Jump to content

Talk:FreeRTOS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ConradPino (talk | contribs) at 05:50, 23 October 2018 (FreeRTOS Security Flaws Reported: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

".org" should be removed from the name

I think the ".org" should be removed from the name "FreeRTOS.org". The name of the operating system is FreeRTOS, the internet domain is FreeRTOS.org. Look at their website [1] to see that they call it "FreeRTOS" themself. 86.84.145.232 12:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any SSL port for Free RTOS

Hi

  I would like to know that is there any SSL port available for FreeRTOS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.147.22 (talk) 06:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] 

I think that maybe you should try asking the FreeRTOS team, rather than the internet in general, and wikipedians specifically. Jimadilo (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coldfire Support

So... it says "Supported OSes" and lists Coldfire. But beside Coldfire is a parenthesized "not supported". So, which is it? Is it no longer supported? Was it ever supported? -Fuzzy (talk) 20:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Assembler Functions"

The language is called "assembly". The program which translates it to binary is an "assembler". 24.1.252.60 (talk) 11:24, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OpenRTOS

Do we really need a complete sales pitch for this operating system? According to the SafeRTOS website itself:

"However, SAFERTOS is not FreeRTOS. It has been completely redesigned by our team of safety experts. Our engineers took the FreeRTOS functional model..."

This should be moved to it's own page, which is linked to from the FreeRTOS page, and the very obvious bias should be corrected . I may do some of this myself if I find the time. Jimadilo (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Modified GPL to allow commercial use

GPL donesn't forbid commercial use, so this sentence should be rephrased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.150.224.69 (talk) 10:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on FreeRTOS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SafeRTOS in ROM?

The article says "SafeRTOS is included in the ROM of some Stellaris Microcontrollers from Texas Instruments", a claim that is also found here:[2]

Looking at section 1.3.2 of the TI Stellaris LM3S9B96 Microcontroller datsheet[3] this chip has SafeRTOS in ROM,

But according to Digikey[4] and Mouser[5] it is an obsolete item, no longer available.

So is there a currently available chip with SafeRTOS in ROM, or should I edit the page to say "SafeRTOS was included in the ROM of some now-obsolete Stellaris Microcontrollers from Texas Instruments"? --Guy Macon (talk) 15:20, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guy, you might want to ask an official at the company that supports SafeRTOS to clarify it. Numerous unique chips from Asia are never sold by Mouser or Digikey. There are so darn many chips in this world, it's hard to know if something doesn't exist, thus sometimes better to ask an official source. • SbmeirowTalk22:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FreeRTOS Security Flaws Reported

  • Nichols, Shaun (October 22, 2018). "Patch me, if you can: Grave TCP/IP flaws in FreeRTOS leave IoT gear open to mass hijacking". The Register.

Conrad T. Pino (talk) 05:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]