User talk:Bluebird207

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome!

Hello, Bluebird207, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! MickMacNee (talk) 14:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I also wanted to ask if you have any sources on the subject, books maybe? If so, I can show you how to format citations to further improve the article. Much of what I originally wrote in that article was cobbled together from memory and unreliable sources, so it could do with improving with proper sources, and I would be only too happy to help you if you have the info to hand. MickMacNee (talk) 14:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as it helps everyone to understand what is changed, such as when perusing the history of the page. Thanks, and happy editing. Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 03:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Egg

Nice tweak! PRRfan (talk) 22:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements to Prost JS45

Nice work. DH85868993 (talk) 01:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1993 Sauber engines

Hi Bluebird207. I have reverted the places where you changed "Sauber" to "Sauber-Ilmor" in the 1993 F1 race report articles. WP:F1 convention is that the engines were badged as "Sauber"s. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 09:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So Sauber actually badged the engines themselves, just as Arrows did with their Hart-built engines in 1998 and 1999? Now that I never knew up to now. Thanks for that, DH85868993. Bluebird207 (talk) 05:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Debunking a myth about skipped plates.

Remember when you disputed about certain plates being skipped? Well, my cousin has one the prefixs that the fansites claim were skipped. I've uploaded the picture of the sticker on Photobucket since I don't want to put a personal sticker on wikipedia. 2010 Toyota Camry, plate number FCC-4516 –BuickCentury Driver 12:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autovía LE-30

The article Autovía LE-30 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NEO#Roadways as a local road without major coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ansh666 00:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it myself - it was a bit of trigger-happiness. Tagging instead. Sorry! Ansh666 00:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route E1

Why does it need to be stated that's it's a ex First bus? This is not a bus enthusiast site, the H in Alexander Dennis EnviroE400H stands for hybrid so there no reason to say it's a hybrid. The reason why it says Alexander Dennis Enviro400 double-deckers is to point out that they are double deckers. CourtneyBonnick (talk) 02:18, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To stop any edit wars I restored some things on the London Buses route E1 page. CourtneyBonnick (talk) 05:33, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

what was wrong with saying "In the spring of 2013, First decided to sell its London bus businesses, and on 22 June of that year the E1, along with the Enviro400s and Greenford garage, passed to Metroline"?

Needed to specify month.

No it wasn't all bus enthusiast speak. CourtneyBonnick (talk) 15:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of South Park episodes

WP:OVERLINK says do not link the names of major geographic features and locations so it's completely irrelevant whether the IP knew about WP:OVERLINK when he/she removed the link. Nor is it relevant that the link had been present for 3 years. Errors creep into articles and can be overlooked for years; I've personally fixed errors that have existed since 2006. I really don't understand what you're disagreeing with. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I should explain here.

When I saw that 77.97.214.147 had removed the link without giving an explanation, I genuinely believed that this was an act of vandalism, given many of the other edits that he/she had made. And that's why I restored the link.

When you re-removed the link (so to speak), I have to admit that I was a bit thrown by the wording of your explanation, for several reasons: the link had been present for so long; I was not the person who had originally added it; and - to be perfectly honest - I hadn't, and still haven't, got my head around all of the rules as regards linking, even after six years of being a Wikipedian. These in addition to my belief as regards the nature of 77.97.214.147's edit. And that's probably why I said, "I have to disagree".

But now that you've made it clear that it was an error, and that errors can be overlooked for even longer than three years, I don't disagree at all. And I'm willing to admit, too, that on this occasion 77.97.214.147 was actually right - even if, as seems likely, he/she didn't realise it.

I shall remove the link once and for all. And I apologise if I've wasted your time.

Thanks and regards, Bluebird207 (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Summaries

Thanks for your notion, but I am not quite sure how to put summaries :-/ I am new to wiki & just learning the procedure. But I can't help updating if there's some missing information's has been given in. Thanks for understanding.

Ashhab1323 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashhab1323 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's very easy - all you have to do is put your summary into the text box that has "Edit summary" above it. Your summary cannot be longer than 250 characters, however.

Also, don't forget to preview your changes by clicking the "Show preview" button. Then, if you see that you have made mistakes or have forgotten to put things in, you can make the desired corrections, and then click the "Save page" button - thus saving you from having to make multiple edits all at once.

Thanks and regards, Bluebird207 (talk) 22:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

188.31.7.154's talk page

Hi, I noticed that you recently reverted the IP's edit(s) on thei talk page. Per WP:REMOVED, "Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of material from a user page is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents. There is no need to keep them on display and usually users should not be forced to do so.". Per WP:OWNTALK, "Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. Users may also remove some conten". There was no reason to edit war for restoring the warnings when the IP didn't want to keep them. Please keep this in mind next time. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 18:32, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. It was just the heat of the moment. Bluebird207 (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Irresponsible user: Mithil Amin

User (Mithil Amin) has been infiltrating with false information's in various Bangladesh Sports wiki pages. How do I block him? He's totally out of control. :-/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashhab1323 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've just undone some of his revisions.

If he keeps at it, I will warn him myself. And if that doesn't stop him, then I will take the matter further.

I should say, however, that I'm not an administrator. Bluebird207 (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Knoxville, Tennessee, US vandal

Hi Bluebird! I understand your frustrations with this guy. Short story, it's an IP-hopping editor who is clearly a vandal. In my experience, when you notice editors using the name of the article as their edit summary, that's often a tip-off that they're trying to escape scrutiny, perhaps from the anti-vandal bots, or that otherwise they're only here to disrupt. What would be helpful, I think, (if you were so inclined) would be if you could place some indication in your edit summary of where the disruptive user is coming from like I do in this edit where I write, "Unsourced. Tag: Knoxville, Tennessee, US; ISP: AT&T" You don't have to be that formal or complete, but even if you were to say, "Disruptive and questionable content from AA city in BB state, USA" or whatever, it would make it easier for other editors to ask for page protection, because we could just point to the edit history and say, "Page needs semi-protection, please note the IP hopping from Knoxville over the last month." The quick way to figure out where an IP is located is to go to their contributions page and click "Geolocate" at the bottom. In this case you'd be taken here. If you're not game for that, I understand, it just means more typing and clicking and this is a volunteer position. Regards, and thanks for being alert! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Cyphoidbomb.

And thanks for your advice - I'll bear it in mind in the future.

Regards, Bluebird207 (talk) 11:35, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of dead links

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dead_link according to the dead link article "Avoid using this template when the reference is fully adequate without the link. In this case, simply remove the link." The style recommendation is that dead links should be removed. QuentinUK (talk) 08:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dead link also says, "It is often useful to make a search for an archive copy of the dead link".

I've done just that, and found copies of the two dead links from Fleetdata.co.uk.

Next time you encounter a dead link in a reference, I think you should search for an archive copy first, before you consider removing part or all of the reference altogether. The Internet Archive Wayback Machine is good for making such searches.

Regards, Bluebird207 (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that looks like a useful archiving website. QuentinUK (talk) 09:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing links to redirects

Hi Bluebird207. In edits like this one, does some tool fix the links to redirects, or do you make those changes manually? Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 10:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I make them manually. Bluebird207 (talk) 16:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 08:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi! I'm not sure if your aware, but Wikipedia has policies in place regarding what can and can't be used to source an article. Everything you need is at WP:RS. In short, self published personal websites are not considered to be a reliable source for articles. Please find a reliable source for that claim rather than introducing unreliable sources. Thanks! Jeni ^(talk) 21:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have now re-used one of the archived sources on Vehicle registration plates of the United Kingdom, Crown dependencies and overseas territories - which also mentions the big registration re-organisation as taking place in October 1974, and codes like CF being transferred to new areas at the same time.

And I'm pretty sure that the site from which this archived source comes from was not a self-published personal website - it was the site of the Road Transport Fleet Data Society, based in Biggleswade.

Hope the issue is now cleared up.

Regards, Bluebird207 (talk) 22:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio License Plates page

I noticed your revision to the recent page (12-16-15). From my review of the page it appears that Ohio is issuing about 11,000 different plates per month. I am trying to time this because I am looking for a plate fairly low in the GYM XXXX series. The Ohio BMV has no idea when the plates will be issued and I have been calling them about every two months to see how far along they are in issuing the series.

Do you have a formula for guessing when the GYM XXXX series may be issued? I am guessing February or March of 2017. Is that reasonable in your estimation?

Thanks! JM8719 (talk) 22:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TBH, I'm not sure I could guess when the GYM series will be issued.

Don't forget, the serials are allocated in blocks to each county. It's very possible for one county to start issuing the serials from a higher block while other counties are still issuing the serials from lower blocks.

Regards, Bluebird207 (talk) 23:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am aware of that. Some of the larger counties go through plates much faster than the small ones. Some larger counties have numerous sales outlets with various series available at the same time. I call the BMV occasionally and they are helpful by telling me what is being issued and where its being sold. I just do not want to bother them too much. I realize timing this will be difficult and fun.

Thanks for your reply. Regards and Happy Holidays. JM8719 (talk) 22:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket ranking tables

Hi Bluebird207. Thanks for your message to me about the cricket rankings tables. I wasn't aware of the discussion, and have been happy to make a contribution to it. Mmitchell10 (talk) 21:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Mmitchell10. :) Bluebird207 (talk) 22:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work to the "Vehicle Registration Plates of ..." series of pages. Keep up the excellent work! Garchy (talk) 16:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also hoping to see you come back soon! Garchy (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Belated thanks, Garchy. :) Bluebird207 (talk) 22:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Keep it up while you're doing a good job of pointing out old bases' maximum issues of each U.S. states and Canadian provinces! If you got that job 100% done as i'll promise i give you a Tireless Contributor star. Otherwise thank you for your job! SMB99thx XD (contribs) 22:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's your third Original Barnstar you have got, and i have awarded you this barnstar after the second one in less than eight years.--SMB99thx XD (contribs) 23:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Current License plate sequence

How do you determine the current license plate sequence for a specific state e.g. Texas, Georgia? Sarge363 (talk) 22:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By visiting this site, mainly. Bluebird207 (talk) 22:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That site's data has been largely unavailable for the last couple of years. What are the other sources that you're using? Royce (talk) 05:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also use the Plate Shack's Y2K page and, occasionally, allaboutlicenseplates.com.

It would be nice if LicensePlates.cc's detail pages returned sooner than later - but I accept that the owners have other commitments. Bluebird207 (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1983 Canadian Grand Prix

Thanks for fixing my error in 1983 Canadian Grand Prix (i.e. stating that Prost finished second instead of Cheever). I mistakenly looked at the qualifying table instead of the race result! Thanks again. DH85868993 (talk) 00:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, DH. :) Bluebird207 (talk) 00:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

F1 race report tidying

Hi Bluebird207. Just a quick note to say thanks for the great work you are doing tidying up the F1 race reports. A lot of rubbish has crept in over the years... Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 01:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome again, DH. Yeah, bits of redundant trivia and blatant F1 fan speak... I've taken the step of adding a few of these articles to my watchlist.

Regards, Bluebird207 (talk) 01:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vehicle registration plates of New York

Bad grammar aside, was there an "I" series? and if not, then why not state that? Useddenim (talk) 00:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No 'I' series. HZZ-9999 was followed by JAA-1000 and up.

Perhaps I should make it clear that I, O and Q are not used in the ABC-1234 serial format. Bluebird207 (talk) 01:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a hunch...

P.S. Vehicle registration plates of New York now has indefinite Pending-changes protection. Useddenim (talk) 16:04, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, that clarification I made did *not* stop that Australian IP hopper from re-adding that particular bit of information.

It really does seem to me at this stage that *nothing* will make him/her change his/her ways. (S)he could be repeatedly warned and blocked; all the suggestions in the world could be made to him/her; clarifications could be made in the articles concerned that make his/her edits completely redundant and unnecessary - and yet (s)he will *still* go on making these edits, seldom giving summaries for them (and almost never giving *proper* summaries), and all the time hopping between IP addresses in several ranges (103.101.168.xx, 103.101.171.xx, etc.) instead of availing of the benefits of creating a proper account.

Whether it's out of inability or refusal to see the errors of his/her ways and to learn from them, or just unbelievable carelessness, I don't know. But it disappoints me greatly - as has every other situation I've come across in my nearly ten years on Wikipedia in which a person has persisted in making unnecessary edits (vandalism, addition of trivia/redundant info, etc.), not making proper use of the edit summary box, and hopping between IPs - even after being punished for it in some way.

And it disappoints me, too, that as long as Wikipedia continues to exist these people will *always* be around - just as there will always be people on Facebook and Twitter frequently making unacceptably silly posts/tweets for no good reason and with no need to. (Probably not the fairest comparison in the world, but you get what I mean.)

This isn't the only reason why I have decided to retire from editing Wikipedia - but it's the main one. Along with other things, it *has* affected my enjoyment of editing to the point where I no longer enjoy it as much as I should. By no means has this been an easy decision to make, especially after so many years of editing - but it *is* a good thing to know when to stop, and it *is* a good time to stop when the fun stops.

I *will* take my leave with *some* good memories of it all, though.

Bluebird207 (talk) 23:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]