Jump to content

Brand intimacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Allisev23 (talk | contribs) at 22:00, 31 October 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Brand intimacy is defined as the level of emotional connection a brand has with its customers.[1] The theory specifically focuses on a customer’s emotional relationship with a brand, positing that customers who have strong brand intimacy with a given brand have a powerful, positive emotional connection with that brand.

Brand intimacy model

Brand intimacy is centered around the theory that in order for a brand to succeed, it must appeal and connect with a customer’s emotions in a deep and meaningful way.[1] [2] The model defines six characteristics commonly found in brands that have an emotionally intimate relationship with its customers. These are called archetypes and include: Fulfillment, Identity, Enhancement, Ritual, Nostalgia and Indulgence.[3]

The model also measures the strength of the bonds between brand and customer. This is defined in a series of stages of increasing emotional connection or intimacy between customer and brand. These stages of increasing Brand Intimacy are: sharing, bonding and fusing. [4] The model quantifies the intimacy between customer and brand through a Brand Intimacy Quotient.[5]

References

  1. ^ a b "Building Brand Intimacy: How to Emotionally Connect With Customers". Retrieved 30 October 2018.
  2. ^ Reisinger, Don (March 20, 2017). "This Study Says Apple Is the World's Most Intimate Brand". Fortune. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  3. ^ Raza, Faizan (August 21, 2018). "Brand Intimacy Study Underscores Today's Nuances in Customer-Brand Relationships". Influencive. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  4. ^ "The Principles Of Brand Intimacy". Branding Strategy Insider. April 17, 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  5. ^ "Why Southwest Airlines has the 'brand intimacy' major competitors lack". Chicago Business Journal. April 17, 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.