Talk:1st Division (Vietnam)
Appearance
Content is primarily unnecessary content fork
The content so far is following up with 2nd Division (Vietnam) and 3rd Division (Vietnam), in that it uses sources dubbed "Official Military History" from its primary adversary in a conflict. As such it appears to be WP:CONTENTFORK with scant or virtually no details on the topic itself. Neither is it even treating the subject evenhandedly and existing as a repository for wikilinks. Virtually no details other than as a reference to activities of others are found here. 45.62.243.176 (talk) 07:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- A page about a military division is not a WP:CONTENTFORK! Do something useful and provide WP:RS if you disagree with what I have written, or, better yet leave Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A bicyclette#06 November 2018 Mztourist (talk) 08:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't get why you keep calling me a sockpuppet, this is a clearly paranoid accusation. Your edit should be in line with a neutral point of view, including indication of the source of the content. I'd recommend you look for relevant talk pages or discussion boards or wikiprojects if you want other users to help you find neutral WP:RS for improvement. Not my job, go find someone with more knowledge than 2 books. 45.62.243.176 (talk) 08:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)