User talk:GSS

Created Wikipedia page for actor Siddharth Mahesh

Hi Vinay Gowda created but he is not updated anything on the page, so please guide me how to verify wikipedia page and also uploading profile photo to the page

Deletion Discussion : Anil K Reji

Hey

The page Anil K Reji has been nominated for deletion. Kindly let me know what can be done to prevent the deletion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anil_K_Reji

Valid sources and news articles have been included as references in the article. But it still has been nominated for deletion. Kindly assist me through the walkthrough process of preventing the deletion.

Thanks.

Repeated Reverting on article on "Samiksha Jaiswal".

Respected Sir/Madam,

Please tell why are you repeatedly reverting the article on Samiksha Jaiswal to #Redirect Zindagi Ki Mehek?

@Helpful14: As Barkeep49 mentioned in the edit summary that the subject not yet demonstrated to be notable per WP:NACTOR so please do not revert as it's WP:TOOSOON for this actress to have a separate article. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018

Hello GSS, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news

• The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.

As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.

• There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.

Other

• A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.

Moving to Draft and Page Mover

• Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
• If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
• Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
• The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js^(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
• The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget. In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions. MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues. User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page) User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50). User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you. User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link. User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion. User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Varun Mitra - Redirected as WP:TOOSOON

Varun Mitra is a notable actor based in Mumbai, India. His debut film, 'Jalebi' will be releasing soon.

Prior to his, he has been a model, a tv actor and travel show host.

Hemamoolrajani (talk) 09:53, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

References

@Hemamoolrajani: Please see WP:NACTOR and WP:TOOSOON. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Fyers wikipedia page

Hi GSS

There is no personal interest in that page but can't I create a page if I have reliable resources.

Shashank10490 (talk) 14:35, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

@Shashank10490: Are you sure you don't have a conflict of interest (e.g. an employee or founding member etc.)?

You've got mail!

Hello, GSS. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 18:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

GAB^gab 18:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

Hi GSS,

I don't have any external relationship with the company. I had some references so i created that page.

Thank You.

Shashank10490 (talk) 13:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but there are a couple of links on Google that connects your username to the company. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Autar Kaw

Hello, thank you for reverting the edits on Autar Kaw. What tool can I use to detect plagiarised content on Wiki? Externally, I use Grammarly to review university course papers. Will that work? Have a great day :) Csgir (talk) 13:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

@Csgir: I personally use the Earwig's Copyvio Detector which I found very useful but you can also try Duplication Detector. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Have a great day :) Csgir (talk) 06:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Bajar

Are Bajar and this the same place? --Titodutta (talk) 00:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

No, see this, and I'm unable to locate any village in Punjab named Bajaran (possibly not legally recognised).​ GSS (talk|c|em) 06:18, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you. --Titodutta (talk) 10:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Reinvoking a deleted page

Hi GSS,

While I was recently trying to reinstate a deleted page, you noted that it was still 'too soon.' Specifically, you said that "That do not make her passes WP:NACTOR, If you want to work on this please use draftspace and submit it for a reveiw." Here is the log:

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Janhvi_Kapoor&action=history

However, I do not understand how it doesn't make her pass WP:NACTOR. She has one major film to her credit Dhadak, and is in the process of signing another film. Please clarify exactly what more criteria she needs? Her co-star in that movie, Ishaan Khatter, already has his own page and he has only acted in two films. ONE film is ALL that is needed, as per the WP:NYA criteria, to have her own page. Another criteria that is met is that the actor "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." Janhvi has this, as she has been a fan favorite amongst teenagers for a while now, and is considered one of the most popular young stars. There is no reason for her page to be kept locked any longer, and I should not have to use a draftspace for it to be reviewed. I will submit the page as a request for undeletion, instead. Thank you and looking forward to hearing your logic as to why she does not pass WP:NACTOR. Thanks.

Rush922 (talk) 09:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

WP:NACTOR states that a subject is deemed notable when they have participated in "multiple" notable productions (generally more than two) and she has only worked in one film so far and you must be aware that the article was deleted after a discussion so if you don't want to create a draft it's better to use the article talk page to discuss. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:33, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

You say she needs multiple films, but WP:NYA directly refutes that logic with an example with Paris Jackson:

"A good example of this is Paris Jackson, as seen at this Articles for Deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris Katherine Jackson. At the time of the discussion, she had been announced as the star of a film that would be released a year after – however, the film had not actually been released yet. If or when the film is released, and if Jackson is the star of the film, she likely will merit an article, but not until then."

This is in regards to Paris' FIRST film - and it states that as soon as it is released, she will merit her own page. Jahnvi is in this EXACT situation, and has MET that criteria (her film Dhadak just released this past July)!

Also, if you are going to apply that logic, then it doesn't make sense because her Dhadak co-star, Ishaan Khatter, also had a page created after his FIRST film, and NOBODY had a problem with that. Look at his page's revision history: sorted by 'oldest' -

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Ishaan_Khatter&dir=prev&action=history

You will see that they added the page soon after his film 'Beyond the Clouds' released, and everyone accepted it. Thus he only had ONE major starring role to his credit, and there was no issue.

Also, in pointing out the first rule of WP:NACTOR (which is a Notability rule), that she needs to have "multiple" notable productions, you forgot the rule stated in WP:NYA that states that the Notability rules do not ALL need to be followed, but at least ONE should be ("but if an actor cannot meet at least one of them, it is pretty much TOO SOON for an article to be considered.")

I submit the second rule for WP:NACTOR, which is: "2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following."

It is common knowledge in India that Janhvi Kapoor has been a media darling since her late teens, and has a huge fan base among teenagers and young adults. I'm sure that's one of the reasons why Nykaa brand cosmetics chose her to be their brand ambassador recently. Therefore, Janhvi DOES fit at least ONE of the notability rules, aside from the fact that she has had her own film (which is good enough in the Paris Jackson example for WP:NYA!), so I believe she counts as notable.

As for Janhvi's page being the topic of a discussion, this was probably the case because she had been selected as the cover of Vogue Magazine by June 2018, but she still had not done her first film and thus wasn't a person of significance. The controversial edits by people caused its deletion. I can understand that. But she HAS done her first film now, is brand ambassador for the makeup brand Nykaa, is a fashion icon for her large fan following and continues to do many interviews with reputed news outlets. Common sense says she is a noteworthy person deserving of her own page - this doesn't even merit a discussion because it is not ambiguous, it is clear for anyone to see.

Rush922 (talk) 11:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Maybe @Johnpacklambert, L3X1, and Winged Blades of Godric: can reply you on this. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Rush922,

TOOSOON is an essay (and quasi-poorly written, on top of that) and that was not a reason for reversion of your edits.Neither is that any qualifier/supplement of our notability-guidelines.So, I fail to gauge as to why you seek to override a guideline (which has been extensively vetted by the community) by deriving from that essay.

In wiki-parlance, TOOSOON simply means that the subject has a decent chance of passing the notability guidelines at some undefined point in future but as of now is yet to be notable.As simple and succinct as that.

The relevant guideline is this SNG and multiple refers to two or more, at bare-minimum.Whilst, the policies are a bit ambiguous (all SNGs state that they are subordinate to GNG et al), practice dictates that they are not.

SNGs have essentially provided a good editorial tool to sieve encyclopedic-characters from the frenzied-media-coverage about 21st century entertainment et al whilst also removing systemic bias, as evident from the lax guidelines of WP:NPROF.

Furthermore, being a brand-ambassador of a make-up brand does not lend any notability and frankly, if you believe in such a concept, it is ridiculous.

And, no, being a media-darling has not got to do with notability.She is a media-darling mostly because of the adulation of paperazzi with star-daughters.As an encyclopedia, we have a responsibility to distinguish between trivial-gossip-coverage and significant coverage.

If you believe that all media-darlings ought to be featured in Wikipedia, because they can comfortably pass GNG, Taimur Ali Khan Pataudi looks to be a decent target, to try out upon.

At the end of my note, I will concede that it's perfectly plausible that my impression about the existent sourcing is wrong.In that case, I would ask you to provide three/four decent sources that covers her significantly in a professional non-gossipy, non-promotional manner (No interviews, please) and if that satisfies me, I will main-space it for you.

Best, ∯WBG^converse 14:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Oh, so TOOSOON was not a reason for reversion of the edits, you say? It was the First reason that User:GSS cited to revert my edits:

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Janhvi_Kapoor&action=history

Check out the third edit down from the top of the page. User:Gss clearly made the summary: "(Reverted to revision 854605999 by GSS (talk): This is still a case of WP:TOOSOON. (TW)) (undo | thank) (Tags: New redirect, Undo)"

So before you make accusations like that, please check the history of the page you are commenting on, because otherwise to make such a bold yet false assertion is laughable and doesn't do you much credit as a reviewer.

You say, "Neither is that any qualifier/supplement of our notability-guidelines.So, I fail to gauge as to why you seek to override a guideline (which has been extensively vetted by the community) by deriving from that essay." But it IS a qualifier of the notability guidelines, is says so itself! I will quote it directly: "An actor might merit an article in Wikipedia if they meet any of the various notability criteria as set out by guidelines at WP:Notability and/or the various applicable topic-specific notability sub-sections, as explained above. The guidelines do not mandate that all or even that most of these criteria have to be met..." And who are you to dictate to me what guideline is or isn't vetted by the community? The community doesn't run Wikipedia, the rules and common sense do, or should. I have no idea what 'guidelines' the 'community' vets extensively or not, all I see is the rules themselves written on the pages, "As simple and succinct as that." The fact that you are heavy-handedly interpreting what the guidelines are 'supposed' to mean, instead of what the rules themselves say they are, is very telling in your arrogant dismissal of my viewpoint. Is every new user supposed to go through the maze of what the 'community' has established as a status-quo rule, something which is not immediately obvious? If something is not expressly written, what gives you ANY justification for arguing for it in the first place?

You say, "Whilst, the policies are a bit ambiguous (all SNGs state that they are subordinate to GNG et al), practice dictates that they are not." What do you mean 'practice dictates?' And how exactly are newer users supposed to know what is dictated by 'practice?' This is just another arrogant imposition from you, the people who deem how things 'have always been done,' versus newer people who go by the written guidelines. The only thing that should matter is what the rules say, not what the 'community' has deemed standard as per their 'practice.'

You say, "Being a brand-ambassador of a make-up brand does not lend any notability and frankly, if you believe in such a concept, it is ridiculous." Ridiculous? Are you kidding me? The very REASON a brand would pick someone to endorse them is BECAUSE they are considered socially notable! Keep in mind we are talking about the entertainment industry- she is an actor in the first place. A name brand company would obviously not have her endorse them if she had not accomplished anything of note in her respected sphere to begin with. Frankly, I think you are being far too picky and judgmental regarding what fits the 'criteria' for the sake of the 'purity' of what you deep to be the 'great encyclopedia' that is Wikipedia- you yourself are NOT the sole interpreter of what works - a little common sense would show you that an actor endorsing a name-brand makeup IS quite notable.

You also say, "As an encyclopedia, we have a responsibility to distinguish between trivial-gossip-coverage and significant coverage." It's as if you've forgotten entirely that we are dealing with the entertainment industry, really.

And no, I do not believe all media darlings deserve a space in Wikipedia, I only mentioned it because it was a relevant corollary to the fact that she had released her first film. Taimur Ali Khan is an infant, obviously he wouldn't be notable- quite frankly, I find it insulting that you would use him to make a point when common sense would tell you that my reference to Janhvi's media following was only relevant in light of the fact that she was an actress. The very REASON the page was deleted in the first place was because of that reason-people wrongly assumed social following was enough! If that's the case, I could easily try to make a page for Suhana Khan, Shahrukh Khan's daughter, who arguably not only has a bigger fan following than Janhvi but also has graced the cover of Vogue India as well. But I KNOW I couldn't do that, because I KNOW being a media darling isn't enough. Please get a grip on yourself and try and read between the lines of what I wrote.

Quite frankly, I'm a little surprised that you're taking such an immature and snarky attitude like this, to counteract my argument, when it is entirely undeserved and when I'm simply arguing for the release of a page that is quite a bit overdue.

Also, neither you nor user:GSS have commented on the argument above that I posted, made on WP:TOOSOON, regarding the Paris Jackson example, which exactly echoes Janhvi's now. Don't try to nullify what that page says out of YOUR interpretation of its lack of importance - the page stands on its own- if it's importance is not expressly stated, WHO are YOU to determine that it's not really saying what it means? If that example states that Paris would deserve her own page (as common sense says she would), there is no reason Janhvi wouldn't: "A good example of this is Paris Jackson, as seen at this Articles for Deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris Katherine Jackson. At the time of the discussion, she had been announced as the star of a film that would be released a year after – however, the film had not actually been released yet. If or when the film is released, and if Jackson is the star of the film, she likely will merit an article, but not until then."

To conclude, I find your demeanor condescending and quite undeservedly so. I am not going to acquiese to your request for additional sources. If you cannot use basic common sense, respect the rules as they are and not how you deem need be interpreted, nor can you respect the ignorance of newcomers, you are a pretty sad example of someone who has administrative power and I will reserve my attention for those who are more worthy of that privilege. Thank you.

Rush922 (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni:, can you help out a bit, please? Esp. on SNG vs GNG, coverage-style and it's relevance and practice vs policy et al; Contrary to many folks over somewhere, I personally find youd remarks to be aimed at peaceful collaboration and bring newer perspectives, esp. to newbies:-) ∯WBG^converse 17:19, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Whilst GSS might have chosen to include WP:NACTOR in his reasoning, the spirit of the comment clearly meant that the outcome of previous AfD was still valid enough (and, it's a failure of NACTOR) and that it is still too soon for her to be encylopedic. Nothing else, at all.

As to the difference between an essay, a guideline and a policy, read the linked pages. To surmise, whilst all those pages that belong to the latter two categories have been vetted by the community, essays are typically not. They often serve as an interpretation of different policies by different individuals.

So, what is contained as an example in WP:NYA was a choice of a particular user and there is no evidence that the community resonates with the thought.

(FWIW, even in the example, the word likely has been used.)

Contrarily, the SNG that I linked to (NACTOR) has been rigorously vetted by the community.

So, I don't see any reason to defend a failure of a community-vetted notability guideline against a quasi-loophole in a non-vetted essay.

And, no we don't consider that featuring in brand endorsements or fraturing in advertisements of noted companies lend any to notability.

And, by we, I mean a considerable majority of our editorial community, about whom, I am obviously more aware-about than you.

Also, if you mean that nearly all sourcing in the environment industry is gossip-like and that given proffesional coverage is rare (which is actually wrong for enough-distinguished film personalities) we need ro acvept gossip/promo-stuff as the new-normal, I vehemently disagree and will request you to have a look at the several GAs and FAs at the Film Portal, which includes Indian film-stars.

You raise an interesting question as to how new users are supposed to learn these practices.

I regrettably , can't offer any definite answer other than the fact that over here, practise gradually morphs into policy and the best means, a new user can foem his own interpretation of varipus policies et al is to participate in different discussion venues and derive from thought lines of experienced editors.

I, know that the inner-workings of Wikipedia can seem to be bizarelly byzantine for a new-comer. But that, we have spent far more than time over here than you have and having contributed to numerous articles , we have a fairly-good understanding of the interpretations of our policies.

Please tone down your rhetoric a bit, ask questions and indulge in the journey.

Best, ∯WBG^converse 17:58, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

(Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rush922/subpage/JanhviK - this is the subpage and draft I created to review/discuss reinstatement. After reading the below, let's please continue discussion on the talk page of that link)

Thanks User:Winged Blades of Godric for this answer, as it seems far more reasonable and balanced than your first one. Allow me to respond here briefly because I would like to continue this discussion elsewhere, as we both noted on User:Amorymeltzer‎'s talk page recently.

You ask me to discern the difference between an Essay, a Guidline, and a Policy by reading the linked pages. I would gladly do so, and WILL do so in the future, but therein lies the issue with newcomers that you later admitted yourself - who really has the time or patience to understand these differences? I would probably never have come across either these pages, or specifically the policy pages for Notability and TooSoon, had it not be pointed out to me by others. The only real way to assimilate them would be by practice, as you hinted. I admit that this whole debate about Kapoor's page-reinstation has been a great learning tool and exercise for me, not only in learning the technicalities of Wikipedia but also as an exercise in sheer will power to assert what I believe is right. A while ago I misunderstood photo-copyright laws and accidentally added pics on some pages incorrectly- I was flagged and had to discuss/argue my way out of it. The same thing happened a bit later when I had a few good-faith edits reverted by someone - I had to discuss to get clarification. So now with this page, I'm trying to see if I can get this page reinstated as well as would make sense to me. In a way it's as much about getting Janhvi Kapoor's page rightfully reinstated, as it is an integration of my own personal learning. As you said, it's a process.

That being said, I noted that you keep pressing the fact that the community has strongly vetted the WP:NACTOR page but not the TooSoon page, which you acknowledge is an Essay. But I'm sure it's apparent to you that from a purely visual standpoint, both pages look absolutely identical in terms of content, especially when you are taken directly to the middle of either page via shortcut. The ONLY way I learned about the hierarchy of validity of either of these pages is by scrolling ALL the way to the top and reading the Clarifying Header-Textboxes for each. I otherwise would have never guessed that one has more validity than the other. The shortcuts to both start with WP:; if an essay is less important, why not give it a different shortcut preface, like WPE (as in E for Essay) or something? That would be easier to discern.

Another 'loophole' I found is that regardless of how strongly vetted you say NACTOR is, the very Header-Textbox for that page itself states that the statements therein can be taken with a grain of salt, based on common sense: "It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page." According to me, common sense would state that in some cases for an actor, having a fan following or brand endorsements CAN institute notability IF the actor has a major socially-counted work (like a film - which is viewed by the general population at large) in their name. Someone else, like a Youtube star for example, may also have brand endorsements, but their notability in that case would probably be limited to their subscriber count, overall visibility, and length of time they have been counted 'at the top,' of that Youtube space (either via financial earnings or view count, etc), for example. That is why it is good to have discussions like these, I suppose.

To conclude, I would like to wrap up the discussion on this page and invite both you and User:GSS to the subpage I created for reinstating Kapoor's page. I couldn't open her draft page, as it was blocked, and the talk-page on the original Janhvi Kapoor page wouldn't let me cite sources, so I had to use a subpage. Here is the link (which I also posted at the top of this comment), and you can start discussions on its talk page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rush922/subpage/JanhviK

Thanks and happy discussing.

Rush922 (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Prakash Neupane

• Hi Gss last time also you process my prakash neupane deletion. but now he has enough notability like he have own music awards h=and featured into more international music blogs and national newspaper. so, why it's rejected? 27.34.68.202 (talk) 15:01, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

@27.34.68.202: What you mean last time? are you Gaurav456? GSS (talk|c|em) 15:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

• what mean Gaurav456 ? can't you check the history of article and xfd closer? 27.34.68.202 (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

• His song Timro Najik is charted here: [1], his song has won national music award which is shown here [2][3] and he has artist page too. He has been featured in Naational Television[4] , Radio Kantipur [5] and News papers. And it shows that he has released 3 Albums in National newspaper Nagarik (daily).[6] than how has not fullfill the criteria? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.34.68.202 (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Additional info: He has been featured in Kathmandu Tribune[7] Nepal Television, Kantipur FM, ABC Television (Nepal) which is reliable source and other major National newspapers which are in wikipedia. So, without doing research how can you decline wiki draft? You're not even a Nepali editor? 27.34.68.202 (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

• Additional Info: He has fullfilled wikipedia Notability for WP:MUSICBIO[8] criteria no 1, 5, 8, 10, 11 and 12. 27.34.68.202 (talk) 15:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:54, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I have already replied to the IP who I suspect is evading their block. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Unda (film)

This film has not began filming, hence violates WP:NFF. Qualifies for deletion.2405:204:D00B:BF64:CD00:1DE2:A806:C03E (talk) 16:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Dont remove Naveed Qazi. these are all recognised and respected regional sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FifthHouseGuy (talk • contribs) 18:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

gss i am not getting money for any edit

i did not doing paid work here. all my article was written for free of cost — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrRock9 (talk • contribs) 12:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

PBSC Urban Solutions

Hello, I would like to understand your reasoning for reverting my removal of adspeak from the PBSC Urban Solutions article. My changes removed language like "PBSC Urban Solutions is a global provider of bike sharing solutions", "A $5M investment in research and development has enabled PBSC to offer eco-friendly intuitive technology solutions such as their solar-powered docking stations", "PBSC currently has three bike models on the market, designed to meet the needs of a variety of riders" which sound like they were written by a PR firm and are not anywhere near what WP:NPOV requires. They also restored information about the corporate restructuring that occurred due to PBSC's financial problems in 2013-14. 67.71.37.61 (talk) 21:18, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

I have restored your version per WP:AGF. GSS (talk|c|em) 03:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

/* Star martin */

I have appeal to delete this article if I try to recreate will you give me the permission for article edit... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater (talk • contribs) 13:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

You must stick to the draftspace and that is only what I can suggest. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello GSS

Hello GSS, Can i know why you have tagged me in sockpuppet accounts. I think it may be by mistake. Please remove me from that list. ~Inked Soul~ (talk • contribs) 06:32, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Redirecting page Samiksha Jaiswal

Why are you again and again redirecting the page Samiksha Jaiswal even after providing suitable data and reliable references? I request you to please not do this again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helpful14 (talk • contribs) 07:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

@Helpful14: Please see WP:NACTOR and don't remove the redirect again or else it will be nominated for deletion. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 07:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

I'm not a paid wiki writer or editor

Hi GSS, I didnt get paid for editing any article at all on wikipedia and that notice of $ payment on Bia Mustafa Alloush page is by mistake, it was created through article for creation and I was aware and followed the topic Bia Mustafa Alloush since the beginning, if you need more proof I can provide you any thing you ask for, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalrahal (talk • contribs) 08:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

@Bilalrahal: Do you know Bia Mustafa Alloush personally? and what is your connection with user KarenLima33? Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 09:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

I Dont Know Bia Mustafa Alloush in person nor karenlima. I'm an average contributor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalrahal (talk • contribs) 09:51, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

@Bilalrahal: In your first edit at help desk you said last year one of Wikipedia team deleted an entire wiki page entry I created for an artist that I represent can you please name that article. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

I'm not a paid wiki writer or editor. Yes it was for Bia Alloush, I said I'm an average user, when I came across a new article of Bia Alloush I participated as a contributor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalrahal (talk • contribs) 11:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

I represent the deleted article not the artist. A misunderstanding just to clarify. Just to clarify the previous post. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalrahal (talk • contribs) 11:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

@Bilalrahal: So you want me to belive that you don't represent the artist, and you don't have any relation with the subject (family, friends, clients, employers etc.) am I right? GSS (talk|c|em) 11:21, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Its up to you to believe or not, I have no business to claim any thing or pretend, also I'm a full time employee in another company domain, and not always available here on wiki as a full time to keep explaining my self, you can check my log from last year I never been here much, I'm just a volunteer. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalrahal (talk • contribs) 11:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Chhakka Panja 3

The film is releasing from tomorrow. Please remove redirect from the article if it meets the criteria. RHcosm (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

@RHcosm: Please wait till the film receive some reviews in reliable sources. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 12:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Adam Leber

Hi GSS, thanks for reviewing my submission. I am not a paid editor and I do not have connection to the subject. The photo used was one I took as I have met Leber previously at an industry event. I've removed the Philanthropy section in the draft as I realize that it was not properly supported. If there are any other changes required please let me know. Thanks! Sambres8 (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

@Sambres8: Please feel free to submit your draft for review by clicking on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page also can you please provide a reliable source to support his date of birth. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 18:13, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

There was a Variety article about his birthday party but after reviewing I realize it doesn't explicitly list his birth date, going to remove that. Just to clarify why would I need to submit for review vs reverting the deletion to the revised draft? Thanks for your help! Sambres8 (talk) 18:34, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

I'm not actually convinced with your claim that you don't have a COI for several reasons e.g. how you know his date of birth and how you know he's active since 1999? both claims are unsourced and unverifiable for me so that's why I asked you to submit your draft for review. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:24, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Sreenath Raghunath

So Sreenath Raghunath has been recreated. I was reluctant when I came across it through NPP to nominate for AfD since I honestly don't know what weight that crowd will give to the various bug fighting HOFs. Given the likely but undisclosed COI I leave it in your capable admin hands about what the next steps are but thought I'd ping you about its recreation in case it wasn't on your watchlist (or got buried there). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

And I clearly needn't have worried as you were all over it :). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

@Barkeep49: I have moved it back to draftspace and have filled the SPI too Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sreenathaywenz. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 17:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Sreenath Raghunath

Hello, Why the page of Sreenath Raghunath page is drafted? May I know the reason? I have submitted all the required reference links. And of course that is not a paid work. Please acknowledge. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreenathr10 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

@Sreenathr10: See my last two messages on your talk page. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gigcity

I am writing to discuss your suggestion to delete User:Gigcity based on U5 Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#U5

My initial use of Wikipedia was actually to help document ImaginAsian as user 63.145.7.103 -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/63.145.7.103

Unfortunately, that user account was associated with an old email address (possibly one associated with ImaginAsian Entertainment). I created my current user:Gigcity account in 2008.

I understand that under my current user:Gigcity it shows a very limited contribution to Wikipedia but I can assure you that my intentions are NOT to use the tool for self-aggrandization. Is there a way that I can demonstrate or recover user:63.145.7.103?

Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gigcity (talk • contribs) 20:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Bkleinberg block appeal

Hey GSS, you submitted an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bkleinberg which led to the block of User:Bkleinberg. That user has now submitted a block appeal. If you would like, your comments on the appeal would be appreciated. Thank you! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

The APX

Hi! You unpublished the The_APX article which I published yesterday. I was reading the about the draft process from [9] and it says "anonymous editors, or registered editors not autoconfirmed, will need to request publication". I am not an anonymous editor nor non-autocormied so I should be allowed to make the move, right? Jjanhone (talk) 07:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

@Jjanhone: Anyone except editors with COI. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:26, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Could that be added to the policy too? Jjanhone (talk) 07:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

See WP:PAY for better understanding. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:31, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

It says "If you are an administrator, you must not use administrative tools". I am not an admin so I do not have access to admin tools either. So moving pages is not admin work?Jjanhone (talk) 08:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

GSS, you asked me a question around this. You asked via email. I don't think your question was particularly confidential, but just in case you thought it was, I'm being careful with my response. No, there was nothing better there. The article itself (not the draft) previously went through an AfD. At that point, it had less content than the current draft. --Yamla (talk) 11:35, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Paid editing of Tieto

Hi! You've added a tag on Tieto article saying it cointains paid editing. If you were referring to me (as you've added the same tag to my other articles) please look at the history of that article more carefully: I haven't edited the article.Jjanhone (talk) 04:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

That wasn't because of you. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:18, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

help Me to get the Genuine & authentic articles live

This is really bad, if experts on Wikipedia will not help us to improve the article. They just delete the articles after all very strong citations. Please check Vikram Gandhi help me how i can contribute on these type on article email (Redacted)

@Khalidgaur: First can I know who asked you to create this article? and what is your relationship with Roxanamathew and Kntrolsp who created . @Cyberpower678 can you please take care of this edit as well. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:54, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

@GSS: Nobody asked me to create this article and i don't know any of these people Roxanamathew and Kntrolsp, even i was not aware that this page was previously tried to get live. I know lots famous Indian personalities. They do not have Wikipedia page after all their great online news citations. So, i tried to make it live and other pages too. But, every time i get fail as other Wikipedia editors take it negatively. If there is proper citations link and article about the genuine personality. Why its been deleted? Should in need to share the Indian personalities name with you who don't have Wikipedia page? So, you live them on Wikipedia, most trusted website

Request on 04:25:02, 20 October 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Bablu Baghel

• Bablu Baghel (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sudip Pandey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Sir, I've stated Sudip Pandey as one of a friend suggest me to write his biography on Wikipedia before starting I have seen good reliable news/media sources. But as on the second attempt I have found many media and sources link about his films and seen so many films of Sudip Pandey. we must be thinking if an actor has done 30+ films in his career as a lead actor it's a big achievement. so his fans must be interested to know about him.

News Source: Times of India Topic :

sir under the topic all links is available under the blow :

Topics mention Blow :

• Amitabh Bachchan is the only superstar: Sudip Pandey
• Sudip Pandey in Paro Patnawali :

• Sudip Pandey is a well-acclaimed actor of the Bhojpuri film industry.

• Ghajab Siti Maarey Saiyaa Pichwarey released in Mumbai - Times of India '

So I Think about the re-creation of an article for Sudip Pandey news sources is meet Wikipedia policies. I strongly recommended rethinking about deletion. if is a possibility to re-edit the article.

I would like to request you kindly give me your guidance which required to fulfil the Wikipedia:Notability.

Thank you Bablu Baghel

Bablu Baghel 04:25, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

References

@Bablu Baghel: No the sources you provided above do not support notability, the first one is an interview and rest of them are just mirror copies of some unreliable sites (see at the end of each page). I also left a notice on your talk page regarding paid editing which you need to disclose as per WP:UPE and your relation with user Pappuad who also known as M.k.pappu. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:18, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

multiple accounts

Dear GSS, I only use this account and contribute using this account or without login. I have another account which I dont use but was saved in my browser and by mistake i logged into that account while making an edit. I am not coordinating with anybody but myself. I sometimes make edits without login as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalra.avneet (talk • contribs) 08:49, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

@Kalra.avneet: In that case, you need to make a disclosure on your user page by using {{User alternative account name}} or one of a selection of userboxes listed here. Also, you were advised to declare a conflict of interest on your talk page, but you have not yet responded, so I request you to read the conflict of interest policy and make the required disclosure. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 11:18, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello GSS, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal

• There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
• Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!

Project updates

• ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
• There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.

New scripts

• User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js^(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

sanjay chhimpa

why page remove of sanjay chhimpa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjay98chhimpa (talk • contribs) 12:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

@Sanjay98chhimpa: Becasue the subject do not meet the notability requirements. Please see WP:MUSICBIO and WP:RS. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 12:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Edits made in Ram Awana Page

hi, Thank you for your reply. Whatever changes I made, have video references on youtube or some other sites. Can I not add such references? as Ram Awana is an actor internet is providing only video references. Please suggest what can I do. User:Gazal288 (talk) Thank you, Gazal288

Template:Advert tag on the article Stora Enso

Hi, GSS, I have noticed that you recently added the Template:Advert tag to the article Stora Enso. Under the heading When to use on the help page for the tag, the following explanation can be found: "Add this to articles that need help from other editors because in whole or part they are advertisements masquerading as articles. For example, they may tell users to buy the company's product, provide price lists, give links to online sellers, or use unencyclopedic or meaningless buzzwords. The advert tag is for Wikipedia articles that in whole or part have been made into public relations documents or brochures, with content that portrays an issue, a product, an organization, or a person in a positive or negative light."

I would appreciate if you could provide examples of language or content in the Stora Enso article that you consider fits with any of these descriptions. While there is no doubt room for improvements to the wording of individual sentences in the article, I cannot find anything that justifies the judgement implied by the "advert" tag. On the contrary, to the best of my interpretation efforts, my view is that the article only contains information that is relevant to the general reader, encyclopaedic in character and backed up by solid third-party sources. OttoG (talk) 17:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

GSS

Hello Dear Sir/Madam May I know what's the issue about Articles that I moved recently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pardeeps (talk • contribs) 06:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

@Pardeeps: Please do not add unnecessary disambiguation to the title, as you did with Mehtiana, which you originally created at Mehtiana, Punjab. I have moved the page to correct title as there is no other place with the same name exists. Please see WP:TITLE and WP:NCIND for more information. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 06:40, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Rachel Kadish article

Dear GSS, I am online now, if you want to chat, I'm happy to. I will be on a few conference calls throughout the day (in the US), but will be as respsonsive as possible. Best regards, PLforWP (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello GSS,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW

• Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

moved page Balaji Sanala to Draft:Balaji Sanala

"without leaving a redirect: No evidence of notability. Please vet through" Please suggest me what to do to move it back to normal article. Thank you Anil kari — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anilkari.ui (talk • contribs) 07:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi just checked my draft Michael Katz (Chef) and saw I had to declare disclosure through a paid agreement. I'm reapplying the page with a disclosure tag at the top of the page and edit summary. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Katz_(chef)

Anya Rubstein (talk) 12:41, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Articles deletion

Hello, I noticed that you deleted three articles I created, in two of them, you said: "Paid editors articles should go through WP:AFC to ensure neutrally worded articles." Is this a rule? if so, Where this is written in Wikipedia's instructions and guidelines? I've read all the things related to paid writing and contacted many editors and also admins before, no one ever mentioned such a thing. Braindot4 (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

@Braindot4: See WP:PAY for more details on paid editing. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 03:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Linda Cable UDP, why ?

Hi ! You put https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Linda_Cable a banner for supposed "article created or edited in return for undisclosed payments', but Sir, I published on my page Heralune, before I begin the article, that Mrs Linda Cable asked me to organize her biography and sources to publish (if possible) an article for her, it's official and it's through plateform Upwork. I have followed the rules of Wikipedia policy and you can see on my page that it is true/ Can you remove this banner ? I am NOT hiding the payments, I am following the rules. Thanks for your reply. Heralune (talk) 12:37, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

@Heralune: Actually, the disclosure was not clear whether you were paid or you are a friend of Linda Cable so, please see WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY and follow the instructions carefully, if you need any help please feel free to ask. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

@GSS: I have put the boxes like suggested, thanks, but it's a mess, I struggled with guides but could only create 2 different boxes. I cannot gather onto one. Later, can you remove the banner on my draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Linda_Cable ?

 Done. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Dr. Quraishi

Hi there, I had intended to quickly put up a short article about Dr. Azra Quraishi, and now it is dominating my day. Any chance you can suggest specific quick fixes to that page to prevent its speedy deletion?

Please note that while Dr. Quraishi was celebrated in Pakistan, the level of documentation is comparatively lower because (1) she died in 2002 before everyone had copious internet records of everything, and (2) botanists are generally not high-profile - and particularly not in Pakistan - and especially not if you are a woman. The fact that she won awards in France and Pakistan, (which was published in the Pakistan Journal of Botany) should show her notability. Everything I wrote can be verified, and I emailed the Palmes Academique in France to double verify the award in 2002.

I do not understand how to sign my post but I'll add 4 tildes below. It's Saba Ahmad: SabaBPC

SabaBPC (talk) 21:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) If what you state is true then the Dr. is not notable for inclusion without third party sources, see WP:EXISTENCE. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Review

Please see to the new references I have added on the article I have created. They were earlier absent in previously deleted article. That's why I have pushed the recreation. Please, see. Thank you. UjjawalKrishnam (talk) 04:45, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Apologies for not disclosing payment information.

Dear GSS,

Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention.

I was trying to get started in online freelancing work, and I found someone looking for help with Wikipedia editing. I didn't know about the payment rules, but it makes sense and I was stupid to accept the job. I just thought I'd be helping with editing. I made a page from the information I was given that followed Wikipedia guidelines. The person who hired me was angry and made me change everything to the way you see it now. Basically an ad.

I never wanted to lower the value of Wikipedia as a whole with this kind of work. I'm really sorry, and I understand if I am banned from editing. I have disclosed the payment information on my user page. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to rectify this.

@Hakimj: I've deleted the page nominated by GSS, but you are not blocked from editing. From what you have written above, I hope that you have learned from this. I see that you have made constructive edits elsewhere, but even so, if you post obvious promo or act as an undeclared paid editor again, it's very unlikely that you will get another chance Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:13, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rahul Mandal for deletion

This also means you can't keep re-directing the page and deleting previous edits. Is that understood? You need to invite feedback on your proposal to edit. How are people supposed to do this if you keep re-directing? HardB (talk) 07:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 08:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

SEARCH Fdn

Hi, you keep putting 'notability' & COI tags on the SEARCH Foundation page, even though I've added extra information regarding notability and additional citations. Those tags may have been justified before, but I don't think they are anymore. Thanks. Locochoko (talk) 11:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Help in publishing my article to Mainspace

{{Help me}} Hello GSS I,ve updated my recent article with more citations and sources, how do I move it to mainspace. Kindly help. Thanks --Blendar33 (talk) 08:59, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Created Wikipedia page for Lucky Bisht but was declined by GSS

I have created wikipedia page for Lucky Bisht (Draft Link - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lucky_Bisht) and included reference links i.e. coverage in leading news portals. It was declined by you multiple times. Last time I included the news exactly published on the portals which were rejected due to copyright issues. Admin suggested to rewrite the article in my own language and provide proper references. I tried writing it again in simple language and added necessary links.

How to get this wikipedia article approved and publish. Please help. 2405:204:2082:BCD7:6C20:EF85:8C26:957 (talk) 09:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)BS

Regarding the article Rajdweep

This should be on Wikipedia. Because Rajdweep is a well known lyricist, journalist, script writer, playwright from Assam. The previous articles on him were deleted because those did not had proper references to support. But now with the article I gave proper references. It should not be moved to be draft. Please go through the reference links.

Valid sources and news articles have been included as references in the article. But it still has been nominated for deletion. Kindly assist me through the walkthrough process of preventing the deletion.

Thanks.-- Axomiya deka (talk • contribs)

@Axomiya deka: First, you need to stop posting this article directly in mainspace under this or any other name. The current sources do not establish notability and, most of them are not reliable so, you need to provide some reliable sources that talk about the subject directly and in details. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Regarding article Mari Selvaraj

Hi GSS,

I would like to understand why you reverted my edit for the article on Mari Selvaraj ? I have added additional information with reference. I could not understand why individual name should redirect to an film page. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabhunkl (talk • contribs) 16:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi GSS,

May I know why you reverted my changes in the page Mari Selvaraj today ? I like to get explanation please.

Request to move page Draft:Rajdweep to Rajdweep

Hi GSS Greetings! It has been observed that you have moved the page Rajdweep to Draft:Rajdweep. As I know Rajdweep is a talented scriptwriter who has already won various prestigious awards and recognitions in the arena. Recently he has won the Cinestaan- India'a biggest script contest juried by hon'ble Aamir Khan, Anjum Rajabali, Juhi Chaturvedi and Rajkumar Hirani. (you can find the details here https://scriptcontest.cinestaan.com/). He also scored for MTV Deewarist, Some Bollywood numbers (you may please find the details here https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7376968/?ref_=nv_sr_1).

He is a popular lyricist in Assamese music industry as well as bengali musics. It really deserves a article in Wikipedia about his works. Request you to move the page Draft:Rajdweep to Rajdweep please. Jamini.bargohain (talk) 06:36, 29 November 2018 (UTC)