Jump to content

User talk:Chewings72/Archive 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 04:52, 2 January 2019 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) from User talk:Chewings72) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive 10Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20

Wikidata weekly summary #339

22:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Reverts

Hi. I noticed you have reverted some edits of Happyturkeyday (talk), marking your reverts as minor edits, as if you were reverting vandalism. I think this is inappropriate because it doesn't look like the reverted edits are vandalism but rather disputed edits. I think you should post proper edit summaries and discuss the reverts in the talk page. Thinker78 (talk) 06:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Thinker78 I have rollback rights. As you may be aware, this enables me to revert vandalism and test edits with just one click. The rollback routine automatically puts in that it is a "minor" edit (for reasons that are unclear to me and which it seems that I cannot change). If you look at Happyturkeyday's talk page you will see that he has been warned by another user, Kpgjhpjm, not to make the changes he has made to a number of Romanov royalty related articles. You will also see by looking at my overall contributions to Wikipedia over a number of years that I try and provide clear explanations for my non-rollback edits and changes. Regards --Chewings72 (talk) 06:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
But what is your rationale of thinking the aforementioned edits of Happyturkeyday are vandalism/tests? Because they were done in more than one page? Their changes have some historical basis if I'm not mistaken and they provided a reasonable explanation in at least one edit summary in the article Nicholas II of Russia, which seems to prove that they are not vandalizing/testing and were made in good faith. The other editor did warn them but in my opinion unduly, not only because, I believe, the edits are not unconstructive/vandalism/tests, but also because the editor is new. Thinker78 (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Thinker78 surtsicna Based on your logic,Happyturkeyday should then put in the full title: "By the Grace of God, We Nicholas, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias, of Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod etc. etc." If you look at each of the Wikipedia articles relating to the Romanov dynasty since Peter the Great, there seems to have been a consensus for some time to keep the title simple. For whatever reason,Happyturkeyday wished to put in the longer title (or, more correctly, a subset of the longer title) without any consultation with the Wikipedia community. The user managed to change numerous articles covering members of the Romanov family in the same or similar manner. I have copied in user: surtsicna given that user's lengthy ongoing interest in European history including Russian history. I note that Happyturkeyday reverted my reverts. So, given your concerns, I will gracefully and politely retreat from making any reversions to changes by Happyturkeyday. Chewings72 (talk) 09:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
WP:BOLD. And, again, they are a new editor. Thinker78 (talk) 23:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #340

The Signpost: 1 December 2018