Talk:UBlock Origin
This page is not a forum for general discussion about UBlock Origin. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about UBlock Origin at the Reference desk. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Rename page to uBlock Origin
What about renaming/moving the page under the uBlock Origin name, and make current uBlock page to redict there? Development of the uBlock has been stalled, and it's usage is marginal compared to uBlock Origin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.192.199.145 (talk) 23:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 11 March 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed request. Number 57 16:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
UBlock → UBlock Origin – Suggested on the talk page, and I agree with the suggestion — the app has been renamed uBlock Origin, and the fork that retained the name uBlock is marginally relevant at best. Goldenshimmer (talk) 20:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Chrome Extension weirdness???
Now Chrome Store says uBlock Origin is maintained by gorhill, not Ray. Is that correct?97.123.148.181 (talk) 14:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- @User:97.123.148.181: They are two different names for the same person. Goldenshimmer (talk) 22:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC) (forgot to sign this when I wrote it)
Proposed uBlock.org prunning
The site has been without a valid cert for over a week. The extension hasn't been updated for nearly a year. Considering removing most of the ublock.org info except as a footnote in the history of uBlock Origin. Any thoughts? Kintpuash (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Is this better at evading detection?
I need a better ad-blocker that isn't detected by sites, which is why I want this. Here's a couple sites for example, that can detect adblock, can this evade it (and block the ads) The snare (talk) 02:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
1.http://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/business/T057-S001-7-things-that-will-soon-disappear/index.html\ 2.http://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=http://www.forbes.com/&refURL=https://www.google.com/&referrer=https://www.google.com/
- Wikipedia is not a blog. Rewrite or remove. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 10:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
It's not supposed to be, it's for discussion- to see if anyone knows and can add it to the article, how it compares to other blockers.The snare (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Needs mention of third-party filters to allow firewall access to
e.g., malwaredomains.com
malwaredomains.com and similar deserve an article on Wikipedia, if they don't have one already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocdcntx (talk • contribs)
Move version history to own page
How about creating own page for the version history? That long version history table just adds clutter to the article. Just leave couple of notable changes to the article, and move rest to own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.23.112.148 (talk) 12:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure we need it at all, see WP:NOTCHANGELOG. - Ahunt (talk) 15:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
What is the revenue model?
What funds the development of this and uMatrix plugins? 59.92.59.0 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- As the article states "The project specifically refuses donations." And the ref cited says "Free. Open source. For users by users. No donations sought." There is no funding at all, it is all done as a hobby. - Ahunt (talk) 20:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- The same amount paid to most Wikipedia editors, zero. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 23:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- C-Class Quebec articles
- Low-importance Quebec articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- All Software articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Mid-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Mid-importance
- All Websites articles
- C-Class Free and open-source software articles
- High-importance Free and open-source software articles
- C-Class Free and open-source software articles of High-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors