User:Yasminekhiri/sandbox

''Article evaluation''

For the article about 'William Milnor Roberts' I think that the name of his Professor Joseph Roberts was not relevant to the topic. The amount of reports he wrote distracted me, there are so many of them but unfortunately some don't have citations or sources on them. His reports and work should be described more. And his major achievements should be mentioned. The article is pretty neutral, there are no viewpoints overrepresented or underrepresented. On the references part, four out of six links don't work, the third link doesn't give any information about William Milnor Roberts but his second wife's name. It is not a very reliable source. The fifth link in the references takes us to an article in Archives West which provides access to descriptions of primary sources in the western United states, including diaries, correspondance and photographs. On the Bibliography the links don't work. In the External links section I can only find 4 reports, but I can see more than 7 of his works not cited.

The talk page contain four comments that say that either the article didn't have citations, reliable sources or that it didn't have enough information about the subject, the comments are recommendations for edits about the article. It is rated start-class, mid-importance, low-importance). It is also a part of four different wikiprojects such as: wikiproject Pennsylvania, Wikiprojects train, Wikiprojects biography and Wikiproject Philadelphia. Wikipedia discusses the topic differently from class by talking about family, career etc... and it provides citations and sources.

Wellington Article:

After reading the Wellington article I find it relevant to the topic. The amount of information about this city (Wellington) distracted me. The article is neutral it does not appear biased toward any particular position. The article is very objective there are no viewpoints are neither overrepresented nor underrepresented. Most of the links and citations on this article don't work which means that we do not have reliable sources therefore the information is not really valid. Some of the links that work are unreliable sources because they are newspapers, and surveys. Newspapers are written by the media and therefore they are not always objective. Surveys are out of date. The sources are not neutral. We could add more citations and sources. In the talk page we can see people commenting about the pictures in the article and the confusion between the city of Wellington and Wellington City. Some people suggested to add the name of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington. And others declared that the urban area had no mayor. The article is rated B,C-class, it is a part of Wikiproject Newzealand and Wikiproject cities.

Grant,Alabama:

The article is relevant to the topic. It is a very short article with few information. The article is neutral but the last part of it (Demographics) is very detailed about the race and ethnicities of people who live there. The article is objective. Out of seven citations, only three of them work. We need to add more reliable sources. The last census of population and housing done by the United states census was done in 2010, which makes the data out of date. There are no comments on the talk page, the article is rated a start-class, low-importance. It is a part of wikiproject Alabama and wikiproject cities.

Lounsberry, New York:

The article is relevant to the topic. It only has 2 paragraphs. The article is neutral, two citations are not working. The links says error 404 not found. We can add a geography sub heading and put the coordinates over there. We don't have really any information on the subject.