Talk:Football365

It would be useful toward establishing that this site is notable and encyclopedic to show at least one external reference (someone that has written about the web site, like a sports magazine, BBC, etc). Also, my feeling is that an article that only repeats what is easily determined from the web site itself does not have much value here. What else can you tell us? (who founded it, has it been involved in any scandals or controversies) Someone coming to an encylopedia to look up the site won't be served if the article merely describes what is on the site--they could see that with their own eyes. Thatcher131 (talk) 20:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically it needs references not to itself. Thatcher131 (talk) 20:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to the nme forum claiming it invented the frosties kid is dead rumour, here is a link from the forum where one of the forummers acknowledge that was indeed invented by someone (Joe 2.0) from the the f365 forum

6 posts down.

http://www.nme.com/boards/showthread.php?t=40204&page=5

The page just serves a self-promotion. Delete it.

No, the website is notable enough, and is used, for example, by the Orange mobile phone company. If it needs to be changed from a self-promotion in your view, add the {{advert} tag

The website, considering the traffic it receives and the sway its online community holds, is no less worthy of an article than other websites listed on Wikipedia.

Why has the forum influencing polls section been removed?

The forum did influence the Brazil vs Croatia game. This is a verifyable fact and I assumed a re-wording of the piece would be acceptable. If you need to revert sections of text you need to explain why in the discussion page.