Jump to content

Talk:National Lottery (United Kingdom)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 15:47, 13 September 2018 (Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:National Lottery (United Kingdom)/Archives/2015. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Name of Article

Shouldn't this article be called "National Lottery (United Kingdom and Isle of Man)" instead of "National Lottery (United Kingdom)" since it also takes place in the Isle of Man, but the Isle of Man is not part of United Kingdom? Ezza1995 (talk) 22:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems it has now been reverted to the latter. Do we not normally open RfCs for this type, of thing? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Table info is correct (new lotto formula)

my sales figure is correct = the prizes are correct

sat 10/10/15 sales "reverse-calculated" (see table) = 35,609,006£

formula:

sales X prize fund (17.82%) X prize pool% / number of winners =

cat1 prize: 35609006 X 17.82% X 83.2% = 5279477 (jackpot)

cat2 prize: 35609006 X 17.82% X 1.9% / 1 = 120564 (prize 5+bn)

cat3 prize: 35609006 X 17.82% X 2% / 61 = 2080 (prize 5)

cat4 prize: 35609006 X 17.82% X 12.9% / 5059 = 161 (prize 4)

Geertes62 (talk) 07:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)geertes62[reply]

It was better to do it directly on the sales!

if you take 17.82% of the sales and then 83.2% of that part you become of course 14.83% on the sales!

(100 X 17.82%) X 83.2% = 14.83

so the pool's % on sales are (theoretical!):

cat1= 14.83% sales + cat2= 0.34% sales + cat3= 0.36% sales + cat4= 2.30% sales + cat5= 13.00% sales + cat6= 9.75 sales + raffle's pool 6.93% = total 47.5% sales

even better: the avg prizes of cat2 to cat4: you can make them fixed prizes!!!! (the 50,000 & 1,000 & 100 £)

Geertes62 (talk) 12:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)geertes62[reply]

national lottery.

Why do not sack some bosses of Camelot - for ruining a working class chance to get moderately rich fun activity - now it's just a clever con to up Camelot bonuses! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.87.10 (talk) 10:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on National Lottery (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Jackpot Problem (Lotto)

As in 2016, the National Lottery has decided to make the jackpot limit from 50 million to around 22 million, but in this case, isn't making this lotto pointless when it has rollover then cascaded to someone else who won the lower tier, and then it has to be all over again? for an instance that 59C6 (the probability to win the jackpot in lotto) = 45,057,474 , however you get up to 12 million times what you have bet when you won a jackpot. this case is seemingly killing their business, and this matter is decreasing the popularity of the National Lottery Lotto. do you agree?


202.40.211.144 (talk) 10:01, 24 February 2018 (UTC)lottery248[reply]

New Lotto (again) 21nov18

If (I say IF) the payout = 47.50% of sales the new lotto looks like this....chart

2£ per ticket & 6/59 matrix = no chance

chart is full draw of all 45057474 combinations

sales= 45057474 times 2= £90114948

2 correct = a free ticket 2£ enrty


max 6 draw = if no jackpot winner in 6th draw = jackpot must be won in that 6th draw

if that happens jackpot will be go to all winners cat 5+bonus to 3 winners

NO RAFFLE!!


cat winners odds 1 to prize pool % sales avg. prize per winner £
6 1 45057474 17.23% 15524448
5+bonus 6 7509579 1.11% 166667
5 312 144415 0.61% 1750
4 20670 2180 3.21% 140
3 468520 96 15.60% 30
2 4392375 10 9.75% 2
Total 4881884 9 47.50% 9

It's sad they should have taken the 1st version
6/49, 1£, that was: 237 jackpot winners a year of 2.1 million £ each !!!! geertes62 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geertes62 (talk • contribs) 09:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:National_Lottery_(United_Kingdom)&oldid=859366336"