Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marquis Wright

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marquis Wright

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restored following PROD at the subject's request, but there's no evidence he passes the notability requirements for college football athletes nor does his subsequent career establish general notability. StarM 03:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. StarM 03:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. StarM 03:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. StarM 03:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article created by a single purpose editor. The sources in the article are either not "independent" or do not constitute "significant" coverage. Fails under WP:GNG, WP:NGRIDIRON, and WP:NCOLLATH. Cbl62 (talk) 05:41, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the article is written, it seems to be somewhat promotional in nature and the sources don't seem to be providing any notability or significant coverage--just basic statistics, which widely are considered to not be enough to pass the threshold of notability standards. I also see the subject as failing WP:GNG, WP:NGRIDIRON, and WP:NCOLLATH .--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the previous comments. I don't see that he meets WP:GNG, WP:NGRIDIRON, or WP:NCOLLATH. Papaursa (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteI PRODed this page months ago because the subject is clearly not notable. The deletion was literally protested by the subject himself in order to have the page about him un-deleted. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.