Jump to content

Talk:At 89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JonathanD (talk | contribs) at 21:07, 25 September 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAlbums Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Sources

Feel free to add more! --Another Believer (Talk) 01:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Making corrections/additions

I seem to recall this article being a bit longer. It might be that some factual information was deleted (erroneously?) because of inadequate citations. I have joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums in hopes of setting this and other entries to rights. For the record "At 89" was Pete Seeger's 2nd Grammy-winning album, the first being the 1996 release "Pete" which was recorded by Paul Winter.

I make no secret of the fact I am the engineer of record on this project. I have firsthand knowledge of facts that do not appear in the public record, but I will be judicious here, to cite only what is plainly verifiable, and citing references everywhere as appropriate. I do not want my editing to be summarily reverted, because someone favors procedure over facts. But I will respond to any comments left on this Talk page.

If I state that the album features a blend of instrumental and vocal songs, interspersed with poignant spoken word segments, I will not expect a citation of a tertiary source is needed. But I will include and cite some of the reviews that still remain online in my re-writes, and I will correct the broken link to the review at AllMusic, upon which the current article is apparently largely based.

Regards,

Jonathan JonathanD (talk) 21:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]