Jump to content

Google and privacy issues

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yawetag (talk | contribs) at 19:26, 10 November 2006 (Criticism: Changed "set to the" to "set to"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|March 2006|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.
As the world's biggest search and ad-broker company, Google has drawn its share of criticism and concern about the privacy of its users. Its privacy policy was revised on October 14 2005. Additionally, privacy info about various Google services was made also available.

Information collected by Google

Google uses a unique cookie for each browser used by an individual user on a computer. This cookie contains information which allows Google to identify records about that user on its database. This cookie is submitted every time a user does a Google search, visits a site using AdSense etc. The information stored in Google's database, which is identified by the cookie, includes

  • Everything you search for using Google
  • Every web page you visit that has Google Adsense ads on it
  • Every Blogger page you visit

If you have an Adsense account, the following will also be stored

  • Your full name, address and bank account details
  • The IP address of everyone who visits your pages with Adsense ads on them
  • The number of visitors to each of your pages with Adsense ads on them

If you use a Gmail account

  • Content and addresses of emails and Usenet posts you send or receive in an Gmail account

If you're a member of orkut

  • Your online social network, interests and groups

As well as

Other information is submitted by Google's utilities, such as Google Bar.

Google's stated policies

Some say that Google explicitly states it does not share individual users' information with third parties. The whole privacy statement can be read online [1].

Google's Information Rights clause (see paragraph #6) says Google may retain and use, and with good faith belief, access, preserve, or disclose any information deemed reasonably necessary to protect the "safety of Google".


Criticism

The main criticisms concerning privacy are:

  • The cookie's expiration date is set to January 17, 2038, 2:14:05 PM
  • There is no way a user can access or delete her/his user information kept by Google
  • There is no expiration/deletion policy for user information
  • There is no disclosure what the information is used for, e.g. target ads, targeted offers in affiliated shopping sites or targeted search results.

Google maintains that

We use cookies to improve the quality of our service and to better understand how people interact with us. Google does this by storing user preferences in cookies and by tracking user trends and patterns of how people search.

It is possible to delete the Google cookie at any time; however a new cookie and new records will be created the next time you visit Google or use a Google affiliated service. For each web-browser, on each computer you use, a different copy of the cookie will be stored, possibly referring to different records in the Google database.

In early 2006, the US Department of Justice filed a motion in federal court to force Google to comply with a subpoena for "the text of each search string entered onto Google's search engine over a one-week period (absent any information identifying the person who entered such query)." [2] Google resisted the subpoena and fought the motion, partially due to concerns about users' privacy. [3] In March 2006, the court ruled partially in Google's favor, recognizing the privacy implications of turning over search terms. [4]

Clandestine collaboration with the CIA

The former CIA officer Robert David Steele has implied that Google is secretly collaborating with the CIA. He claims the legal disputes in 2006 was just a charade for the public. Neither Google nor the CIA has commented on this. [5]

See also