Web nn.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Web ns.png

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Web ns.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 South Kivu tank truck explosion

On 3 July 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 South Kivu tank truck explosion, which you recently nominated and created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN nominations

Hey, your efforts are appreciated, but they would be appreciated even more if you could provide more detail than just "Nom" in your nominations- a proposed blurb, a link to a news article and a bit of detail on why the person/even is ITN-worthy are all good things to include. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah

On 5 July 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Madalina_M.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Madalina_M.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 10:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of July 2010 Biobío earthquake

I have nominated July 2010 Biobío earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/July 2010 Biobío earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Diego Grez ^{¿qui pa'?} 03:14, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of July 2010 Biobío earthquake

A tag has been placed on July 2010 Biobío earthquake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Diego Grez ^{¿qui pa'?} 03:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suflet Gol.ogg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Suflet Gol.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 New Britain earthquake

I have nominated 2010 New Britain earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 New Britain earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Sainthia train collision

On 20 July 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Sainthia train collision, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Love Parade stampede

On 25 July 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Love Parade stampede, which you nominated and started. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:17, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 Tour de France

On 25 July 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Tour de France, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Romanian Air Force Antonov An-2 crash

I have nominated 2010 Romanian Air Force Antonov An-2 crash, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Romanian Air Force Antonov An-2 crash. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010 Nigel nursing home fire

The article 2010 Nigel nursing home fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WackyWace ^{converse | contribs} 11:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

...for the new photo of Abu Mena, and for releasing it into the public domain. It's a big improvement on the previous photo. Dppowell (talk) 21:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010 Nigel nursing home fire

The article 2010 Nigel nursing home fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS- no lasting notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:47, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Nigel nursing home fire

I have nominated 2010 Nigel nursing home fire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Nigel nursing home fire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I have saved it. :-) --can dle •wicke 03:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2010 Nigel nursing home fire

On 16 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2010 Nigel nursing home fire, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Bucharest maternity hospital explosion

I have nominated Bucharest maternity hospital explosion, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucharest maternity hospital explosion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Ecuador earthquake

I have nominated 2010 Ecuador earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Ecuador earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Diego Grez ^{what's up?} 16:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of May 2010 Vanuatu earthquake

I have nominated May 2010 Vanuatu earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May 2010 Vanuatu earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of May 2010 Vanuatu earthquake

I have nominated May 2010 Vanuatu earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May 2010 Vanuatu earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sulaimaniya hotel fire

The article Sulaimaniya hotel fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTNEWS. No lasting significance. No news since August 9.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:18, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of View of Paris from Vincent's Room in the Rue Lepic

The article View of Paris from Vincent's Room in the Rue Lepic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable and probably best left to leave on Drawings and water-colours by Vincent van Gogh.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 19 May 2010 Bucharest protests

I have nominated 19 May 2010 Bucharest protests, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/19 May 2010 Bucharest protests. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Blue Wing Airlines Antonov An-28 crash

I have nominated 2010 Blue Wing Airlines Antonov An-28 crash, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Blue Wing Airlines Antonov An-28 crash. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mile Cărpenişan

I have nominated Mile Cărpenişan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mile Cărpenişan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 Mexicali earthquake

I have nominated 2009 Mexicali earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Mexicali earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 Puebla earthquake

I have nominated 2009 Puebla earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Puebla earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 Venezuela earthquake

I have nominated 2009 Venezuela earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Venezuela earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 02:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new articles

Hi, just a note to say that you should really try to develop your articles more before posting them. Compare your creation of Filair plane crash with my creation of 2010 Little Cornard derailment. Creating well formed articles helps to avoid them being listed at AfD, as notability can be established easier. Mjroots (talk) 20:44, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And to add more, many of the articles you have written fail nobility requirements are examples of WP:NOTNEWS. That material is best reserved for inclusion on sister project, n:Wikinews. —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:10, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of AIRES Flight 8250

I have nominated AIRES Flight 8250, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIRES Flight 8250. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Nigel nursing home fire

I have nominated 2010 Nigel nursing home fire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Nigel nursing home fire (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:29, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 British Columbia avalanche

I have nominated 2010 British Columbia avalanche, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 British Columbia avalanche (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:33, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sulaimaniya hotel fire

I have nominated Sulaimaniya hotel fire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sulaimaniya hotel fire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:39, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2009 Andaman Islands earthquake

I have nominated 2009 Andaman Islands earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Andaman Islands earthquake (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work

		The Resilient Barnstar
		dont let others discourage you. keep up your good work Wikireader41 (talk) 03:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Passaredo Transportes Aéreos Flight 2231

I have nominated Passaredo Transportes Aéreos Flight 2231, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passaredo Transportes Aéreos Flight 2231. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. C628 (talk) 00:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 Damghan earthquake

A tag has been placed on 2010 Damghan earthquake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cindamuse (talk) 08:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Damghan earthquake

I have nominated 2010 Damghan earthquake, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Damghan earthquake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Diego Grez (talk) 02:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has to stop!

This is not acceptable. You must stop creating stub article with the barest of details. With earthquakes, you should be able to find significant coverage from various RSs, such as the BBC, Sky, ABC, NBC etc and be able to create an article of at least start class on the event. It's been suggested before that Wikinews might be a better venue for your editing. Please stop creating these stubs or the issue will have to be raised at WP:ANI and sanctions could then be imposed (including blocks). I don't like to see any editor blocked if it is at all avoidable. That said, I will block an editor if it is for the greater good of Wikipedia. Mjroots (talk) 09:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would add that you should consider whether an event is notable. Just look at how many AfD notices you have on this page. This is getting ridiculous. Please read WP:NOTNEWS and consider contributing these articles to Wikinews, a project specifically set up as a news site. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, so not everything that happens warrants inclusion in it, but Wikinews welcomes these kinds of articles, though, even there, you'd have to develop them. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can start you Wikinews articles in the newsroom, but be sure to look at the style guide. We at Wikinews would greatly appreciate new contributor's articles. Take note, you should finish the articles yourself, not leave a little stub. Any article left unfinished will be deleted per site policy.

All the stub news articles you write is becoming ridiculous. As per the above comments, please do take these articles to Wikinews. —Mike moral ♪♫ 20:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Progresul 3.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Progresul 3.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Mike moral ♪♫ 20:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image uploads

And all the images you have uploaded have been incorrectly uploaded. You fail to mention a source and all those images can be deleted. Are all these images yours? And if they are you should upload to the Wikimedia Commons. Commons is the central image repository for all Wikimedia projects. Unless you fix these images, I will bring them up at files for deletion. Thanks, —Mike moral ♪♫ 21:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a look at your uploads; while it may seem clear that all the pictures you have uploaded were taken by you to some, it would be very useful if you could provide some information about them- even if it's just to state what they show and that they were taken by you. This template may be useful. J Milburn (talk) 21:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Bratislava shootings

Its on the verge of a posting, just need to source up some stuff (ive tagged the necessary) and itll be ready. Plenty of support.

also try placing the links on other articles so theyre not orphans, i just added 1 link. There must be a Slovakia page to put itLihaas (talk) 03:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mada m.png

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Mada m.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 Bratislava shootings

On 1 September 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Bratislava shootings, which you recently nominated and started. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinews suggestion

If you want to write articles like this, please do it on Wikinews. Wikipedia is not for breaking news. You should wait until there is something more concrete before writing an article here. Please take this on board, I'm trying to help you. The only reason so mant of your articles are being deleted is because you're writing them in the wrong place. If you write them on Wikinews, Wikipedia's sister project specifically set up for news, then they'll be welcomed with open arms and they'll get as much prominence on Wikinews' Main Page as Today's Featured Article does on Wikipedia's. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is already on Wikinews. n:Magnitude 7.2 earthquake hits New Zealand. Just Do Not Create Articles About News! Wikipedia is not a news source, as I have told you reiterated times. Diego Grez (talk) 17:43, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eugen please ignore the rants above. I am glad you started this article which was featured in the ITN. keep up the good work.--Wikireader41 (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 New Zealand earthquake

A tag has been placed on 2010 New Zealand earthquake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Diego Grez (talk) 17:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: 2010 Canterbury earthquake

On 4 September 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Canterbury earthquake, which you created and recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 04:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: Tropical Depression Eleven-E (2010)

On 6 September 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Tropical Depression Eleven-E (2010), which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Wikireader41 (talk) 20:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article 2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Bauchi prison break

On 10 September 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Bauchi prison break, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011 Vuelta a España for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article 2011 Vuelta a España, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Vuelta a España until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Mike moral ♪♫ 19:18, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

S7 Airlines Flight 778

I am curious why you placed the photograph in the S7 Airlines Flight 778 article, indicating it was "The smoldering tail section of Flight 778." The photo you added was of a typical Airbus A319. 842U (talk) 20:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 19 September 2010 Baghdad bombings for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article 19 September 2010 Baghdad bombings, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/19 September 2010 Baghdad attacks until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Codf1977 (talk) 08:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of teams and cyclists in the 2010 Eneco Tour

Hi, on 14 August you created the deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of teams and cyclists in the 2010 Eneco Tour but provided no rationale, nor did you complete Steps 1 and 3 of the AfD process. If you still believe the article should be deleted, please provide a rationale. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2010 Vuelta a España

On 22 September 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Vuelta a España, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- Eugen Simion 14 (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Ajka alumina plant accident

On 5 October 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Ajka alumina plant accident, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View

Unless the map shows dates (and it doesn't), what you are saying makes little sense and is the violation of the WP:NOR policy. Ie. your claims, views, ideas - nobody cares, we need external and verifiable references to back up those dates. So keep distance if you don't know what means a reference.--89.110.232.235 (talk) 18:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABCD0003.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ABCD0003.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dispute solution

Talk:Google_Street_View#Dispute_solution perhaps you could join in and sort this out to get the article unlocked thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 11:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Eugen, I see you have edited but not this issue, can you either comment or state you have no more objections? We really should clear this up and get the article unlocked, wiki, the article anyone can edit is the objective. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 15:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Licha Cun.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Licha Cun.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acather96 (talk) 09:10, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged this as "own work" yet you appear to have copied it from the web. I have deleted it because we need to be sure. Please be careful not to tag things as own work unless it is actually your own work. Theresa Knott | Hasten to trek 10:00, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: October 2010 Sumatra Earthquake

On 26 October 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article October 2010 Sumatra Earthquake, which you created and recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- Eugen Simion 14 (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Paunescu.png

Thanks for uploading File:Paunescu.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 20:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Disneyland, Florida train collision listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2009 Disneyland, Florida train collision. Since you had some involvement with the 2009 Disneyland, Florida train collision redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Uncle Dick (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. You have new messages at WP:ITN/C.
Message added 16:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Replied your comment Diego Grez (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for October 2010 Baghdad church attack

On 2 November 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article October 2010 Baghdad church attack, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 23:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Cyclone Jal

On 10 November 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Cyclone Jal, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2010 Serbia earthquake for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article 2010 Serbia earthquake, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Serbia earthquake until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eucberar (talk) 11:16, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cambodia stampede in ITN

On 23 November 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Cambodia stampede, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Kslotte (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TAR results table

Per WP:ACCESS, color cannot be the only determinate to make text appear differently. The ε has been agreed upon on the talk page at Talk:The Amazing Race 17 as a perfectly fine symbol to use to symbolize the Express Pass's use.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Israel forest fire

Please help expand the article if you have time. All Israeli media has tons of reports on it, so sourcing should not be a problem. Thanks, Ynhockey ^(Talk) 21:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 December 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Mount Carmel forest fire, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Kslotte (talk) 12:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for South East Airlines Flight 372

On 9 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article South East Airlines Flight 372, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Russian Prosecutor General Yury Chaika was said to be "keeping a watchful eye" over the investigation into the crash of South East Airlines Flight 372? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Andrés Pérez

On 27 December 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Carlos Andrés Pérez, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Lihaas (talk) 16:44, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011 discussions

Nomination of 2011 Argentina earthquake for deletion

The article 2011 Argentina earthquake is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Argentina earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Diego Grez (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Tucson shooting revert

Hi,
I assume this revert was only done by mistake? If not then please review WP:ROLLBACK, and make sure that in the future you only use rollback for vandalism or similar edits where an explanatory edit summary is not necessary. Reverting content edits in contentious topics like 2011 Tucson shooting always requires an edit summary.
Thanks, Amalthea 15:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any comment? Amalthea 21:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you continue to misuse the rollback feature I have now removed your account from the "rollbacker" group. Make sure to always leave an explanatory edit summary if you undo another editors good-faithed changes. Amalthea 11:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of Tuscon shooting

Did you personally take the photos File:Tucson shoot.png and File:Tucson Shooting.png? Kelly ^hi! 16:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One of the files you uploaded is being discussed at Commons here. Please comment. Kelly ^hi! 22:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Tucson Shooting.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tucson Shooting.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Kelly ^hi! 16:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

It appears that you've uploaded files that you claimed were your own work (File:Tucson Shooting.png and File:Tucson shoot.png) that were actually stolen copyrighted works from here and here. Any explanation? Kelly ^hi! 22:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture copyright policy

Hi, you seem to be claiming ownership of pictures that you do not own. Please explain, do you understand and have you read WP:COPYRIGHT policy? Wikipedia takes copyright violations extremely seriously. Are there other pictures you have uploaded that you do not own? Please do not upload any more files until this issue is cleared up. Off2riorob (talk) 22:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: Iran Air Flight 277

On 9 January 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Iran Air Flight 277, which you created and recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 07:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Malaysia accident

Eugene, I'd caution against creating an article on this flight. I don't think that the aircraft was sufficiently damaged that it will be written off, and and AfD would probably end in a delete vote. Accident should be covered under airline, aircraft type and airport articles, which will be sufficient. Mjroots (talk) 08:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 27 January 2011 Baghdad bombing

The article 27 January 2011 Baghdad bombing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Travelbird (talk) 09:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Flight Avia Flight 7100

Hello! Your submission of Flight Avia Flight 7100 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rod ^talk 17:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Manx2 Flight 7100

On 18 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Manx2 Flight 7100, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland had planned to be aboard Manx2 Flight 7100, which crashed on landing in February 2011? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 06:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR violation and incivility on Google Street View

Why are you insisting on reverting my changes to Google Street View? Please read WP:MOSFLAG#Use of flags for non-sovereign states and nations. It states that non-sovereign flags are not appropriate. Your threats and continual revision of the article have led you to break the three-revert rule. Please justify why Wikipedia policies do not apply to your edits. Owain (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image you uploaded

Greetings, Back in 2008 you uploaded a file named File:DSC00324.JPG. Would you please tell me what that is a photo of so I can add a description and move the file to a better more descriptive file name. cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 04:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00361.JPG and File:DSC00605.JPG also needs to be identified --Guerillero | My Talk 01:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blocul Carlton.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Blocul Carlton.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[13][14]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. Note, if you did create this file, you may want to upload it to Wikimedia Commons, which will allow the image to be accessed by all Wikimedia Foundation projects (which include the various localized versions of Wikipedia)

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlton 1940.JPG is also a problem in this regard and has also been tagged. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: 2011 Yunnan earthquake

On 10 March 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2011 Yunnan earthquake, which you recently nominated and created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 20:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kretzulescu Liceum.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Kretzulescu Liceum.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 10:53, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Theres also File:DSC00361.JPG, if you don't mind :) Acather96 (talk) 10:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you once again, but if you could identify/describe File:DSC00568.JPG that would be helpful too. Thanks :), Acather96 (talk) 12:07, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2011 Jerusalem bombing

The article 2011 Jerusalem bombing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per WP:NOTNEWS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bluefist^talk 13:56, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2011 Burma Earthquake

On 26 March 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2011 Burma Earthquake, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 04:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2011 Jerusalem bus stop bombing

On 6 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2011 Jerusalem bus stop bombing, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 2011 Jerusalem bus stop bombing was a bomb attack carried out in a bus station in downtown Jerusalem which killed a 59-year-old British national? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Apology

I was way too harsh in my comment on your article and ITN nomination, and I apologize. --Golbez (talk) 16:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Rio de Janeiro school shooting

On 8 April 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Rio de Janeiro school shooting, which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

I think you wanted this. --can dle •wicke 19:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Today's quake

I would suggest working on any article in a sandbox for now. Having an article that only says "an earthquake of X strength hppened on Y" is useless. When more info is known, then it can have an article. Str Pby (talk) 09:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Fukushima earthquake

You might be right, but I think it would have been appropriate to have posted at talk first before moving the page.

There is a discussion going on about such moves and article names at Talk:2011 Miyagi earthquake.

Also, you might consider using edit summaries to help others understand your rationale. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This has nothing to do with "moves". He redirected the article, which is appropriate at the moment as the article was basically a violation of WP:NOTNEWS: a single line on the event more likely to be found in a newsflash. Str Pby (talk) 10:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2011 Minsk Metro bombing

On 12 April 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2011 Minsk Metro bombing, which you recently created, nominated, and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 13:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sol Líneas Aéreas Flight 5428

I was just about to reccomend you start taht page tll i saw on ITN you had ;)(Lihaas (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

File:DSC00891.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSC00891.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 18:08, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC010474.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC010474.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madalina M.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Madalina M.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 12:42, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Medjugorje.

Hi. I reverted your translation because it means "apparitions" not "Our Lady" which is the title of the article. --Kenatipo ^speak! 01:25, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011 - removal of maintenance template

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Google Street View, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.--Avala (talk) 15:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please be so kind to read WP:CITE and WP:SOURCE to realize what is my request all about. The second link is one of just three Core content policies of Wikipedia. It's not hard to grasp the basics of how Wikipedia works. Hint: "i saw it", "you can see it for yourself", "it's obvious" none fall under a category of a verifiable source under Wikipedia rules (also common sense rules) and none of them are a reference. Just imagine reading a scientific book, and you see a dubious claim with a number next to it, you follow the number to the footnote, only to find "this claim is a widely known fact" written next to it and that's it. No citation of a book or a person, jut a claim that it's a fact without any evidence or reference. Would you trust this book?--Avala (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:641px-Puffins-fi2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:641px-Puffins-fi2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Addi hockey 10 ^e-mail 23:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Amy Winehouse

On 23 July 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Amy Winehouse, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--RxS (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Prolog (talk) 09:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can be unblocked if and when you promise not to engage in further vandalism. Prolog (talk) 10:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have made a mistake but I expressed my frustration of one man who killed 92 people. I heard that will be punished with only 21 years. - EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 10:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Eugen Simion 14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I have made a mistake but I expressed my frustration of one man who killed 92 people. I heard that will be punished with only 21 years. One of my pen-friends from Stavanger have died in that horrible massacre

Accept reason:

Block no longer necessary. Prolog (talk) 11:18, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting comparison. You express frustration at Bleivik's likely sentence but expect your block to be reduced. WWGB (talk) 11:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Royal Moroccan Air Force Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash

Please refrain from adding speculation to developing articles. Your enthusiasm is appreciated, but all information on a developing news story should be properly cited. Ng.j (talk) 17:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page 2011 Royal Moroccan Air Force Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Ng.j (talk) 20:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011 NATO helicopter crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 NATO helicopter crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 NATO helicopter crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 09:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011 Ukraine mine accidents for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 Ukraine mine accidents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Ukraine mine accidents until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beagel (talk) 13:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1999 uefa.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:1999 uefa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Monterrey casino attack

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I made a few corrections on the article you created. I'm going to expand it, too. I had made an article of the massacre as well, but I think I'll petition for a deletion, since you made it first than I and it seems to be more complete as well. I transfered the info already.

Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience! ComputerJA (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Article length on creation

I know you like to create articles, but you often create stubs. Why not take a little more time to research the article and have it at least a start-class article when you post it? Is it a fear that someone else will beat you to creating the article that drives you to make so many short stubs? I'm not saying that the articles shouldn't be created, as in many cases they are on notable subjects. How about giving it a try the next time? Mjroots (talk) 09:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very busy right now. Wikipedia has million users that can expand the articles. The article? What article? - EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 09:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's 2011 Chilean Air Force CASA 212 crash, which I created this morning. I'm just saying that maybe you should spend just a little more time at the beginning and get a bit of structure and text in when creating articles. I'm not asking for GA quality stuff from the outset. With current event-type articles, such as you like to create, this is simply not possible. Given the right conditions, it is possible to create near-GA class articles, but that depends on sources. Mjroots (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITN credit

On 12 September 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Zanzibar ferry sinking, which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Jayron32 03:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that was okay

I increased the death toll to 65 in your nomination of 2011 Mogadishu bombing for ITN. I'm a bit tired and have belatedly realised that I should not have edited one of your posts. I apologise. Deterence ^Talk 12:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITN Credit

Great work on your nomination of the 2011 Mogadishu bombing. Cheers, m.o.p 21:04, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Your addition to File:Calanas.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Appears to be from [15] which says it's copyright to a chap called Jesus Calero. If that's you, please follow the steps at WP:IOWN to confirm this Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, you seem to have uploaded a whole raft of files copyright to someone else and claimed you are the creator. I am therefore blocking you indefinitely to stop you uploading any more. Please explain yourself if you wish to be unblocked. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree your action. When I have uploaded Panoramio photo in September 2008, I was not sure about the Panoramio Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike License and All Rights Reserved, and supposed that is not a potential infringement of copyright. I was wrong. Unfortunately, after a long time I realize that is not OK. I have checked again the rules I admitted that I have make a mistake doing this. Please unlock me, and I promise that I will not upload never a file that is not my photo. - EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 15:45, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you are fully aware of what are were doing. You received a massages about yours copyvio before[16] nevertheless you still continued to uploading stolen photos with false self-made statement and license like a file you uploaded on 26 August 2011 on commons--Oleola (talk) 20:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I recognize my faults but I think that you don t know anything about my good edits. I have 7000+ edits on Wikipedia many of them on the Wikipedia ITN articles. - EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 10:15, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eugen Simion 14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There are more than two months since I was blocked. I admit that I committed a mistake, uploading photos on my name. I regret that, but the reason I did this was to improve articles. Please unlock me, and I promise that I will not upload never a file that is not my photo. I will be an idiot if I will do it again. I need Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Why were you using this account to edit the same articles you were? This is block evasion and is not permitted. TNXMan 20:11, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eugen Simion 14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I not use Wikipedia for vandalism, spam or other stuff, this is not correct. It's the first time when I hear about sock pupetry. How long it will take this block? I'm am really sorry about that.

Decline reason:

You were been blocked for an indefinite period for uploading images which violate copyright, and the block evasion is pretty obvious. Nick-D (talk) 00:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eugen Simion 14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for more than two months, and I understand that I committed an abuse. I repeat that...I will be an idiot if I will do it again. What else should I do to be unlocked? Thanks! Happy Christmas everyone!

Decline reason:

Your understanding that you made a mistake is not countering the sock that you were just using recently. -- DQ (t) (e) 16:12, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eugen Simion 14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is there anything wrong if I used my old account? With that account I never upload a photo with copyright problems.

Decline reason:

Yes, there would be something wrong with switching to another account. It is *you* the person who is blocked, not just the account, and using another account while blocked is only compounding the problem. We need to be convinced that you understand the original problems and will not repeat them, and now also that you understand that starting new accounts to evade a block is not acceptable. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes, I read again the article about Sock puppetry and you're right. My apologize! Now you need to be convinced that I understand also this problem. In future I promise that I will be very careful, not to violate Wiki rules. All regards. - EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 14:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Eugen Simion 14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Boing! said Zebedee: Yes, I read again the article about Sock puppetry and you're right. My apologize! Now you need to be convinced that I understand also this problem. In future I promise that I will be very careful, not to violate Wiki rules. All regards.

Accept reason:

Editor with good track record, acknowledges mistakes and understands issues.

Unblocking. Please note in particular that copyright issues are not just Wikipedia rules, but laws of most countries, and can cause big problems if we are not careful about them. Rich Farmbrough, 12:39, 29 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

2012 Carterton hot air balloon crash

On 8 January 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2012 Carterton hot air balloon crash, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 08:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 1989 Alice Springs hot air balloon crash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scandinavian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Malam Bacai Sanhá

On 10 January 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Malam Bacai Sanhá, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 20:09, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New articles about hot air balloon accidents

Hello Eugen. Congratulations on your two new articles – 2012 Carterton hot air balloon crash and 1989 Alice Springs hot air balloon crash. They are excellent.

You are eligible to add both your articles to the following sites:

Keep up the good work! Dolphin (t) 07:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia

Template:WikiProject Dacia Invitation --Codrin.B (talk) 22:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 03:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Etta James

On 22 January 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Etta James, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 16:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Port Said Stadium clashes

On 2 February 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Port Said Stadium clashes, which you recently created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 10:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Competition of Google Street View, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Furth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Negros Oriental earthquake

On 8 February 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2012 Negros Oriental earthquake, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 10:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2012 Buenos Aires train crash

On 23 February 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2012 Buenos Aires train crash, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 01:48, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Szczekociny rail crash

On 6 March 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Szczekociny rail crash, which you recently created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 09:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Bucharest hair salon shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EET (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2010 Austin suicide attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2010 Austin suicide attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Austin suicide attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ysangkok (talk) 20:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for 2012 Midi-Pyrénées shootings

On 22 March 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2012 Midi-Pyrénées shootings, which you recently created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 15:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Bhoja Air Flight 213

On 20 April 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Bhoja Air Flight 213, which you recently created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 21:45, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tiago Klimeck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiago Klimeck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiago Klimeck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eurovision Song Contest 2012

Please could you revert your inclusion you just made on ESC 2012 article. There is still an on-going dispute discussion over its inclusion on the article talk page. While this discussion is talking place, we agreed to omit the details, until an outcome has been reached. Such edits which are made against a dispute discussion are classed as disruptive and in some circumstance vandalism. Thanks Wesley☀Mouse 18:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yeux099.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yeux099.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View

May I mention that your edition at Line 91 wasn't made very attentively? --Divega (talk) 14:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of Google Street View for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Google Street View is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Google Street View until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Timeline of Google Street View Source

Hi, Eugen Simion,

I noticed that you contributed to Timeline of Google Street View today with a listing of the new places introduced. What is your source for this data? This is probably the main reason the article is on track for deletion, unfortunately. I personally find that article very useful but even Google's website does not have a listing by date of when different countries or cities are introduced, and the Google Lat Long blog is not always updated.

TheAckademie (talk) 14:00, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2012 Toulouse hostage crisis

The article 2012 Toulouse hostage crisis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, not-national event, with no significance in its resolution, failing NEVENT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MASEM (t) 16:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Google Street View

Hello. I see you reverted my edits to Timeline of Google Street View. I believe it is important to have the names of countries in the article so readers can easily search for them. Let's say you want to know when Street View was first introduced in the Czech Republic, or when did it receive updates. With the article in its current form it is impossible, as there is only a flag of the country but the name is missing. I tried to make the country names as small and unobtrusive as possible. Please tell me what you think and if we can arrive to a consensus. Pristino (talk) 00:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Burgas bus bombing

On 18 July 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2012 Burgas bus bombing, which you recently created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 19:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Aurora shooting

On 20 July 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2012 Aurora shooting, which you recently created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 19:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. You have new messages at Talk:1995 Egypt earthquake.
Message added 03:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I'm interested in renaming the 1995 Egypt earthquake article and would like your input please. Dawnseeker2000 03:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have an update on this article. It's been renamed and I've expanded it with a Did You Know in mind. I have submitted it here: Template:Did you know nominations/1995 Gulf of Aqaba earthquake. If any issues come up I'll be around to fix 'em up, but I did want to let you know that I've credited you as the article's creator. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 04:28, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you moved the article

I had left an in use tag and was editing to bring the article up to speed. I will be reverting Chirag (talk) 13:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1995 Gulf of Aqaba earthquake

On 14 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1995 Gulf of Aqaba earthquake, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1995 Gulf of Aqaba earthquake apparently triggered an earthquake swarm 500 kilometers (310 mi) from its epicenter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1995 Gulf of Aqaba earthquake. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just wonder

Do you just start and nominate an article for ITN and then not try to expand the article?Egeymi (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google street view.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Google street view.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Google Street View

They're increasing coverage *and* expanding their special collections today. We don't know the details yet, but they should be available already. No need to delete the "special collections" part of the article. Pristino (talk) 09:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABCD000611.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ABCD000611.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 23:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugen Simion 14. Could you please help us identify the subject of the photo? It is unlikely to be deleted if we know what we are looking at, as then the file will be useful. Thanks. -- Dianna (talk) 00:08, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re

Sure,was a error mine,please link to me where,for see Carliitaeliza TALK 11:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View - West Bank

Hello, I was the one who made this edit, this edit, and all corresponding edits to Timeline of Google Street View adding the West Bank as a location. I'm wondering what your rationale for constantly reverting these is.

I made the edits adding the West Bank trying to keep a neutral point of view. I am not trying to instigate any sort of debate about who owns it, I'm simply putting it on the list because it does exist on Street View now. You, on the other hand, are almost trying to deny it even exists. It does, but I don't care who the West Bank belongs to; it is a disputed territory so I put it down separately. Even when I posted it without the Palestinian flag, you continued to remove any mention of the West Bank denying that it has Street View as well - if you go to Google Maps here and drag the Street View icon over the map, you'll notice that the eastern part of Jerusalem and the whole eastern road through the West Bank have Street View coverage.

Judging by the similar aggressive remarks, I'm assuming this was you, right? Claiming that the West Bank doesn't exist pretty much makes you a hypocrite by pushing your own political agenda. The derogatory remarks in the edit summaries are not necessary, either, and further cement the fact that you are probably using your own bias in this article.

I'll re-add West Bank to the articles without any reference to Palestine. If you want to take it down, please continue to discuss this with me here first before removing it or I'll put in a WP:3RR report. Thanks. 178.84.224.2 (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

West Bank

I would still like to include it. Google added areas in the West Bank, regardless of what they list it as or what is planned. Thank you. Monocletophat123 (talk) 07:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC) The fact of the matter is Google itself is unclear on the topic, so I think a map is as good a reference as any. According to this article, "Asked whether Street View would be photographing streets in Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, Solomon refused to comment. Nor would he say whether Street View was planning to launch the service in the Palestinian territories." Google is not saying if it is Israel or Palestine. But seriously, just look at the map. The territory is in West Bank.[reply]

Nomination of Carpatair Flight 1670 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carpatair Flight 1670 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carpatair Flight 1670 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ...William 13:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article doesn't stand a good chance of surviving AFD. Even a hull loss, and there's now way of knowing it will be that at this point in time, guarantees an independent article just a mention in type of airplane, airport, etc articles. Here's an offer- I'll make it into a redirect to the Airport article. Your work will be preserved, unlike if its deleted and your work will be erased. Let me know by replying here or at the AFD....William 14:05, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve South Airlines Flight 8971

Hi, I'm Beach drifter. Eugen Simion 14, thanks for creating South Airlines Flight 8971!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. See Wikipedia:Notability_(events) for information about what is generally considered an event that merits an article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Non-free file File:Lisboa2005.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lisboa2005.jpg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:Lisboa2005.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 14:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file File:Eindhoven2006.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Eindhoven2006.jpg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:Eindhoven2006.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 15:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file File:Glasgow 2007.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Glasgow 2007.jpg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:Glasgow 2007.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 14:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View

You added Bulgaria as being on Google Street View and it is not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BC3A:1610:44CC:74:218D:A4D (talk) 22:36, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. You have new messages at Kashmiri's talk page.
Message added 16:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

kashmiri 16:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View

Now you see how wrong your edits were. The Bulgaria Street View went live today 6 March but because of your stubbornness Wikipedia featured an incorrect information for a couple of hours. That's precisely why Wikipedia community decided long ago that product announcements are not allowed here until the very moment the product is put to the market. You had been told about this before, anyway. What's more, in reverting my reverts you violated WP:BRD and the WP:3RR and could have been reported to admin noticeboard for such attitude. Next time please do not act this way. Ah, and by the way avoid bare URLs as references and double-check the links you post so that others don't have to correct them. kashmiri 20:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Street View in Poand

Hi. Do you know, when SV will be available in all places in Poland? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trancefan1986 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by User:Delyan

Hi, I just reverted edits to your Talk page by User:Delyan as they were extremely offensive not only towards you but towards an ethnic group. Hope you don't mind. Regards, kashmiri 02:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Velika Ivanča shooting

On 9 April 2013, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Velika Ivanča shooting, which you recently created and nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 17:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ITN notice

On 16 April 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2013 Sistan and Baluchestan earthquake, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Purple flower 2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Purple flower 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mayday

Stop doing that! I am so angry at you Qantasplanes (talk) 07:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Asiana Airlines Flight 214

On 6 July 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Asiana Airlines Flight 214, which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

v/r - T P 20:39, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Google Street View

Hi Eugen. I can see you added the Wieliczka Salt Mine but there is NO street view, only a 360° picture (+ many panoramios). I missed something? Blump007 (talk) 05:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. Yesterday there was no orange spot but today they're available, yeah! Blump007 (talk) 20:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UPS Airlines Flight 1354 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UPS Airlines Flight 1354 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPS Airlines Flight 1354 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LGA _talk^edits 08:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dans la jardin.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dans la jardin.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:38, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2009 French riots for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2009 French riots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 French riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BDD (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mihai Fotino

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mihai Fotino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted

material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.   Kolbasz (talk) 15:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pegasus Airlines Flight 751 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pegasus Airlines Flight 751 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pegasus Airlines Flight 751 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William 20:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Competition of Google Street View

Regarding WoNoBo, India's local street view service. Patna and Amritsar were added to the website at around 1100, 17 February 2014 (UTC).But at this moment it look like both have been removed. Probably when you visted the website,Patna was present but Amritsar was gone by that time. I am presently not sure how WoNoBo is going to press on it. But I just wanted to clarify there was no attempt of spam. ( shabbygame 19:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: At 20:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC). At homepage of WoNoBo. Amritsar & Patna are not visble. But Direct Link (http://www.wonobo.com/patna & http://www.wonobo.com/amritsar) are still active. (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View flag discussion

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. You have new messages at Talk:Google Street View.
Message added 04:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ProtossPylon 04:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ProtossPylon 01:42, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to May 2014 Ürümqi attack may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:Urumqi Gongyuan Beijie 2014 05 23.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Gongyuan Street (the location of the attack]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ITN nomination

Why did you just remove my ITN nomination for the abdication of Juan Carlos? There's no need to put it back - Tone's version is up there now - but I can't see any reason for you to have removed mine. Thanks. AlexTiefling (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updating Timeline of Google Street View

Hi Eugen! Since I've seen that you always prepare the edits of that article a few days or a day earlier the update is made, I wanted to ask you: How do you know when it's going to be an update and which country it will be? Where to look?

Thanks!

--Fedejr712 (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Air Algérie Flight 5017

On 24 July 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Air Algérie Flight 5017, which you recently nominated and created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 22:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2014 SOCATA TBM crash

The article 2014 SOCATA TBM crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tragic but WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 22:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014 SOCATA TBM crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 SOCATA TBM crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 SOCATA TBM crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William 23:56, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you wish to have any input into what happens to that section please comment on Talk:Google_Street_View#Coverage_section:_is_it_up-to-date.3F_Is_it_even_maintainable.3F. --Cornellier (talk) 12:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Landmarks in Egypt in Google Street View

Your [revision] adds the phrase "Landmarks in Egypt" In the section "Stable release". That's why I undid it. Maybe you're not seeing that? It even has a flag. Or is that in some way appropriate? --Cornellier (talk) 20:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 2015

A tag has been placed on Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 2015 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Mozambique beer poisonings

You noted on ITN that the death toll had reached 72. If you can link to the source either here, at the ITN nom, or the article itself (project or talk page) that would be helpful. Thanks. μηδείς (talk) 18:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]