User talk:Ravensfire

I will generally respond on this page inside the section which has been added unless you request otherwise. Please watch this page if you leave me a message, and remember to sign your post with ~~~~. Thanks!

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome!

Welcome message!

Hello, Ravensfire! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Levine2112 discuss 04:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

My activity of removing that section is in compliance with Wikipedia's NPOV policy

Sir, Wikipedia's NPOV policy abstains someone from APPRECIATING a subject. On the other hand, CRITICISM is also strictly prohibited. I can also create an Appreciation segment for Anu Malik, and can appreciate him by citing online sources, BUT that would again be non-neutral act. It seems that you don't have sufficient information about the person on which this edit is being made, and if you would see the section which i am trying to remove, you would observe that the mentioned edit is a part of criticism of Anu Malik(Whose haters are large in numbers). And as far as my constructive contribution is concerned, i allot 1 hour daily to Wikipedia for contributing to the pages on which information are insufficient or incorrect. I certainly believe that the discussed section should soon be removed without any extra altercation. I will have no issue if this matter is dragged to arbitration committee. Take care, have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkupad (talk • contribs) 08:00, December 31, 2018 (UTC)

Well it certainly was in compliance with white-washing. In compliance with NPOV? Not so much. Ravensfire (talk) 14:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Sarkar (soundtrack)

Hi Ravens,

Wish you a very Happy New Year 2019.

It is seen that you have been looking after/improving/assisting for content on the page Sarkar (soundtrack). I can dissect each section and let me explain as to why this page requires a speedy deletion. I had uploaded the A9 tag quite before but was removed by Bbb23. If you can involve discussion with other users on the talk page of the soundtrack it would be great. I'm summarizing the same. Arjann (talk)

The A9 speedy deletion tag has some pretty strict criteria on when it should be used and the bar for declining it when used is pretty low. Here, the article saying it is the soundtrack for a film really is enough to meet that low level. It's a claim, regardless of it being right or wrong, of importance. In addition, several of the artists have linked articles which also is enough to block the use of A9. Should this article be deleted / merged back into the main film article, I certainly believe so, but it needs to go through the AFD process. I'm doing that here, created by the same editor as the Sarkar soundtrack article. My thought is to use that as guidance for Sarkar. I personally don't believe that a soundtrack that doesn't get much notice beyond that its a soundtrack for the film should be split out. If it wins awards, bing! Gets significant notice on it's own, bing! But just the usual stuff - reviews, puff pieces, etc, that's all tied to the film. Ravensfire (talk) 22:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank You

Hello, I am glad that you reviewed the article created by me, i had believed that Mishika Chourasia meets the notability Criteria to qualify an article, but thank you so much for making me understand in brief, You are one of the very first admin i met who helps the newbie like me, I just keep trying to make wikipedia an up-to-date platform which i will keep doing and learning as well, please bare me and keep correcting me on my mistakes, thats how i will learn. Wish you have a great day ahead Sir 😇😇❤❤Shringhringshring (talk) 04:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Ravensfire Would You Please Help Us?

Hi, I would like to ask why our namesbiography.com is added to the spam list: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Spam_blacklist

I don't know who spammed this site please help us and remove it from the list because we have a lot of competitors some from them maybe someone has spammed it on Wikipedia article and that's why our site is added in the Wikipedia spam blacklist.

Please help us and removed it from Wikipedia spam blacklist.

I hope you understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namesbiography (talk • contribs) 09:00, January 16, 2019 (UTC)

@Namesbiography: That's easy - because you are spamming it and using URL shorteners to get around the spam list. You are using multiple users, switching as they get blocked. Wikipedia is not here to promote your site. Please just stop. Also, this is a block on Meta, meaning you're spamming across mutliple Wikipedia sites. You need to discuss this over there, not here. Ravensfire (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Ravensfire,

We were not spamming that may be done by our competitors may so they spammed it on Wikipedia articles please Ravensfire try to understand and Please remove it from the spam list. : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Spam_blacklist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namesbiography (talk • contribs) 04:55, January 17, 2019 (UTC)

@Namesbiography: Here's the problem, your site has been spammed of late to multiple articles by multiple user ids and ip addresses. That is absolutely not in doubt here. We don't know if the person / people spamming are trying to promote your site or are are trying to run a joe-job on your site. I'm a regular editor, so it's outright impossible for me to determine. Even for a checkuser (someone with enhanced permissions), it's very difficult at best to make this determination. There's a SPI created here asking for a checkuser to take a look and see if they can offer any suggestions. That said, the circumstances here are very suspicious.This is a brand-new site that clearly doesn't meet the reliable source criteria for Wikipedia. It's quite rare for someone from the domain to notice when they are put on the blacklist if there isn't a campaign from that domain to add links to Wikipedia. Overall, I'm not seeing how allowing links to your site benefits Wikipedia. It is NOT a reliable source, so it should not be used in any article to source anything. Sorry, that's just the reality. I hope you go swimming and ocean water fillis you lungs and you move on to the great beyoned. Ravensfire (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Lil champs image

Thanks for your kind cooperation and support I have updated the reliable source and tell me is this good or not please tell me on my talk page

Liberal

This man a LIbtard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenguy369 (talk • contribs) 10:48, January 21, 2019 (UTC)

@Goldenguy369: Thank you for the compliment! It's even more effective with the capitalization failure! Truly you are a shining example of whatever education system you went through! Ravensfire (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Watching Brahma Kumaris

Hi Ravensfire,

I much appreciate that you were watching the article for nonconstructive or non-neutral edits in the past. Unfortunately there has been some trolling activity recently and since I am a COI editor I can't deal with it so easily, unless the pending SPI report comes back positive, in which case reverting the damage would be non-controversial.

Would you be kind enough to continue the service of looking over the article?

Many thanks Bksimonb (talk) 14:37, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Bigg Boss 7 & 8

Hi I just want to clear a misunderstanding. I am not a socket of Karan Sharma I dont even know who he is. Please do not revert my edits as I think they should be like the other seasons. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by DipikaKum123 (talk • contribs) 05:34, January 26, 2019 (UTC)

Of course your're not! It just so happens that as a brand new user you're making massive changes to articles, in fact the EXACT same changes that multiple socks of this person has made. But nope! Not related! Can't be true! Yup! (Did you feel the sarcasm there?) Ravensfire (talk) 15:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

I didnt say anything wrong. Why you talking to me in a rude way. I am telling the truth that I do not know who Karan Sharma is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DipikaKum123 (talk • contribs) 10:28, January 26, 2019 (UTC)

And you somehow just so happen to make the exact edits that multiple socks did... And a brand-new editor as well! Ravensfire (talk) 18:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

I don't understand who did sock edits but all I want to say is that like the other seasons which have voting history on these two should also have it. Its not sock edits at all. Please stop being negative all the time. I am going to restore the edits and please don't revert them. Please im saying nicely. And plus im reporting you for being rude for no reason.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DipikaKum123 (talk • contribs) 10:28, January 26, 2019 (UTC)

Sock confirmed by CU and blocked indef. General Ization ^Talk 14:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Can't say I'm all that surprised ... Thank you for the update, appreciated! Ravensfire (talk) 15:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Regarding you recent edit made to Anu Malik

How does adding "An assistant producer on Indian Idol 5, Danica D'Souza, has said that the producers were aware of Malik's behaviour." makes sense? This edit makes less sense and don't fit in the compliance of Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Do you want to do any neutral activity here? Seems like we will have to find out a way through Wikipedia's online arbitration. Stop making nonsensical edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkupad (talk • contribs) 11:00, February 4, 2019 (UTC)

So an assisstant producer on the show wouldn't here about what was going on ... right. Considering all you've been doing it trying to whitewash the article, your comment and gratuitous insult is quite telling. You need to start with discussing this on the article talk page and go from there. You've never bothered with this, just tried to edit-war the removal using spurious reasons. If the talk page discussion doesn't work, I'll give you a free hint though - see WP:DR. Ravensfire (talk) 17:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Politrukki (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Dear poorest DESTRUCTIVE EDITOR, WHAT TO YOU THINK OF YOURSELF? (Regarding your recent revert to Baharon ke sapne)

I think i will have to report your destructive activities to Wikipedia administrators. It is not mandatory to give citation for everything under the Sun. Be a part of constructive activities of Wikipedia, and try to make Wikipedia a good place.