Talk:At 89
Albums Stub‑class | |||||||
|
Sources
- http://pitchfork.com/features/interviews/7543-pete-seeger/
- http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/nyregion/westchester/04seegerwe.html
- http://www.umc.org/site/c.lwL4KnN1LtH/b.4888903/k.4A2C/Music_Review_Pete_Seeger_emAt_89em.htm
- http://www.metacritic.com/music/at-89
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/dec/07/pete-seeger-at-89-review
- http://articles.sfgate.com/2008-09-28/entertainment/17158725_1_pete-seeger-children-s-choirs-masterpiece
Feel free to add more! --Another Believer (Talk) 01:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Making corrections/additions
I seem to recall this article being a bit longer. It might be that some factual information was deleted (erroneously?) because of inadequate citations. I have joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums in hopes of setting this and other entries to rights. For the record "At 89" was Pete Seeger's 2nd Grammy-winning album, the first being the 1996 release "Pete" which was recorded by Paul Winter.
I make no secret of the fact I am the engineer of record on this project. I have firsthand knowledge of facts that do not appear in the public record, but I will be judicious here, to cite only what is plainly verifiable, and citing references everywhere as appropriate. I do not want my editing to be summarily reverted, because someone favors procedure over facts. But I will respond to any comments left on this Talk page.
If I state that the album features a blend of instrumental and vocal songs, interspersed with poignant spoken word segments, I will not expect a citation of a tertiary source is needed. But I will include and cite some of the reviews that still remain online in my re-writes, and I will correct the broken link to the review at AllMusic, upon which the current article is apparently largely based.
Regards,
Jonathan JonathanD (talk) 21:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)