User talk:Dude Master 2

Adding reference to Wikipedia articles

Hello Dude Master 2! Please do not forget to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Adding well-formatted references is easy.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite". Click on it.
Then click on "templates".
Choose the most appropriate template and then fill all relevant details.

This will add a well-formatted reference, which will allow other people to see where you got your information from. You can read more about this at Help:Edit toolbar, or watch this video: File:RefTools.ogv. Thanks and regards. —DBig Xrayᗙ 08:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

to use this message place {{subst:User:DBigXray/ref}} on User_talk

DBig Xrayᗙ 08:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to China–Pakistan Economic Corridor has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: China–Pakistan Economic Corridor was changed by Dude Master 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905095 on 2018-08-23T19:32:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on Asian Americans

As someone who edited Asian Americans in the past two weeks, I invite you to participate in a discussion about some recent edits. Specifically, there is a question about whether to include South Asian ethnicities in the discussion about Asian Americans. --Ishu (talk) 04:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm DBigXray. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Lashkar-e-Taiba seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 17:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Lashkar-e-Taiba. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 19:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to India–European Union relations, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "User fabricating statistics etc., no communication after many warnings - please block.". Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 00:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you ~~vandalize~~disrupt Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Indian passport. In this edit, you added a citation that says the number of passport holders is 65 million, yet you put the number in the article at 72 million. I have seen you do this same kind of "fudging" of numbers on many edits now. It is unacceptable to invent or "estimate" population and other statistics, they must be according to reliable sources. Please STOP, or you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia! IamNotU (talk) 23:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Scout MLG (talk) 12:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Scout MLG (talk) 12:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A comment about the above warnings, which are standard forms that use the word "vandalism". Wikipedia's definition of vandalism is editing that is malicious and intentionally damaging or defacing Wikipedia. I don't think that's what you have been doing. I do appreciate that you have honestly been trying to improve Wikipedia. Nevertheless, edits that add or change information without a reliable source, misrepresent reliable sources, or manufacture original research based on an editor's personal experience or opinions about what is correct, go against the core pillars of Wikipedia, verifiability and neutral point of view, and do damage Wikipedia. If this is done repeatedly, as seems to have been done here, here, and quite a number of other edits, it is considered disruptive editing, and will lead to the person being blocked from editing if they continue. Furthermore, all editors are expected to communicate when necessary, and failing to do so is also considered disruptive. It would be in your best interest to respond to the complaints from other editors here. You are welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, as long as your contributions meet the requirements of verifiability and other content policies. However, if you make any further edits that violate the above policies, without adequate explanation, you will be blocked. Thanks for your understanding. --IamNotU (talk) 15:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]