Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 47.201.190.53 (talk) at 14:35, 8 September 2018 (→Michael Mamas). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts
    "WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases
    float
    float
    float
    float
    Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion

    Maradex Cove

    This page is a draft that is awaiting review to become published, please restore there's no back up for the hardwork done on this article. Thank you —Davis Lewis (talk) 06:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Hi Davis Lewis, it looks like the draft was never submitted for review - I'm willing to restore it, but this draft will need a lot of work before it's ready to be accepted. The page is fairly promotional in tone and has no coverage from independent, reliable sources that could establish notability, as the sourcing is almost entirely taken from the company's website or social media sites or places that wouldn't be seen as notability-giving on Wikipedia. The promotional tones are also a big issue, as things like "making it a good source for advertisement and commercials" are very, very promotional and would need to be completely removed from the article. As it stands, much of the draft would need to be either removed or re-written so I want to make sure that you're aware of the further work that needs to be done before restoring. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello ReaderofthePack, Yes all that will be removed and reconstructed, thanks for pointing them out.

    Draft:Wayne Dupree

    Article went through AfD in Feb 2017 and was deleted. Since then Dupree has received more coverage, A Washington Post article Feb 2018 is now the first reference in the lede has been added to the article that wasn't there in 2017. Also added a Feb 2018 Slate magazine article as reference two, and a link to his appearance on Fox News as a Political commentator in Feb 2018. Please restore for inclusion into WP. Thanks. —18:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Cllgbksr (talk)

    If you review the draft article talk page you will see another editor was about to approve it for BLP on 082818, after I submitted it for review again, but then apparently saw it had been deleted in AfD Feb 2017, and is now requesting I submit it through this process. If I'm reading his notes correctly. Cllgbksr (talk) 19:08, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Cllgbksr: I won't be reviewing this myself as I'm involved, but could you please email me a copy of the Washington Post article so that I can have a read of it? Thanks SmartSE (talk) 19:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Smartse: If you click on the draft of the article, it is reference number one for the lede. But will email it. Thanks. Cllgbksr (talk) 19:29, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Cllgbksr: Yep but it's paywalled. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 19:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Smartse: I just emailed it. Thanks Cllgbksr (talk) 19:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    No response yet to my request on Dupree draft, will wait until September 7, 2018, after that if still no response will move draft into mainstream, will deal with any AFD nominations should they occur at a later date. Thanks. Cllgbksr (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    You mean "mainspace". —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Correct. Cllgbksr (talk) 15:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Ephomz2.jpg and File:Ephomz6.jpg

    The files transfered to Commons but have been delated there. —Electron (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • They were both deleted on Commons because they were taken in a country which doesn't allow Freedom of Panorama. Does that not restrict them from being uploaded here as well? Hut 8.5 18:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    On Commons yes (they are not allow), on en-wikipedia not (they are allow), eg. see: {{FoP-USonly}} or Category:Wikipedia images using freedom of panorama. Electron (talk) 11:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Crossroads Academy (Lyme, NH)

    article was left untended and will be updated for resubmission —Morninggate (talk) 02:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    When it was undeleted, it was deleted almost 6 months to the day later. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Madame Élisabeth de France (1764–1794) (Adélaïde Labille-Guiard)

    I, Henryshirley, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Henryshirley (talk) 18:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rainier Avenue

    I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? The last time it got undeleted, it was deleted almost exactly six months later. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    deputy crown prince

    —2001:16A2:A47:6900:64F9:BE76:319D:44DB (talk) 01:04, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Hero of Labour (North Korea)

    I, Finnusertop, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:50, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tsawwassen_-_Family_at_Beach.jpg

    This is a Creative Commons image, Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version ... —24.207.52.9 (talk) 23:10, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    user:Sunnytsawwassen who uploaded it said this: "image uploaded in error - not free use". This user also mentioned "Property of the Tsawwassen Business Improvement Assocation". So really there should be an WP:OTRS email from the Tsawwassen Business Improvement Assocation to confirm this free license rather than a statement from an IP address that we cannot link with the picture. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:16, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Graeme Bartlett I am that user user:Sunnytsawwassen, and we are the Tsawwassen Business Improvement Association. We are the (intellectual property rights) owners of this image and do not want it to be in the Creative Commons and therefore shared as though it were a stock photo. It was never intended to be shared there and as such were are correcting any error/misunderstaning made through it having been uploaded. Please inform me about in which manner I can send that email and to whom and I will do so. —Preceding undated comment added 07:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
    If you do not intend the photo to be shared then do not use a creative commons license. Most images here should be under free use, for any one to copy and use. There is some WP:Fair use happening here, but the photo mentioned above could be easily replaced by a free use one, so fair use could not be claimed. Read Wikipedia:Contact us - Licensing to see the email address, if you did intend to official prove that you represent Tsawwassen Business Improvement Assocation and can upload content and license on their behalf. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:08, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bjørn Lynne

    I, Lantrix, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lantrix //Talk//Contrib// 10:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Higher Self Yoga

    Never finished it. Have new text and can update. —Agnilady (talk) 22:35, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Jannquell_Peters_(politician)

    I would like to view the copy because I no longer have access to the computer it was drafted on. I would like to continue to add to the article for a future submission. The page is in my name Jannquell Peters—Jancpet (talk) 00:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jannquell Peters, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user DGG (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. You may be able to get this converted to a draft. But please read WP:Autobiography to see if you want to do this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    {U|Pancpet}}, I closed as "delete" on the basis of unanimous consensus at a full discussion. I could not possibly have closed otherwise, and I think on the basis of experience that this is what you will be told as Deletion Review. Looking again at the material, if you want to try a new article, I do not see the point of trying to make an article until you have substantially better references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, that report significant accomplishments, not trivia, and until you learn to in an NPOV manner. As Graeme has indicated, the barrier of acceptance for autobiographies is quite high, because of the obvious difficulty of writing objectively about oneself. DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carlos Trupp Wanner

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Juancarlostrupp (talk) 04:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Intershop Markup Language

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Wikidisk (talk) 10:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC) I see a tag for "isml" active within an HTML web document. To me, it seems obvious that "ISML" is still being supported within web browsers, and so it should still be included in Wikipedia as an active article.[reply]

    Draft:Supergirl (season 2)

    I intend to see this draft be greatly developed before being brought to the mainspace. I thought its creator would do something, but since he didn't, I guess I'll do it myself. —Kailash29792 (talk) 11:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Hugo_Uys

    I, 2604:2000:1404:8243:883D:EFD1:759A:107C, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2604:2000:1404:8243:883D:EFD1:759A:107C (talk) 15:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    A.S.D. Romagna Centro Cesena and A.C. Cesena

    Request to restore the old content of namespace A.S.D. Romagna Centro Cesena (prior 2 September move) and move back the new content of "A.S.D. Romagna Centro Cesena" back to namespace A.C. Cesena. An Admin that not participated in WP:Footy discussion board for a long time made a controversial merge. Matthew_hk tc 05:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    The old content A.S.D. Romagna Centro Cesena was deleted under G6 but in fact not eligblie (as least made a three-way move to make a placeholder for the content of so called "A.S.D. Romagna Centro Cesena" re-foundation as a successor of "A.C. Cesena" in 2018. Matthew_hk tc 04:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I think you'd be better off opening a discussion about the move. Hut 8.5 20:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    ESRA rating files

    The files are PD. Please unhide the hidden file revisions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:FC Esperia Viareggio logo.png

    NFC removed by new user from the article. It is essential logo for F.C. Esperia Viareggio which is currently under S.S.D. Viareggio 2014 article title. —Matthew_hk tc 06:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Talley Mountain

    WP:REFUND Abyssal (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC) —Abyssal (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Joseph K. Taussig Jr.

    I realize that this is a special case, because the article was deleted as G5, by a sockpuppet. However, Draft:Joseph K. Taussig Jr. is in draft space and being worked, and the two pages have somewhat different content, and a good-faith editor should be able to consolidate them. If this isn't permitted because the rules are the rules, please advise as to whether there is some other way to get the deleted article, such as DRV, but I don't think that the deletion was in error, only that the subject of the article may be notable. Sending the article to me via email is okay with me if it is okay with you. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC) —Robert McClenon (talk) 22:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC) Both versions of the biography were created by sockpuppets. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Joel Snyder

    I, Aparker42, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aparker42 (talk) 23:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Aparker42: it is deleted under G5 instead of abandoned draft. Matthew_hk tc 04:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Java Champions

    The original page was awful and correctly flagged for deletion. It was then re-written to be factual and useful. It was also providing external references. The page wasn't perfect but a decent first version. However, I think I failed to comment in the discussion after the re-writing. So, I think the page was deleted without being re-read. Java Champions are an important group in the Java community and the computer engineering world in general. Anyone using the Internet is using something written by them. Generally as open-source software. Can you please consider undeleting the page? —Henritremblay (talk) 03:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    It isn't eligible for restoration due to being deleted as a result of a deletion discussion; however, I can restore it to draft space if you commit to improving it and submitting it for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:OneCevenol/sandbox

    (talk) 04:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Hesam Bani-Eghbal

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Hesam Bani-Eghbal 07:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ronald J. Hruska Jr.

    I, Jen.Gloystein, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jen.Gloystein (talk) 21:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Jen.Gloystein: You may continue working on the draft. —C.Fred (talk) 01:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Vvvv

    This is certainly a notable topic, with books written on the topic in chinese, japanese, german and english, an annual conference, and so on. —Yaxu (talk) 22:36, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. —C.Fred (talk) 00:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Y La Bamba (Band)

    I would like to finish this Article. I believe that it received too much criticism in its approval process. This is a noteworthy band that has received a lot of press. I don't understand why it was so difficult to get it approved. Also, I don't have a lot of time to spend editing and submitting. But, I feel that it would be a big waste of time and effort if this page is not approved. The band been written about in the New York times and on NPR and has much more noteworthy press than many bands that have been approved on wikipedia for just a basic page that lists their existence. I don't even really like this band at all. They are very prominent in the Portland, OR music scene though and I thought it was ridiculous that they haven't been recognized yet for a wikipedia page. Anyway, sorry! I don't mean to cause any turmoil. I just think it is really frustrating to try to create an article for submission and then it gets deleted. Granted it has been months since I first submitted it. But, I would've hoped someone else would've taken it upon themselves to help see it through to being accepted. Thank you for your time and effort! —Yesterdaysfire (talk) 23:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
    There was also a page deleted in 2011 under the title Y La Bamba. I don't think we need to history merge. —C.Fred (talk) 01:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:29 kilometer

    it was deleted with no reason and without my permission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anne Kadushina (talk • contribs) 00:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done The article was deleted per criterion G7 for speedy deletion, but on review, the original editor didn't tag the page. I've restored it and removed the {{db-author}} template. —C.Fred (talk) 00:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Yves Amu Klein

    I, GamaArts, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GamaArts (talk) 09:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Robert Cruickshank

    I, NitaGale1968, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NitaGale1968 (talk) 11:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Azmi Haq

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Shah.azeem.naqvi (talk) 12:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi,

    I request that Azmi haq (page name) be undeleted based on the fact that he is a prominent Pakistani actor and political figure. You can also checked the notability guidelines for people and he meets that criteria based on the cult following his television dramas have in Pakistan and the fact that he is often taped by media for political commentary.

    Please feel free to revert on my email ((Redacted)) or here if you require any further information.

    Regards,

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. I have also redacted your email address; do not post publicly-identifying information like that on highly-trafficked pages like this. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:Xinjiang_reeducation_camps/Temp2

    Not sure why it was speedy deleted with the reason of G8. the page is a subpage of an existing page Talk:Xinjiang_reeducation_camps although I haven't linked the subpage from parent page yet by the time of the deletion. —C933103 (talk) 15:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:153rd_Field_Artillery_Group

    I, 128.230.232.119, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 128.230.232.119 (talk) 15:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:October 2018 album cover.jpg

    Please refund this file page. It was deleted because the article it was used on was in the draftspace but now the article is shining bright in the mainspace as October (soundtrack). Please also rename this file page as "October (soundtrack cover).jpg" without creating a redirect. —Harsh Rathod Poke me! 22:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – As a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for the support! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 06:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Peter Earl

    I would like to address the reasons why the old page was deleted (which I'm sure were valid), and improve the page if possible. I am otherwise half way through a draft of a new page - starting from scratch. I think there may be enough information for the page to be interesting. Thank you! —Rich6500 (talk) 11:31, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Zhejiang

    I, Rich6500, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    I, Rich6500, did not request this at all! Rich6500 (talk) 14:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ceratopsian habitat

    I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
    @Abyssal: Please work on the prose quickly, as there are maintenance tags for close paraphrasing. —C.Fred (talk) 21:39, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Grimey's

    I, Rich6500 El1976, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. - Erin Lux 15:21, 6 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by El1976 (talk • contribs)

    Name of requesting user corrected. —C.Fred (talk) 21:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I, Rich6500, am confused why people keep putting my name on things! Rich6500 (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rich6500: Looks like people are copying the output and not using the template. —C.Fred (talk) 21:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done Article was deleted in 2009 at the request of its creator, and the contents are a mere sentence.
    @El1976: It's probably easier to start from scratch. —C.Fred (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Formulae (software)

    I, Cllgbksr Lugalde, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lugalde (talk) 17:37, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


    To keep working on it, in order to be accepted as article —Lugalde (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. —C.Fred (talk) 21:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Twilight Bark Newsletter

    I, 2600:1700:CB81:13B0:9985:97E9:9532:874A, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2600:1700:CB81:13B0:9985:97E9:9532:874A (talk) 05:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Gymshark

    I, Noxxx1023, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Noxxx1023 (talk) 09:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Horiyasu_彫やす

    After deleting the page, I was asked by the person who I was writing it about to not delete the page —Martenpharez (talk) 09:30, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lie's formula ‎

    G13 (for one thing, it’s not applicable as it is a MfD survivor.) —Taku (talk) 10:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Example

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Luigiajah (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


    Draft:K-groups of a field

    G13 —Taku (talk) 13:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Andrei Ripianu

    G13 —Taku (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jonathan Block

    G13 —Taku (talk) 13:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Illya Hicks

    G13 —Taku (talk) 13:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:VisualLab

    G13 (not sure about the notability and the access to the content is helpful in determining the notability) —Taku (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Andre Braddy

    G13 (I don’t know about the notability) —Taku (talk) 13:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Formulae (software)

    I, Lugalde, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lugalde (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


    Draft:Formulae (software)

    Please undelete this page, I wish to to update it and to add references in order to be acepted as article —Lugalde (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Intellectual yet idiot

    I, Vergilden, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VergilDen (talk) 20:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


    User:Angrytoast/"Seattle Camera Club"

    Not a test page, I intend to move this page to draftspace. —PrussianOwl (talk) 20:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Wheat production in Tanzania

    I, PrussianOwl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PrussianOwl (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:F-TYPE SVR and other talk pages created by 125.36.186.108

    There are three things in common with these four talk pages. First, they were all created by 125.36.186.108. Second, they were all deleted as CSD G8. Finally, looking at the deleted creations, the sizes indicate that they were most likely drafts misplaced in the talk namespace. They should therefore be restored and moved to Draft:F-TYPE SVR, Draft:Nicole Hunter, Draft:Malcolm Tedworth, and Draft:Rak (James Goode) respectively. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    michael mamas

    {{subst:refund|1= Michael Mamas |2= Michael Mamas is a well published author of numerous books. So please restore his Wikipedia article. I was surprised to not see it anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.201.190.53 (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Michael Mamas

    Michael Mamas is a well published author of numerous books, and writes for the Huffington Post. So please restore his Wikipedia article. I was surprised to not see it anymore. —47.201.190.53 (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=858624860"