User talk:Anville
You're wrong. I'm right.
And that won't change, not even if we fight!
—Mary Prankster, "Tell Your Friends (Part Deux)"
Anville
|
.svg){kind=logo}
 Archives |
|---|
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 11:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Qu'est-ce que c'est?
OK, I am technically not an active contributor here anymore, but this e-mail I just received is so memorable I couldn't just let it languish in my GMail account. I guess now I can go about my business elsewhere on the Interblag knowing that my work here has been appreciated. :-/ Anville 19:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
NEVER HEARD ABOUT PRIVACY RIGHTS?
HEY DUDE! I wanted to reach you first but you are gone from wiki, so that will be ze Miguel, but none te less I think you have to clean your path after you as you have been mentioning my first name like if I had made a secret of it, as if anselm was you real name for exemple, would you like me to name you with picture and your private phone and cell phone number? LOL! hahaha it is soooo funny dont you think? I am sure you will found it as intelligent and very subtile as when you did so with my name on wikipedia PUBLIC and OFFICIAL web site, you moron! never heard of google and search engine nor of privacy rights?!! Well thats about time you did dude! Yes, I am very angry at your laissez aller et laisser faire! [To help you correct errors, shaekespear never put the words et tu brute in the mouth of Caesar as it means absolutly nothing "et" signifying "and" giving the meaning: and you brute?... the word being es tu brute? meaning "are you a brutal man?".] that was just a paranthése, to show you that hiérophantasia should have an end, yes, even at wikipedia, and even in the lounge of admi.
- Actually, I believe Plutarch put those words in Caesar's mouth; Shakespeare used North's translation of Plutarch's Parallel Lives for his historical plays set in the Roman era. I'm not sure how one can claim that "Et tu, Brute" means "absolutly [sic] nothing" in one sentence and "are you a brutal man?" in the next (neither of which are accurate statements, of course). But I digress. Anville 19:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
I want to tell that I begin on wiki in 2005 and that I was first unregistered as unknowing the system and had just a user number to begin with. Quiet usual. Then I took a pseudo as most foxes do, and wrote on wiki under that name, having very clearly and several times on that same article underlined that I was the same person as the one writting under the previous user number. Nothing wrong either on that one.
BUt but but, you and some idiotic fox from enclosed wiki board are accusing me of being a socket puppet for other idiots like yourself, and for trying to hide me under that user number.
Er! here, what the heck do you think you are doing. Oh sorry, I forgot it was easy to partake foxes bodies once they cant talk. That explain. Or so little. For your knowledge, or what is left of it, I was the one who most strongly asked for the arbcom to look at this bogda affair, and I was the one who contacted all kind of wiki control instances to have them put some order in the mes that was happening there at that time. since sept. 2005.
So you know it.
Nonetheless I was bloqued before the arb com had begin which nobody can ever justify.
And now to the point: everybody on wiki is aloud to preserve its own identity private in order to protect oneself from personal attacks, and this rule has been enfringed by ALL adminsitrators on wikipedia with my name!!! It is not because you have access to my private data that this gives you the rights to abuse of that facts and to reveal my identity to the world, as it will be later seen as a links in all GOOGLE, which has also been abused by YBM and co who have made a guirlande of links with my full name on it and quiet sarcastics (at best) and very insulting (as most) texts who can all be seen on the net when my name is computed in google.
To add to that, diverse active administrators at that time, loke this bishonen have used my FULL name and aftername when mentioning me instead of the pseudo used by me on wikipedia as it is always done usually, when talking in private wiki forum between other administrators of wikipedia and other internal chat room on wiki.
Those texts, very damaging and insultings, are also on google under my name.. And those text also ended up, god knows how and why, in a private web site created more than 9 months after those exchanges took place, and were my name with insults figure... at the front webside..(?) I do not know the woman who made that site and contacted them to have them remove that and to know why my name figured there, but was never answered.
Instead my mail to them was in the list at google...
So all that to tell you that since I was on wikipedia my name has become a hit at google, and I would like to ask you why, and how this is possible, and since when wikipedia was ment to be a forum to disgrace people and put them in the most public forum, like google, with shit all over their head. I have in fact lost 3 job interviews because of that as my employer looked at google and didnt like what he saw there. ´Basically that I say lots of rant and rant and rant. (must be the alone vocabulary wiki admi know about, since it is the alone one they use when short for real argumentation, could make some new words, I mean this is an encyclopedia, no?)
Since you like to program, so deleete all entries with my name on it related far or close to wikipidia, wiki admi intern talks in chat rooms of wiki, or related to wikipedia, and links coming from wiki users involved in the bogda affair. I have came back a short time to write about a topic COMPLETELY unrelated to the bogda, but nonetheless some admi found very amusing to blend in it (probably bored by each others small talks on the main bogda site) and to block me just for fun.
Also acusations by you that I came back using my user number are false as I couldnt get my pseudo back. As simpel as that. I was able to do so later on, using the help of an admi I had contacted regarding that. So I found those comments of yours on the bogda talk page completely unrelated and frivole and an obvious personal harrassement, which is in fact the specialty of most administrators in wikipedia, from my own experience: to harrass any they dont agree wiht or dont understand or to do so just for fun and to get some extra ban stars or just to feel they have. indeed, some power in life. And no, I didn't like it.
Another point is that I very clearly remembered to have been blocked 3 days for making remarcs, banal, but who were not 100% related to the topic, but more personal, as adressing another user, very friendly, when the discussion was running about august sept 2005. I also remember that it was Bishonen who did that. But when I see the kind of discussions you and your fellows are having now, and how private chit chat that is, and even "how was your hollydays?" so that this place ressemble more and more to a private chat room for admi en mal de compagnie, I ask myself if rules are only made to harrass users as please, or if admi are just enjoying diplomates imunity here.
I thought wiki was for all to write about a subject and not just for admi not knowing a thing about it to put their grant of salt.
You liked to think you are some kind of Hierophantes, knowing all about all, and able to say it all, but just take a look at your biaised point of view -and not fact- in this exemple: bogda brothers where accused of having got the lawest degree with mention honorable (misused by diverse fox thinking that the english wont get it) but at the end it was proven that the law in vigor at that time, show that the mention was very good indeed. And the main text, article was about to be changed in that regard, when suddendly, Rialuezo appear and PRETEND that the law is "doesnt matter" what matters is what the fox says and they says "i contacted him my self" that this mention is law.
Which is a lie. the guy never checked with the PHD correctors, and what he say cant be taken at face value seen with the past he has and his animosity towards the bogdanov combined with his personal friendship with YBM.
But nonetheless it was taken at face value and used to rechange the text to its negativ expression of the meaning of those mentions.
Incredible what some will found to deny other to be with them...
Rialuezo is a full member of a sect, so you know it, that count 5 scientifics, all in physic, out of the 6 scientifics mentioned at the end of the article about the bogdanov...(((-:!!
This sect is represented by a man that you will found if you just tast the title of the bogda book in google, "before the big bang" and is the reason why their book couldnt be translated in english and sold in the US because this guy opposes it, and was supported by...the people, the very same, who have fight against the bogda on wikipedia and supported every thing with prooves and articles. All articles you have agains the bogda thesis is issued from articles and texts and blogs and scientific papers written by one of those scientific. Interesting dont you think? Surprisingly hilarious I will say! All those things called science... The man in question clame to have written the book already, but with a different and not so scientifical content. The symbol of his sect are delphins.
Please take the time to fold over his web site and get the surprise of your life with Rialuezo and Baez swimming there with Woit (!!!). I say no more just go and see. I tried in due time to get the attention of wiki users and admi about this discrepency, but it was waist of time. You all call my stoff rant because unable to understand and maybe too too leasy to check your sources and mine on your own. With the consequences that we now know.
I dont personally give a shit about the story, but I do care about having my name blended with all kind of schmug insulting me, and this all over google. So remove my name, both forname and aftername from wiki, As I wish nothing else but to have absolutly nothing to do with that very disappointing place, who could use some lesson in objectivity, and objective reasonement. You are in robotic, as I am, and programing as me, we aint in the same boat, but use your know how to deleete all my entries from wiki using my full name. I am NOT interested in being spotted in that kind of light, I have other things to do and no need to loose a job as chief operator at >Siemens, nor as a project manager in robotic and polymæric sensors research, for reasons who are as stupid as being named by uncarefull, or directly and voluntaraly, mean administrators. That will be it and merry christmas. Be nice enough to send me an email with info as when you are planning to launch the deleete session and in which extend you can do so.
I am really tired of this story and since I do not have been on this discussion fog since 13 months I would like to know what can push you into being so sarcastic towards me with debilitate remarcks and very prjoratives all full with prejudices.
For you to know: I had never heard in my life about the bogdanovs before the 15 of august 2005, and did not heard of them since nov.-dec. 2005. Which mean less than 4 months of knowledge about hem, which is much lesser than you and all other admi who entered the subject after i had been banned... LOL!!! I am in the field of theoretical physic, and have written a book about this theory but in bigger if i might put it that way. I'll send you a little word as soon as it will be out. In the mean time help doing the cleaning after you and your fellow administrators, as I do not like this kind of intrusion in my private sphére.
My reason to be in this Bogdanovs affair? To speak french. I hadn't done so in over 20 years so I was missing it, and it was also my first try at chat room, never interested usually. But the all thing ended up in the wiki english, too bad...)-: With all the consequences we now know. Not so friendly the french, when I think of it.. Not very good return to my origins. A completely missed come back!
So goodbye and dont even think at provocating me I am completely boiling with this story of link on my name at google. Here is my email that I hope will not end up in some unrelated topics pages...we never know. [e-mail address removed — Anville 19:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)] I was previously careless about that kind of things in the past, but since those messy interviews at Siemens because of those shitty links on google about my involvement in wikipedia I aint so please. None of them are related to the talk page or article, only private assessement about me and what they think of me personnally, made by some very uncarefull administrators using my real name and using it fully.. Which is quiet unseen, as far as I am concern they usualy use foxes pseudonyme when refering to anyone on a topic. You should begin on wiki to strengen that policy of yours regarding private informations on users.
Sophie P, pseudo: "XAL", user nbr: do not remmeber it.
Try to contact me as soon as possible on this precedent, as it must be solved very fast. I tried to contact webadministrators without results, as I do not know how to proceed.
Thanks for doing something pointing in the right direction.