User:Njk47/sandbox
 | This is a user sandbox of Njk47. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Article Evaluation for George (novel)
Despite its lack of content, what does exist in this meager article are relevant details regarding the novel and a structured framework that should allow for a more in-depth writing. However, with this potential for improved quality comes the outdated review of George , as it seems it has not been edited since early 2016. Furthermore, although the framework is certainly in place for an excellent article, the author(s) failed to build out the individual sections, leaving us with a meager view of what could be a more informative piece.
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? What else could be improved?
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?