Jump to content

User talk:Pbb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 01:07, 20 November 2018 (ArbCom 2018 election voter message: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Perfecto 04:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WinDiff screenshot

[edit]

Hoi Gerbrant,

Your WinDiff screenshot is a bit confusing. This should be a Windows program, but I can clearly see Macintosh controls. Is this a Macintosh skin, or a Macintosh port of the program? -- Peter 21:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Mac skin. You will notice that there are some differences between a Mac window and the skin, e.g. the colored buttons are on the right (on a Mac they are on the left). I'm so used to this skin that I didn't even think about it. Do you think it's really necessary to switch to one of the default skins? I'd rather not do that though, because it took some fiddling to get Windows to recognize the skin (Windows is a bit fascist about non-Microsoft-approved skins). Should I put a comment on the image description page? Shinobu 07:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tja, I just got a bit confused by it. Maybe a comment would be a good point. -- Peter 10:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oké, a comment it will be. Groetels, Shinobu 11:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pbb, first thanks a lot for digging up the 2 Jun 1992 draft of the HTML DTD. You asked for a citation in your edit [1]. I now added the missing sources, but the wiki seems not to like AFS links, neither in the afs://... scheme nor if I use file:///afs/... instead. Do you have any idea about how to get these links to work? --rtc (talk) 23:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You already found the right protocol, it's the Andrew File System... it's a generic remote filesystem accesss protocol similar to NFS and it can be accessed in hyperlinks just like a local file using the file:///afs/ path (once you installed AFS support on your system). I'm not sure specifying afs:// has ever been supported or actually in use, but it seems to be correct, too, at least in theory. I found this some time ago, it may be possible that they shut it down already... But just in case I made a full backup (320 MB). --rtc (talk) 10:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Update: The lost-contact AFS gateway which didn't work when I added the links is now working again. So I replaced the links to use this gateway: http://lost-contact.mit.edu/afs/cern.ch/w3.org/www/Frame/fminit2.0/html.dtd http://lost-contact.mit.edu/afs/cern.ch/w3.org/www/MarkUp/Connolly/921125/archive.sh#html.dtd --rtc (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Perhaps you are interested in this; it's a list with all known "traditonal" HTML versions (ie., from before HTML 3) that I made:

RevDateId
[0.0]02 Jun 1992
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-talk/1992MayJun/0020.html
[0.1]15 Jul 1992
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-talk/1992JulAug/0020.html
[0.2]06 Aug 1992unknown
[0.3]18 Aug 1992Id: html.dtd,v 1.1 92/08/19 18:37:58 connolly Exp
afs://cern.ch/w3.org/www/Frame/fminit2.0/html.dtd
[0.4]17 Nov 1992unknown
[0.5]19 Nov 1992unknown
[0.6]20 Nov 1992unknown
[0.7]22 Nov 1992unknown
1.124 Nov 1992Id: html.dtd,v 1.1 92/11/23 08:19:47 connolly Exp Locker: connolly
afs://cern.ch/w3.org/www/MarkUp/Connolly/921125/archive.sh
1.203 Dec 1992Id: html.dtd,v 1.2 92/12/02 20:04:15 connolly Exp
afs://cern.ch/w3.org/www/MarkUp/Connolly/921203/html.dtd
1.306 Jan 1993Id: html.dtd,v 1.3 93/01/06 18:38:10 connolly Exp
afs://cern.ch/w3.org/www/MarkUp/Connolly/930106/html.dtd
Note: Dan Connolly accidentally duplicated 1.3 as http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/html.dtd,v#1.5 while reconstructing the RCS archive from single files
[1.3.1.1]21 Jan 1993Id: html.dtd,v 1.4 93/01/20 20:56:08 connolly Exp
afs://cern.ch/w3.org/www/MarkUp/Connolly/930121/HTML.dtd
version 1.4 from the original ,v file
[1.3.1.2]03 Feb 1993Id: html.dtd,v 1.4 1993/02/03 21:30:13 connolly Exp
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/html.dtd,v#1.4
Copy of 1.4 from the original ,v file with <!SGML ...> removed; it is more recent than 1.4 from the original RCS file (it was "checked in with -k" into the reconstructed one)
[1.4]unknown(Id: html.dtd,v 1.3 93/01/06 18:38:10 connolly Exp)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iiir-html-00
This version incorrectly uses 0 instead of O in much of the SGML stuff.
[1.5]01 Jul 1993
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/draft-ietf-iiir-html-01.txt
1.6unknown
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/html.dtd,v#1.6
1.701 Apr 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.7 1994/04/01 19:21:25 connolly Exp
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/html.dtd,v#1.7
1.809 Apr 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.8 1994/04/09 01:02:10 connolly Exp
1.914 Apr 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.9 1994/04/14 01:23:26 connolly Exp
1.1015 Apr 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.10 1994/04/19 17:24:06 connolly Exp
1.1130 Apr 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.11 1994/04/30 03:17:56 connolly Exp
1.1217 May 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.12 1994/05/17 21:07:53 connolly Exp
1.1318 May 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.13 1994/05/18 17:23:29 connolly Exp
2.0Id: html.dtd,v 1.14 1994/06/03 20:02:52 connolly Exp
The first version to announce itself as HTML 2.0
[2.1]03 Jun 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.15 1994/06/03 22:09:14 connolly Exp
[2.2]13 Jun 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.16 1994/06/13 20:55:50 connolly Exp
This is the first version to split the DTD into html.decl, html.dtd, html-0.dtd and html-1.dtd (The RCS comment mentions html-2.dtd instead of html-0.dtd, but that must have been a typo). The toplevel html.dtd mainly includes html-1.dtd, which in turn includes html-2.dtd, so everything is now scattered over these three files.
[2.3]20 Jul 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.17 1994/07/20 15:46:38 connolly Exp
[2.4]20 Jul 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.18 1994/07/20 16:24:43 connolly Exp
[2.5]23 Sep 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.19 1994/09/23 22:46:51 connolly Exp
This version changes the layering technique; html.dtd contains all DTD again; html-1.dtd and html-0.dtd merely set appropriate flags and include html.dtd.
[2.6]26 Sep 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.20 1994/09/26 16:10:19 connolly Exp
[2.7]15 Nov 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.21 1994/11/15 19:54:38 connolly Exp
[2.8]30 Nov 1994Id: html.dtd,v 1.22 1994/11/30 23:45:40 connolly Exp
[2.9]28 Jan 1995Id: html.dtd,v 1.23 1995/01/28 05:59:34 connolly Exp
[2.10]06 Feb 1995Id: html.dtd,v 1.24 1995/02/06 21:28:45 connolly Exp
[2.11]29 Mar 1995Id: html.dtd,v 1.25 1995/03/29 18:53:13 connolly Exp
[2.12]02 Jun 1995Id: html.dtd,v 1.26 1995/06/02 08:00:02 connolly Exp
[2.13]15 Jun 1995Id: html.dtd,v 1.27 1995/06/15 20:17:03 connolly Exp
[2.14]16 Jun 1995Id: html.dtd,v 1.28 1995/06/16 18:54:22 connolly Exp
[2.15]04 Aug 1995Id: html.dtd,v 1.29 1995/08/04 17:50:22 connolly Exp
[2.16]21 Sep 1995Id: html.dtd,v 1.30 1995/09/21 23:30:19 connolly Exp

Hope it's interesting for you. --rtc (talk) 13:54, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese stubs

[edit]

I have reverted my previous edit to the affected article, hopefully it is a small mistake and hasn't affected anywhere else. Waacstats (talk) 21:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Popcorn Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YTS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Pbb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Pbb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Pbb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]