User talk:TelosCricket
 | This user is busy deciphering the secrets of nature and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome!
Hey, Telos, welcome to Wikipedia! I don't have anything specific to say, really, just happened to see your userpage pop up in the Recent Changes feed and wanted to say hi. :) If I may plug a project for a moment, the Teahouse is a good place to go if you have any questions about Wikipedia; it's a good place to get 'em answered in a friendly environment. Cheers, and happy editing! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 21:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
TelosCricket, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
|
Hi TelosCricket!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 18:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC) |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
--
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
--
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Please take a brief survey about The Wikipedia Adventure
Hi! Thanks for playing The Wikipedia Adventure, or at least considering it. We'd like to hear about your thoughts and feelings on the game, to help us improve it. Please take this brief survey: 10 minute survey.
- --thanks and cheers, Ocaasi 20:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Tipulidae
Thankyou TelosCricket.I have just returned to work on the Diptera (once my profession) following a hobby diversion (wikiproject Lepidoptera) partly due to my friend Giancarlo Dessi's departure from Wiki Italy.Tipulidae raised an immediate problem due to different views of Limoniidae (inae in the U.S.A). and Europe (idae). There are also differences in the morphology terminology which will take some sorting out.My literature is mainly German and Russian (including Russian Far East not referenced yet.I will overhaul Limoniidae next.Then come back to the biology of both families.The identification works I cite are out of date but very useful and free.Books are now very expensive including the once very cheap or free Bie-Bienko.I have this as pdf if you need it.All the best from Ireland Notafly (talk) 20:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Moulds (Molds) and their medicinal uses
Thanks for your recent message on my talk page. As you have an interest in fungi, I was wondering whether you might to look as Mold, Medicinal molds and Medicinal mushrooms. I have real concerns about these articles but am not sufficiently familiar with current taxonomy of fungi to make the first move. My concern is that "Mold" is not a precise term and appears to cover anything with hyphae and therefore overlap with "Medicinal mushrooms". This latter article presumably is intended to only cover species of Basidiomycota (even though they have hyphae) but it also seems to include within its purview what are elsewhere described as "Molds". All very confusing. My strong preference would be for an article Medicinal fungi in which a systematic view could be taken across the whole range of fungi. However, I may be totally off beam and would welcome the thoughts of others. Regards Velella Velella Talk 19:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
In response
Hi. In response to this comment [1]. If I pinged just one user of the 2 that participated in the discussion, others might think that I intentionally neglected to ping the other who disagreed with me; and revert my edit. It must be shown that I pinged both. 89.164.154.220 (talk) 22:50, 28 December 2018 (UTC)