Talk:Ice trade
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Ice trade has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
Untitled
Excellent article! Bravo! Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- If someone is inclined to act on the feedback, yes, but I'll admit that I haven't got the time to do so at the moment. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
@User:Hchc2009 Do you think more people are now going to get involved in the peer review process? Lbertolotti (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- I've got a bit more time now, although I don't have any personal intention to take it beyond GA. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
The article begins with "Ice trade started in 1806" and then explains how it had actually been in place for centuries (millenia?) before that. If you want to say that **large scale** ice trade began in 1806 maybe it could be defended (although there is always the detail of properly defining what "large scale" means), but as it is seems rather confusing at best and partial and worst... Needs proper edition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.39.140.199 (talk) 20:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- GA-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- GA-Class history articles
- Low-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- GA-Class Transport articles
- Low-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class Norway articles
- Unknown-importance Norway articles
- WikiProject Norway articles
- GA-Class Trade articles
- Low-importance Trade articles
- WikiProject Trade articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles