Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Jurovich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KCVelaga (talk) 00:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Jurovich

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCOLLATH or WP:NGRIDIRON, because he does not have any national awards or national media coverage beyond what would be WP:ROUTINE for the average college football player or undrafted NFL free agent. He has never seen any regular season/postseason game action as an NFL player. Arbor to SJ (talk) 05:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable per nom.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: I have added three San Jose Mercury News stories about Jurovich that I think should make the article meet WP:GNG, because those articles are non-trivial profiles centered around him as an individual. I request to withdraw my nomination in the light of this new info. Arbor to SJ (talk) 05:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Despite the nominator's withdrawal, since an outstanding delete !vote exists, this could not be closed with a speedy keep result, hence the relisting. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per nominator's withdrawal and sources added to meet WP:GNG. Yetisyny (talk) 06:47, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Mercury News sources and the ESPN source are sufficient to satisfy WP:GNG. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.