Talk:Pong
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pong article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Pong" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 18 months |
Pong has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 29, 2008, November 29, 2012, and November 29, 2014. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 29, 2018. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 555 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Another example of Pongs cultural effect.
I found this short film on YouTube, and it is a perfect demonstration of just how iconic pong has become.
The New Politics by Joshua Wong (2005)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB1Zy7nA_Hc
Graham1973 (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Release date
Why does the infobox say the game was released on 29 November 1972? The article itself only says that they began advertising the game at that point, while no actual release date was provided. Researcher Michael D. Current quotes the WSJ on a December release date. 93.159.251.2 (talk) 10:20, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Geartooth: Please read this section before reverting, thanks. 2A02:908:1019:4820:9820:EBF6:4F54:C327 (talk) 11:19, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Could you perhaps provide a direct reference to the WSJ article in question? Lordtobi (✉) 11:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- For now, I've directly used the Current source for the December date. Nontheless, it'd be better if we had the WSJ source directly. I fear like this might be difficult to do, as that article is supposedly from 1974. Lordtobi (✉) 11:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)