Talk:CinemaScore

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CinemaScore article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada

Citations

Audiences Give Remember the Titans the Highest Score of the Millennium!

Citations. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CinemaScore alternatives -- 93.107.205.166 (talk) 18:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A+ but not F?

Given that CinemaScores are biased in favor of films (early audiences tend to include a lot of fans of the stars/director/genre/franchise), an F score is more unlikely and -- IMO -- more noteworthy. The numbers bear this out: 19 F's vs. 77 A+'s.[1]

Is there a reason we haven't listed them? - SummerPhD^v2.0 23:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course: because it's hard work. With calm and a lot of trust. Mauro Lanari --82.84.17.33 (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issue

@Nardog: I'm trying to say that, if the HTML5 of WP doesn't provide better solutions, we are forced to choose between the annoyance of some films whose title repeats and the impossibility to see how many times the filmmakers are on the list. And since an entire paragraph of the article is dedicated to this second aspect, it would no longer be verifiable. That's why IMHO so it's the lesser evil. But if the consensus decides otherwise, obviously that's fine. --Mauro Lanari 82.84.35.66 (talk) 09:26, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]