Talk:PhpBB

List of other forum software

Is is appropriate to list other internet forum software in this article? The Internet forum article would seem to cover that already. -- Stevietheman 22:41, 19 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is necessary to list other forum software. This article is about phpBB, and the description of Internet forum links to the generic article about forum software. That is where the list is and should stay. GPHemsley 02:05, 31 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Quit it...

It's optimise, not optimize. Pit will have a fit if you change it again...

Wikipedia uses both British and American English spelling. Policy is to use whichever is used first in the article (ie that of the article creator). --Rory ☺ 13:23, Jun 12, 2004 (UTC)

Alright, forget it.... I plan on rewriting the "Future" section anyway. After that, we'll be using American English spelling throughout the entire article. I'm sure Pit knows and will follow the rules. GPHemsley 13:58, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Pit will be perfectly happy to rewrite the entire damn article as an excuse to spell it right, thanks.

phpBB is led by British teams, which makes a case for en_GB. [ alerante | “” 23:30, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC) ]

And as mentioned policy is to use author's version of english for spelling; I am the author and my version of english is en_GB :) Pti

Disregard this comment =

Talk page is screwed, trying to fix it.

Should we mention the security holes?

Today (December 12, 2004) theres been a pretty big and widespread attack on those still running old 2.0 versions, mainly 2.06 and 2.08. Is it worth mentioning this, as it has taken huge amounts of sites offline. Kiand 08:43, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I haven't really seen many other articles announce things like that. It's like talking about a larger scale phishing attack in the Internet Explorer or Firefox articles. Then again, maybe it should be here. I'm mainly editing this to remove the double heading :P. -[Unknown] 09:57, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)