Jump to content

User talk:Erik ginters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by TheGreatWikiLord (talk | contribs) at 13:26, 24 September 2018 (General note: Censorship of material on Nurse practitioner. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Erik ginters, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Nurse practitioner does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

I am not clear on what about my contribution is not in compliance with the neutrality requirement? I have described a profession of which I am part of and have earned a doctoral degree in. The use of the term "mid-level" to describe a nurse practitioner is not only antiquated, but offensive. It has no place in this Wikipedia page and should be removed.

Please help me with...

My wikipedia contribution for nurse practitioner is as follows:

A nurse practitioner is an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) trained to assess patient needs, order and interpret diagnostic and laboratory tests, diagnose illness and disease, prescribe medication and formulate treatment plans. According to the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, a nurse practitioner is educated at the masters or doctoral level to provide "primary, acute, chronic, and specialty care to patients of all ages and all walks of life". They are instrumental in the coordination of patient care, provide patients and families with health education, and are present in every health care setting. Since 2002, nurses have been ranked as the most trusted profession according to the Gallup Poll.

Erik ginters (talk) 04:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By reverting to your preferred version of the statement, without engaging in a discussion on the talk page of the Nurse practitioner article (Talk:Nurse practitioner) you have taken the first step of an edit war. Talk to your fellow editors on that page to figure out if the concerns you have about the current language can be addressed without raising countervailing concerns with other editors. If you read through past discussions on that page, you should see that some of the wording that concerns you has been hammered on before, so changing it should not be done without establishing, as best you can, a consensus for the change. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 04:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are admitting bias by saying "a profession of which I am part of and have earned a doctoral degree in." Mid-level_practitioner has a whole article in Wikipedia. Just because you consider it offensive is not grounds for removal. Please talk on the Talk:Nurse practitioner and reach consensus before removing well sourced information. Also given that you already have bias, I would recommend that if you can not maintain an WP:NPOV please refrain from editing this article. So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 16:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I understand you find the termMid-level practitioner offensive, but on wikipedia we cannot omit information because someone finds it offensive. Omitting this information will maker our readers less informed. You also cannot add WP:UNDUE weight on information like gallup poll, please also read what Wikipedia is not. I have tried to talk and reach a WP:Consensus you do not seem to be interested. Even Jim McG tried to guide you, PLEASE read the links we have given provided for you. So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TheGreatWikiLord. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Nurse practitioner. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not remove the term Mid-level practitioner, please see Talk:Nurse_practitioner#Midlevel and Talk:Nurse_practitioner#Lede for wp:consensus So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 13:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]